Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
14 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Lee Fairlie |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
14 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
25 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Beate Kampmann |
1 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Scott Heysell |
14 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Lee Fairlie |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
14 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
1 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Beate Kampmann |
8 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Scott Heysell |
17 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lee Fairlie |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
17 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
25 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Lee Fairlie |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
25 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
26 Jan 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
26 Jan 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-11-28 |
You can find further information about peer review here.