Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Geriatrics and BioMed Central.

Open Access Study protocol

Whole body vibration for older persons: an open randomized, multicentre, parallel, clinical trial

Mercè Sitjà-Rabert1*, Mª José Martínez-Zapata2, Azahara Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe3, Ferran Rey-Abella1, Daniel Romero-Rodríguez3 and Xavier Bonfill24

Author Affiliations

1 Physiotherapy Research Group (GReFis), Blanquerna School of Health Science (Universitat Ramon Llull), Barcelona, Spain

2 Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre. Institute of Biomedical Research (IIB Sant Pau); Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Barcelona, Spain

3 EUSES Health and Sport Sciences School, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain

4 Public Health and Clinical Epidemiology Service. Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Geriatrics 2011, 11:89  doi:10.1186/1471-2318-11-89


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/11/89


Received:19 October 2011
Accepted:22 December 2011
Published:22 December 2011

© 2011 Sitjà-Rabert et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Institutionalized older persons have a poor functional capacity. Including physical exercise in their routine activities decreases their frailty and improves their quality of life. Whole-body vibration (WBV) training is a type of exercise that seems beneficial in frail older persons to improve their functional mobility, but the evidence is inconclusive. This trial will compare the results of exercise with WBV and exercise without WBV in improving body balance, muscle performance and fall prevention in institutionalized older persons.

Methods/Design

An open, multicentre and parallel randomized clinical trial with blinded assessment. 160 nursing home residents aged over 65 years and of both sexes will be identified to participate in the study. Participants will be centrally randomised and allocated to interventions (vibration or exercise group) by telephone. The vibration group will perform static/dynamic exercises (balance and resistance training) on a vibratory platform (Frequency: 30-35 Hz; Amplitude: 2-4 mm) over a six-week training period (3 sessions/week). The exercise group will perform the same exercise protocol but without a vibration stimuli platform. The primary outcome measure is the static/dynamic body balance. Secondary outcomes are muscle strength and, number of new falls. Follow-up measurements will be collected at 6 weeks and at 6 months after randomization. Efficacy will be analysed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis and 'per protocol'. The effects of the intervention will be evaluated using the "t" test, Mann-Witney test, or Chi-square test, depending on the type of outcome. The final analysis will be performed 6 weeks and 6 months after randomization.

Discussion

This study will help to clarify whether WBV training improves body balance, gait mobility and muscle strength in frail older persons living in nursing homes. As far as we know, this will be the first study to evaluate the efficacy of WBV for the prevention of falls.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01375790

Background

Progressive ageing of the population has generated an increase in chronic diseases [1]. The concomitant increases in morbidity create vulnerability and frailty in older persons.

Frailty is a common syndrome in older persons [2]. Signs and symptoms of this problem are believed to factors such as fatigue, weight loss, exhaustion, weakness, slow walking speed, decreased balance, low levels of physical activity, slowed motor processing and performance, social withdrawal, cognitive changes, and increased vulnerability to stressors [3-6].

Most falls in older persons are caused by frailty [7,8] and multiple medications [9-11]. Research from the United Kingdom [12], the United States [13] and Australia [14] has shown that falls are a tremendous burden to social and health services. Besides affecting psychological and physical health, fractures from falls often imply hospitalization, thereby increasing morbidity. It has been estimated that total health costs attributable to fall-related injuries will practically triple in the next 50 years. Strategies to prevent the negative consequences of falls are needed. One such strategy is exercise [15,16].

Institutionalized older people have less capacity to exercise, and greater osteoarticular deterioration and fatigue than non-institutionalized older people [3]. Improving their physical activity could increase their autonomy and help prevent falls [17-23]. Fighting sedentary attitudes and promoting physical exercise are growing challenges for physiotherapists and other health professionals working in nursing homes.

Whole body vibration is a type of physical exercise that consists of performing static and dynamic exercises on a platform. These effects of this type of exercise have been studied previously in two studies in nursing home residents [24,25]. The results of these interventions were not conclusive because there are differences in the study protocols and limitations in the study designs. Both studies analysed functional capacity and muscle performance but neither recorded the number of falls.

The aim of the present study is to assess the effect of whole-body vibration training on body balance comparing to exercise without vibration in institutionalized older persons. Secondarily, we will evaluate the effects of training on muscular strength and prevention of falls in this population.

Methods/design

Study design

This study will be an open randomized, multicentre, and parallel clinical trial with evaluator-blinded. The details of this protocol are reported with CONSORT Statement [26]. Figure 1 presents the flow diagram of the study design. The study protocol was approved by the Ethic Committees of the Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí de Sabadell and, the Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Spain.

thumbnailFigure 1. Flow diagram of the study design.

