Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 May 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 4 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Berry |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 4 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 13 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Lord |
| 19 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jacqueline Close |
| 6 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nguyen Dinh Nguyen |
| 29 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Berry |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 29 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 4 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jacqueline Close |
| 11 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Lord |
| 14 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Berry |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 14 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 26 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Lord |
| 9 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Berry |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 9 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 Feb 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 22 Feb 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2318-13-19 |
You can find further information about peer review here.