Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 3 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Vianney Tricou |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 3 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 3 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Perry |
| 7 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rosamund Lewis |
| 17 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Vianney Tricou |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 17 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 19 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Vianney Tricou |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 19 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 29 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Vianney Tricou |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 29 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 9 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Perry |
| 17 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Vianney Tricou |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 17 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 Feb 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 26 Feb 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-13-103 |
You can find further information about peer review here.