Participants

One-hundred and sixty volunteers' residents at ten nursing homes in Spain will be included over a period of eleven months (see Additional file 1: List of participating centres).

Additional file 1. List of Spanish participants centres.

Format: DOC Size: 25KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Clinicians at each nursing home will identify people eligible for the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible people will be persons of both sexes of seventy-five years or older and living in a nursing home. Inclusions/exclusion criteria are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria

All participants will be informed about the intention of the study and the potential risks before signing the informed consent.

Interventions

Participants will be randomized to an experimental group (WBV group) or to a control group (exercise group). Participants in the WBV group will perform static/dynamic exercise (balance and resistance training) on a vibratory platform (Frequency: 30-35 Hz; Amplitude: 2-4 mm; Pro5 Airdaptive Model, Power Plate®, The Netherlands). Participants in the exercise group will performed the same static/dynamic exercises (balance and resistance training) as the WBV group but without the vibratory platform. Training will consist of 3 sessions per week over 6 weeks. Training volume will be increased progressively over this period. To prevent learning problems at the beginning of the training period, participants will receive an introductory practice session to become familiar with positioning on the vibration platform before the first session [27].

The physiotherapists from each nursing-home will be previously instructed about the study. Three external physiotherapists will verify therapeutic compliance once a week during the intervention and will provide any support needed.

Follow-up

All tests will be performed at baseline, at 6 weeks (at the end of the intervention

period), and 6 months after the end of the study (Figure 1).

Data concerning falls will be regularly collected from each nursing-home or from relatives if a participant moves to another address.

Outcome measures

The outcome assessment will be blinded. The two physiotherapists trained in the evaluation procedure will not know the allocation to intervention.

Primary outcome

• Body Balance

Body balance outcome will be assessed using the Tinetti test [28] and the Timed Up & Go test (TUG) [29].

The Tinetti test has 16 items: 9 for body balance and 7 for gait. The score for each exercise ranges from 0 to 1 or 0 to 2. A lower score indicates poorer physical ability. The global score is 28: 16 is the maximum score for body balance and 12 is the maximum one for gait.

The Timed Up & Go test also assesses functional mobility. Participants stand up from a chair, walk 3 m as quickly and safely as possible, cross a marked line on the floor, turn around and then walk back and sit down in the chair [29]. The chair will be adjusted to the height of each person and will be fixed to the wall. The time taken to complete the task will be recorded.

Secondary outcomes

• Muscle Performance

Muscle performance will be evaluated using five repetitions of the Sit-to-Stand test [30,31]. Subjects will be asked to stand up and sit down five times, as quickly as possible, with their arms folded across the chest. The chair will be adjusted to the height of each person and will be fixed to the wall. The time taken to complete the task will be recorded by chronometer. The maximum speed of each repetition and the average speed will be recorded using the Smart Coach encoder.

• Number of falls

Any falls during the study will be recorded in a fall register developed specifically for the study.

Sample size

We calculated sample size was calculated assuming a difference of 5 points (SD 10) between the groups in the Tinetti test at the end of intervention. We considered a two-sided alpha level of 0.05, a statistical power of 80%, and 20% of losses [24,32]. The total number of estimated cases was 160 (80 in each group).

Randomization

A computer generated randomization list will be generated for participants at each nursing-home using the statistical software SPSS17. Allocation to treatment will be centralized by telephone. All the researchers will be blinded to the randomization sequence list.

Statistical methods

Efficacy will be analysed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis. Additionally, a 'per protocol' analysis will be performed. Missing values will be assigned the last available valid score. We will evaluate the effects of the intervention on each quantitative, qualitative and ordinal outcome using the "t" test, Mann-Witney test or the Chi-square test, depending on the type of outcome. The final analysis will be performed 6 weeks and 6 months after randomization. The number of falls over the 6-month period will be recorded.

Changes in body balance and muscle performance will be analysed 6 weeks and 6 months after starting the study using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Factors included will be the group (vibration or exercise group) and the time (at baseline and after six weeks of intervention), and the interaction between them. The software used will be SPSS17.

Discussion

WBV training is a type of physical exercise in which people perform various exercises in a squat position on a platform device. Several studies have shown promising results using this intervention in walking capacity, speed of gait, body balance, and muscle strength in elder adults [33-40]. Only two trials have evaluated the feasibility of WBV in functional mobility and muscle performance in institutionalized older persons [24,25] to date. Both these trials were small and the variability of the study protocols, comparators, outcome measures and limitations in the studies design made it difficult to reach any definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of WBV in increasing functional capacity of older persons [41].

