Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt

doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-21

BMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume 8

Viewing options:

Abstract
Full text
PDF (285KB)

Associated material:

Related literature:

Articles citing this article
on Google Scholar
on ISI Web of Science
on PubMed Central
Other articles by authors
on Google Scholar

Atkins S
Lewin S
Smith H
Engel M
Fretheim A
Volmink J

on PubMed

Atkins S
Lewin S
Smith H
Engel M
Fretheim A
Volmink J
Related articles/pages
on Google

on Google Scholar

on PubMed

Tools:

Post to:

Debate

Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt

Salla Atkins¹^,2^,3 , Simon Lewin¹^,4 , Helen Smith⁵ , Mark Engel⁶ , Atle Fretheim⁷ and Jimmy Volmink²^,8

¹Health Systems Research Unit, Medical Research Council of South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa

²South African Cochrane Centre, Medical Research Council of South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa

³Primary Health Care Directorate, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

⁴Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

⁵International Health Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, UK

⁶Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

⁷Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Norway

⁸University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa

author email corresponding author email

BMC Medical Research Methodology 2008, 8:21doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-21


Published:	16 April 2008

Abstract

Background

Qualitative synthesis has become more commonplace in recent years. Meta-ethnography is one of several methods for synthesising qualitative research and is being used increasingly within health care research. However, many aspects of the steps in the process remain ill-defined.

Discussion

We utilized the seven stages of the synthesis process to synthesise qualitative research on adherence to tuberculosis treatment. In this paper we discuss the methodological and practical challenges faced; of particular note are the methods used in our synthesis, the additional steps that we found useful in clarifying the process, and the key methodological challenges encountered in implementing the meta-ethnographic approach.

The challenges included shaping an appropriate question for the synthesis; identifying relevant studies; assessing the quality of the studies; and synthesising findings across a very large number of primary studies from different contexts and research traditions. We offer suggestions that may assist in undertaking meta-ethnographies in the future.

Summary

Meta-ethnography is a useful method for synthesising qualitative research and for developing models that interpret findings across multiple studies. Despite its growing use in health research, further research is needed to address the wide range of methodological and epistemological questions raised by the approach.