Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 10 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Katie Sheehan |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 10 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 8 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ruth Hubbard |
| 18 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Adams Darowski |
| 3 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Graham |
| 20 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Katie Sheehan |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 20 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 11 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ruth Hubbard |
| 14 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Graham |
| 4 Nov 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Katie Sheehan |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 4 Nov 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 19 Nov 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Katie Sheehan |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 19 Nov 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 26 Nov 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Dec 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2318-13-132 |
You can find further information about peer review here.