Our study design incorporates a significantly larger sample, implements randomization, allocation and blinded outcome assessment, and introduces a longer follow up than previous studies. We consider this design will reveal differences between the two study groups in balance and muscle strength, and secondarily, in preventing falls.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The Tecnosport Condition SLU Company (Badalona, Spain) gives the Power plate vibration platforms for this study (Model Pro5 Airdaptive, Power Plate®). Authors have not received remuneration from Tecnosport Condition SLU Company. The clinical trial will be published independently of the positive or negative results.

Authors' contributions

MSR and MJMZ develop the design of the randomized clinical trial. DRR and AFV provide the intervention support. FRA contributes to the methods of muscular strength assessment. XBC provide the methodological support. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Mercè Sitjà i Rabert is a PhD candidate at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.

We would like to acknowledge the contribution of Blanquerna School of Health Science (Universitat Ramon Llull) for their support to the first author, providing her a special leave to work on her thesis. We also thanks Tecnosport Condition SLU (Badalona, Spain) to give the Power plate vibration platforms for this study (Model Pro5 Airdaptive, Power Plate®) and Ms.Carolyn Newey (Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona) for help in the editing process of the manuscript.

This study is funded by the Institute for Older Persons and Social Services (IMSERSO), Spanish Ministry of Health, Social Policy and Equality, Project 180/2010.

References

  1. Forster A, Lambley R, Young JB: Is physical rehabilitation for older people in long-term care effective? Findings from a systematic review.

    Age Ageing 2010, 39:169-175. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Inouye SK, Studenski S, Tinetti ME, Kuchel GA: Geriatric syndromes: clinical, research, and policy implications of a core geriatric concept.

    J Am Geriatr Soc 2007, 55(5):780-791. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  3. Walston J, Hadley EC, Ferruci L, Guralnik JM, Newman AB, Studenski SA, Ershler WB, Harris T, Fried LP: Research Agenda for Frailty in Older Adults: Toward a Better Understanding of Physiology and Etiology: Summary from the American Geriatrics Society/National Institute on Aging Research Conference on Frailty in Older Adults.

    J Am Geriatr Soc 2006, 59:991-1001. OpenURL

  4. Sharon K, Inouye SK, Studenski S, Tinetti ME, Kuchel GA: Geriatric Syndromes: Clinical, Research, and Policy Implications of a Core Geriatric Concept.

    J Am Geriatr Soc 2007, 55:780-791. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  5. Bauer JM, Sieber CC: Sarcopenia and frailty: a clinician's controversial point of view.

    Exp Gerontol 2008, 43(7):674-8.

    Epub 2008 Mar 25. Review

    PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Fried L, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al.: Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype.

    J Geronto A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001, 56:M146-M156. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Englander F, Hodson TJ, Terregrossa RA: Economic dimensions of slip and fall injuries.

    J Forensic Sci 1996, 41:733-746. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  8. Moller J: Projected costs of fall related injury to older persons due to demographic change in Australia. [http:/ / www6.health.gov.au/ internet/ main/ publishing.nsf/ Content/ 1063D7B1A50DA9B5CA256F1900040484/ $File/ falls_costs.pdf] webcite

    Common wealth Department of Health and Ageing; 2004.

  9. Lord SR, Ward JA, Williams P, Anstey KJ: Physiological factors associated with falls in older community-dwelling women.

    J Am Geriatr Soc 1994, 42:1110-1117. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  10. Leipzig RM, Cumming RG, Tinetti ME: Drugs and falls in elder people: A sistematic review and meta-analysis:I. Phychotropic drugs.

    J Am Geriatr Soc 1999, 47:30. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  11. Leipzig RM, Cumming RG, Tinetti ME: Drugs and fallls in elder people: A sistematic review and meta-analysis:II. Cardiac and analgesic drugs.

    J Am Geriatr Soc 1999, 47:40. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  12. Schuffham P, Chaplin S, legood R: Incidence and costs of unintentional falls in older people in the United Kingdom.

    J Epidemiol Community Health 2003, 57:740-744. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  13. Englander F, Hodson TJ, Terregrossa RA: Economic dimensions of slip and fall injuries.

    J Forensic Sci 1996, 41:733-746. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  14. Moller J: Projected costs of fall related injury to older persons due to demographic change in Australia.

    Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing 2004. OpenURL

  15. American Geriatrics Society, British geriatrics Society, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel of Falls Prevention: Guideline for the prevention of falls in older persons.

    J Am Geriatr Soc 2001, 49:664-672. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Royal College of Nursing: Clinical practice guideline for the assessment and prevention of falls in older people. [http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG021fullguideline.pdf] webcite

    National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2004.

  17. Cameron ID, Murray GR, Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, Hill KD, Cummings RG, Kerse N: Interventions for preventing falls in older people in nursing care facilities and hospitals.

