Table 2

Distribution of cagA and vacA alleles in patients

Diagnosis in patients

n = 224


Virulence marker

Non ulcer dyspepsia

n = 120

Gastric ulcer

n = 32

Gastric carcinoma

n = 40

Duodenal ulcer

n = 32

P value*


CagA

Positive

51 (42)

20(62)

31(77)

23(72)

<0.001

Negative

69 (58)

12(38)

9(23)

9(28)

VacAs1a

Positive

79 (66)

25(78)

31(77)

19(59)

0.211

Negative

41 (34)

7(22)

9(23)

13(41)

VacAs1b

Positive

30 (25)

12 (37)

17 (42)

13 (41)

0.100

Negative

90 (75)

20(63)

23(58)

19 (59)

VacAm1

Positive

50 (42)

27(84)

29(72)

29(91)

<0.001

Negative

70 (58)

5(16)

11(28)

3(9)

VacAm2

Positive

74 (62)

15(47)

15(37)

12(37)

<0.01

Negative

46 (38)

17(53)

25(63)

20(63)

VacAs1am1

Positive

38 (32%)

23(72)

23(56)

17(53)

<0.001

Negative

82 (68%)

9(28)

17(44)

15(47)

VacAs1bm1

Positive

13 (11)

9(28)

11(28)

12(38)

<0.001

Negative

107 (89)

23(72)

29(82)

20(62)

CagA s1am1

Positive

22 (18)

11(34)

22(55)

11(34)

<0.001

Negative

98(82)

21(66)

18(45)

21(66)

CagA s1bm1

Positive

19 (16)

11(34)

7(18)

5(16)

0.01

Negative

101 (84)

21(66)

33 (82)

27(84)

vacAi

i1 and i2 positive

4(3)

0

2(5)

0

< 0.001

i1 and i2 negative

2(2)

2(6)

1(3)

0

i1 positive

5(4)

27(85)

33(82)

27(84)

i2 positive

109(91)

3(9)

4(10)

5(16)


* Differences in proportion were assessed by using Pearson Chi square, Fisher exact or likelihood ratio test where appropriate.

Yakoob et al. BMC Gastroenterology 2009 9:87   doi:10.1186/1471-230X-9-87

Open Data