|
Overview of the test characteristics of the four selection methods. |
||||||||
| 6 cl. method 3%FA1 |
6 cl. method 10%FA2 |
4 cl. method 3%FA3 |
4 cl. method 10%FA4 |
|||||
|
|
||||||||
| women |
men |
women |
men |
women |
men |
women |
men |
|
| Sensitivity |
94,2 |
89,4 |
94,0 |
93.1 |
89.4 |
93.6 |
94.7 |
91.5 |
| Specificity |
99,8 |
99,8 |
99,3 |
99.8 |
99.8 |
99.6 |
99.6 |
99.1 |
| PPV5 |
93,7 |
93,7 |
94,3 |
98.2 |
93.7 |
89.5 |
96.3 |
93.1 |
| NPV6 |
99,8 |
99,6 |
99,2 |
99.0 |
99.6 |
99.8 |
99.3 |
98.8 |
| Kappa |
0.937 |
0.912 |
0.934 |
0.950 |
0.912 |
0.911 |
0.949 |
0.912 |
| 3 cl. method 3%FA7 |
3 cl. method 10%FA8 |
3 group method 3%FA9 |
3 group method 10%FA10 |
|||||
| women |
men |
women |
men |
women |
men |
women |
men |
|
| Sensitivity |
89.0 |
84.8 |
96.0 |
85.5 |
76.1 |
73.6 |
79.3 |
86.5 |
| Specificity |
99.3 |
99.3 |
98.3 |
98.8 |
99.1 |
99.4 |
98.5 |
97.6 |
| PPV |
88.1 |
80.4 |
87.8 |
90.6 |
74.1 |
82.3 |
86.9 |
83.1 |
| NPV |
99.6 |
99.5 |
99.5 |
98.0 |
99.2 |
99.1 |
97.4 |
98.1 |
| Kappa |
0.881 |
0.819 |
0.906 |
0.864 |
0.742 |
0.770 |
0.809 |
0.826 |
| 6 cl. method |
4 cl. method |
3 cl. method |
3 group method |
|||||
| 3% FA |
10% FA |
3% FA |
10% FA |
3% FA |
10% FA |
3% FA |
10% FA |
|
| Men and women |
Men and Women |
Men and women |
Men and Women |
|||||
| Sensitivity |
91.8 |
93.5 |
90.9 |
93.0 |
86.9 |
90.6 |
74.8 |
83.0 |
| Specificity |
99.8 |
99.5 |
99.7 |
99.3 |
99.4 |
98.5 |
99.3 |
98.0 |
| PPV |
93.7 |
96.3 |
91.4 |
94.6 |
84.1 |
89.1 |
78.0 |
84.8 |
| NPV |
99.7 |
99.1 |
99.7 |
99.1 |
99.5 |
98.7 |
99.1 |
97.7 |
| Kappa |
0.925 |
0.942 |
0.912 |
0.930 |
0.849 |
0.885 |
0.756 |
0.818 |
|
1. 6 cl. method: selection FAs per 10 years of age. 2. Idem 3. 4 cl. method: selection of FAs per 15 years of age 4. Idem 5. positive predictive value 6. negative predictive value 7. 3 cl. method: selection of FAs in 3 age groups (15–44; 45–64; 65–74). 8. Idem 9. 3 group method: selection of male FAs in two age groups (15–44; 45–74) and women in one group. 10. Idem | ||||||||
Smits et al. BMC Family Practice 2008 9:21 doi:10.1186/1471-2296-9-21 |
||||||||