    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010., (1)

    Art. No: CD005465. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005465.pub2

    OpenURL

  18. Forster A, Lambley R, Young JB: Is physical rehabilitation for older people in long-term care effective? Findings from a systematic review.

    Age Ageing 2010, 39:169-175. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  19. Visvanathan R, Chapman I: Preventing sarcopaenia in older people.

    Maturitas 2010, 66:383-388. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. Sherrington C, Whitney J, Lord S, Herbert R, Cumming R, Close J: Effective Exercise for the Prevention of Falls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clinical Investigation.

    J Am Geriatr Soc 2008, 56:2234-2243. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Baker MK, Atlantis E, Fiatatone Singh MA: Multi-modal exercise programs for older adults.

    Age Ageing 2007, 36:375-381. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Sen A, Gordon PM: Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: A meta-analysis.

    Ageing Res Rev 2010, 9(3):226-237. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  23. Howe TE, Rochester L, Jackson A, Banks PMH, Blair VA: Ejercicios para mejorar el equilibrio en ancianos (Revisión Cochrane traducida).

    La Biblioteca Cochrane Plus 2008.

    Número 2

    OpenURL

  24. Bruyère O, Wuidart MA, Di Palma E, Gourlay M, Ethgen O, Richy F, Reginster JY: Controlled whole body vibration to decrease fall risk and improve health-related quality of life of nursing home residents.

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 86:303-307. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  25. Bautmans I, Van Hees E, Lemper J, Mets T: The feasibility of Whole Body Vibration in institutionalised elderly persons and its influence on muscle performance, balance and mobility: a randomised controlled trial.

    BMC Geriatr 2005, 5:17. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  26. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG: CONSORT 2010 Explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

    J Clin Epidemiol 2010, 63:e1-e37. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  27. Cardinale M, Rittweger J: Vibration exercise makes your muscles and bones stronger: fact or fiction?

    Br Menopause Soc 2006, 12(1):12-18. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  28. Tinetti ME: Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems un elderly patients.

    J Am Geriatr Soc 1986, 34:119-126. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  29. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S: The timed "Up & Go":a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons.

    J Am Geriatr Soc 1991, 39:142-148. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  30. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, Scherr PA, Wallace RB: A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: Association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission.

    J Gerontol 1994, 49(2):M85-M94. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  31. Bohannon RW: Reference values for the five-repetition sit-to-stand test: a descriptive meta-analysis of data from elders.

    Percept Mot Skills 2006, 103(1):215-222. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  32. Neira M, Rodríguez-Mañas L: Caídas repetidas en el medio residencial.

    Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 2006, 41(4):201-206. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  33. Bogaerts A, Delecluse C, Claessens AL, Coudyzer W, Boonen S, Verschueren SM: Impact of whole-body vibration training versus fitness training on muscle strength and muscle mass in older men: a 1-year randomized controlled trial.

    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2007, 62:630-635. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  34. Machado A, Garcia-Lopez D, Gonzalez-Gallego J, Garatachea N: Whole-body vibration training increases muscle strength and mass in older women: a randomized-controlled trial.

    Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010, 20(2):200-7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  35. Corrie H, Brooke-Wavell K, Mansfield N, Griffiths V, D'Souza O, Morris R, et al.: A randomised controlled trial on the effects of whole body vibration on muscle power in older people at risk of falling.

    Osteoporos Int 2007, 18(Suppl 3):, S253-S254. OpenURL

  36. Trans T, Aaboe J, Henriksen M, Christensen R, Bliddal H, Lund H: Effect of whole body vibration exercise on muscle strength and proprioception in females with knee osteoarthritis.

    Knee 2009. OpenURL

  37. Cheung WH, Mok HW, Qin L, Sze PC, Lee KM, Leung KS: High-frequency whole-body vibration improves balancing ability in elderly women.

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007, 88:852-857. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  38. Rees SS, Murphy AJ, Watsford ML: Effects of whole body vibration on postural steadiness in an older population.

    J Sci Med Sport 2009, 12:440-444. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  39. Rees SS, Murphy AJ, Watsford ML: Effects of whole-body vibration exercise on lower-extremity muscle strength and power in an older population: a randomized clinical trial.

    Phys Ther 2008, 88:462-470. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  40. Roelants M, Delecluse C, Verschueren SM: Whole-body-vibration training increases knee-extension strength and speed of movement in older women.

    J Am Geriatr Soc 2004, 52:901-908. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  41. Merriman H, Jackson K: The effects of Whole-body vibration training in Aging Adults: A systematic review.

    J Geriatr Phys Ther 2009, 32(3):134-145. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/11/89/prepub