Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 2 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jill Waalen |
| 4 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carol Briggs |
| 15 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark de Souza |
| 20 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Leitman |
| 16 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - John Starr |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 16 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 4 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark de Souza |
| 10 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jill Waalen |
| 23 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carol Briggs |
| 25 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - John Starr |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 25 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 8 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - John Starr |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 8 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 9 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - John Starr |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 9 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 11 Jun 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 11 Jun 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2326-10-4 |
You can find further information about peer review here.