Table 3

Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio for the MGIT method compared to APM (n=373)
APM MGIT Sensitivity % Specificity % Likelihood ratio
No.of resistant isolates No.of susceptible isolates Positive negative
Resistant (27) 25 2 93 167 0.04
Susceptible (346) 1 345 100

Adikaram et al.

Adikaram et al. BMC Infectious Diseases 2012 12:326   doi:10.1186/1471-2334-12-326

Open Data