Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 6 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Justin T Denholm |
| 8 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bin Cao |
| 1 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Magnus Pillgram |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 1 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 10 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bin Cao |
| 13 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Justin T Denholm |
| 12 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Magnus Pillgram |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 12 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 31 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Magnus Pillgram |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 31 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 6 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Magnus Pillgram |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 6 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 18 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Magnus Pillgram |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 18 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 24 Mar 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 24 Mar 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-11-75 |
You can find further information about peer review here.