Table 3 |
|
|
Descriptive Statistics and Scale Evaluation for Issues and Test Value |
|
|
Mean (SD) |
|
|
|
|
|
Testing issues * |
|
|
Managed care practice guidelines |
5.4 (2.3) |
|
Patient's perceived value of the test |
6.5 (1.9) |
|
Reduced need to refer patients to allergists |
6.8 (2.0) |
|
Difficulty in interpreting test results |
4.4 (2.6) |
|
Familiarity with test use |
6.9 (2.3) |
|
Patient demand to have the test done |
7.0 (1.9) |
|
Type of allergic rhinitis (intermittent vs. persistent) |
6.6 (1.9) |
|
How well test results relate to symptoms |
7.6 (1.9) |
|
Value of testing to my practice |
6.9 (2.3) |
|
Testing value ** |
|
|
Overall value of specific IgE as a diagnostic tool |
3.9 (1.1) |
|
Compared to skin testing, usefulness of specific IgE blood testing |
3.9 (1.4) |
|
Compared to not testing at all, usefulness of specific IgE blood testing |
4.3 (1.2) |
|
|
|
|
* Issues – scale = 1 less likely to test, 10 = more likely to test; (measure of internal consistency of items – α = 0.90) ** Value – scale = 1 not valuable; 6 = highly valuable; (measure of internal consistency of items – α = 0.86) |
|
|
Szeinbach et al. BMC Family Practice 2008 9:47 doi:10.1186/1471-2296-9-47 |
|