Assessing the order of magnitude of outcomes in single-arm cohorts through systematic comparison with corresponding cohorts: An example from the AMOS study
-
* Corresponding author: Harald J Hamre harald.hamre@ifaemm.de
1 Institute for Applied Epistemology and Medical Methodology, Freiburg, Germany
2 Director, Clinical Research Dr Tröger, Freiburg, Germany
BMC Medical Research Methodology 2008, 8:11 doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-11
Published: 19 March 2008Additional files
Additional file 1:
Excluded publications. List of excluded publications with reasons for exclusion
Format: PDF Size: 298KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader
Additional file 2:
Included publications. List of included publications
Format: PDF Size: 31KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader
Additional file 3:
Description of AMOS cohorts and corresponding cohorts, stratified by diagnosis. Descriptive data for AMOS cohorts and for corresponding cohorts on gender, age, study design, setting, disease duration at baseline, study treatment, last follow-up and follow-up rates
Format: PDF Size: 78KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader
Additional file 4:
Comparative analyses, stratified by diagnosis and SF-36 scales. Baseline scores of AMOS cohorts and of corresponding cohorts as well as between-group outcome differences, stratified by diagnosis and SF-36 scales
Format: PDF Size: 93KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader
