Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Family Practice and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Gender bias revisited: new insights on the differential management of chest pain

Stefan Bösner1*, Jörg Haasenritter1, Maren Abu Hani1, Heidi Keller1, Andreas C Sönnichsen2, Konstantinos Karatolios3, Juergen R Schaefer3, Erika Baum1 and Norbert Donner-Banzhoff1

Author Affiliations

1 Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, University of Marburg, 35032 Marburg, Germany

2 Department of Family Medicine, Paracelsus University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria

3 Department of Cardiology, University of Marburg, 35032 Marburg, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Family Practice 2011, 12:45  doi:10.1186/1471-2296-12-45

Published: 6 June 2011

Abstract

Background

Chest pain is a common complaint and reason for consultation in primary care. Few data exist from a primary care setting whether male patients are treated differently than female patients. We examined whether there are gender differences in general physicians' (GPs) initial assessment and subsequent management of patients with chest pain, and how these differences can be explained

Methods

We conducted a prospective study with 1212 consecutive chest pain patients. The study was conducted in 74 primary care offices in Germany from October 2005 to July 2006. After a follow up period of 6 months, an independent interdisciplinary reference panel reviewed clinical data of every patient and decided about the etiology of chest pain at the time of patient recruitment (delayed type-reference standard). We adjusted gender differences of six process indicators for different models.

Results

GPs tended to assume that CHD is the cause of chest pain more often in male patients and referred more men for an exercise test (women 4.1%, men 7.3%, p = 0.02) and to the hospital (women 2.9%, men 6.6%, p < 0.01). These differences remained when adjusting for age and cardiac risk factors but ceased to exist after adjusting for the typicality of chest pain.

Conclusions

While observed gender differences can not be explained by differences in age, CHD prevalence, and underlying risk factors, the less typical symptom presentation in women might be an underlying factor. However this does not seem to result in suboptimal management in women but rather in overuse of services for men. We consider our conclusions rather hypothesis generating and larger studies will be necessary to prove our proposed model.