Table 2

Change in histopathologic scores (mean ± SD)*

Sham

BDL

BDL + vehicle

BDL + fenofibrate


Portal inflammation

0

3.2 ± 0.2a

3.1 ± 0.7a

2.0 ± 0.5a,b,c

Interface hepatitis

0

1.8 ± 0.7a

1.7 ± 0.9a

1.3 ± 0.6a,b,c

Confluent necrosis

0

2.2 ± 0.a

2.1 ± 0.9a

1.1 ± 0.2a,b,c

Lobar necrosis

0

3.0 ± 0.9a

2.9 ± 0.7a

2.1 ± 0.8a,b,c

Bile duct number/5 portal field

3.5 ± 1.3

18.9 ± 8.0a

17.5 ± 7.1a

23.2 ± 11.1a,b,c


*Comparisons between groups were done by using Kruskal-Wallis test. Paired comparisons are done by using Mann-Whitney U test.

aP < 0.01 versus sham group (Mann-Whitney U)

bP < 0.01 as compared to BDL group (Mann-Whitney U)

cP < 0.01 as compared to BDL + vehicle group (Mann-Whitney U)

Cindoruk et al. BMC Gastroenterology 2007 7:44   doi:10.1186/1471-230X-7-44

Open Data