Open Access Research article

Intravenous non-high-dose pantoprazole is equally effective as high-dose pantoprazole in preventing rebleeding among low risk patients with a bleeding peptic ulcer after initial endoscopic hemostasis

Chih-Ming Liang1, Jyong-Hong Lee1, Yuan-Hung Kuo1, Keng-Liang Wu1,2, Yi-Chun Chiu1,2, Yeh-Pin Chou1,2, Ming-Luen Hu1, Wei-Chen Tai1,2, King-Wah Chiu1, Tsung-Hui Hu1,2 and Seng-Kee Chuah1,2*

Author Affiliations

1 Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gang Memorial Hospital, 123 Ta-Pei Road, Niaosung Hsiang, Kaohsiung City 833, Taiwan

2 Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Gastroenterology 2012, 12:28 doi:10.1186/1471-230X-12-28

Published: 28 March 2012

Abstract

Background

Many studies have shown that high-dose proton-pumps inhibitors (PPI) do not further reduce the rate of rebleeding compared to non-high-dose PPIs but we do not know whether intravenous non-high-dose PPIs reduce rebleeding rates among patients at low risk (Rockall score < 6) or among those at high risk, both compared to high-dose PPIs. This retrospective case-controlled study aimed to identify the subgroups of these patients that might benefit from treatment with non-high-dose PPIs.

Methods

Subjects who received high dose and non-high-dose pantoprazole for confirmed acute PU bleeding at a tertiary referral hospital were enrolled (n = 413). They were divided into sustained hemostasis (n = 324) and rebleeding groups (n = 89). The greedy method was applied to allow treatment-control random matching (1:1). Patients were randomly selected from the non-high-dose and high-dose PPI groups who had a high risk peptic ulcer bleeding (n = 104 in each group), and these were then subdivided to two subgroups (Rockall score ≥ 6 vs. < 6, n = 77 vs. 27).

Results

An initial low hemoglobin level, serum creatinine level, and Rockall score were independent factors associated with rebleeding. After case-control matching, the significant variables between the non-high-dose and high-dose PPI groups for a Rockall score ≥ 6 were the rebleeding rate, and the amount of blood transfused. Case-controlled matching for the subgroup with a Rockall score < 6 showed that the rebleeding rate was similar for both groups (11.1% in each group).

Conclusion

Intravenous non-high-dose pantoprazole is equally effective as high-dose pantoprazole when treating low risk patients with a Rockall sore were < 6 who have bleeding ulcers and high-risk stigmata after endoscopic hemostasis.

Keywords:
Intravenous proton-pump inhibitors; Peptic ulcer bleeding; Endoscopic hemostasis; Rebleeding; Rockall scores