Table 10 |
|||||||
|
Performance against infrastructure indicators. |
|||||||
|
Indicator |
Teams |
Comments |
|||||
|
|
|||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
||
|
|
|||||||
|
Support infrastructure established in team administration |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Administrative support helped with ethics and governance applications. Minutes taken in meetings by administrators helped action planning. |
|||
|
Links developed to management in organisation |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Teams that included managers, enabled protected time for practitioners. In Team five, management links enabled connections to quality improvement cycles in the PCT. |
|||
|
Arrangements were in place for team members to take protected time to undertake research |
✓ |
✓ |
*✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Having someone to cover clinical duties whilst engaged in research was a key determinant of enabling protected time for research to be undertaken. * Nurses had difficulty in Team three, and finding locum cover was a particular problem for the pharmacists in Team six. A GP in Team three had difficulty obtaining locum cover but was able to achieve protected time to do research by extending her part time hours. |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Cooke et al. BMC Family Practice 2008 9:37 doi:10.1186/1471-2296-9-37 |
|||||||