Anomalous opening of the common bile duct into the duodenal bulb: endoscopic treatment

doi:10.1186/1471-230X-7-26

BMC Gastroenterology

Volume 7

Viewing options:

Abstract
Full text
PDF (841KB)
Additional files

Associated material:

Related literature:

Articles citing this article
on Google Scholar
on ISI Web of Science
on PubMed Central
Other articles by authors
on Google Scholar

Disibeyaz S
Parlak E
Cicek B
Cengiz C
Kuran SO
Oguz D
Güzel H
Sahin B

on PubMed

Disibeyaz S
Parlak E
Cicek B
Cengiz C
Kuran SO
Oguz D
Güzel H
Sahin B
Related articles/pages
on Google

on Google Scholar

on PubMed

Tools:

Post to:

Twitter

Research article

Anomalous opening of the common bile duct into the duodenal bulb: endoscopic treatment

Selcuk Disibeyaz¹^* , Erkan Parlak¹^* , Bahattin Cicek¹^* , Cem Cengiz¹^* , Sedef O Kuran¹^* , Dilek Oguz¹^* , Hakan Güzel²^* and Burhan Sahin¹^*

¹Department of Gastroenterology, Turkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Hospital, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey

²Department of General Surgery, Diskapi Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Diskapi, Ankara, Turkey

author email corresponding author email* Contributed equally

BMC Gastroenterology 2007, 7:26doi:10.1186/1471-230X-7-26


Published:	5 July 2007

Abstract

Background

Anomalous biliary opening especially the presence of the ampulla of Vater in the duodenal bulb is a very rare phenomenon. We report clinical implications, laboratory and ERCP findings and also therapeutic approaches in 53 cases.

Methods

The data were collected from the records of 12.158 ERCP. The diagnosis was established as an anomalous opening of the common bile duct (CBD) into the duodenal bulb when there is an orifice observed in the bulb with the absence of a papillary structure at its normal localization and when the CBD is visualized by cholangiography through this orifice without evidence of any other opening.

Results

A total of 53 cases were recruited. There was an obvious male preponderance (M/F: 49/4). Demographic data and ERCP findings were available for all, but clinical characteristics and laboratory findings could be obtained from 39 patients with full records. Thirty – seven of 39 cases had abdominal pain (95%) and 23 of them (59%) had cholangitis as well. Elevated AP and GGT were found in 97.4% (52/53). History of cholecystectomy was present in 64% of the cases, recurrent cholangitis in 26% and duodenal ulcer in 45%. Normal papilla was not observed in any of the patients and a cleft-like opening was evident instead. The CBD was hook shaped at the distal part that opens to the duodenal bulb. Pancreatic duct (PD) was opening separately into the bulb in all the cases when it was possible to visualize. Dilated CBD in ERCP was evident in 94% and the CBD stone was demonstrated in 51%. PD was dilated in four of 12 (33%) cases. None of them has a history of pancreatitis. Endoscopically, Papillary Balloon Dilatation instead of Sphincterotomy carried out in 19 of 27 patients (70%) with choledocholithiazis. Remaining eight patients had undergone surgery (30%). Clinical symptoms were resolved with medical treatment in 16(32%) patients with dilated CBD but no stone. Perforation and bleeding were occurred only in two patients, which stones extracted with sphincterotomy (each complication in 1 patient).

Conclusion

The opening of the CBD into the duodenal bulb is a rare event that may be associated with biliary and gastric/duodenal diseases. To date, surgical treatment has been preferred. In our experience, sphincterotomy has a high risk since it may lead to bleeding and perforation by virtue of the fact that a true papillary structure is absent. However, we performed balloon dilatation of the orifice successfully without any serious complication and suggest this as a safe therapeutic modality.