Peer Review reports
From: Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 18 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ray Garry |
| 24 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stefan Sauerland |
| 30 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anette Sundfor Jacobsen |
| 21 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Xiaohang Li |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 21 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 11 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stefan Sauerland |
| 22 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anette Sundfor Jacobsen |
| 30 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Xiaohang Li |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 30 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 1 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Xiaohang Li |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 1 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 2 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Xiaohang Li |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 2 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 3 Nov 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 3 Nov 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-230X-10-129 |
You can find further information about peer review here.