Table 1 |
|
Questionnaire for evaluation of QUADAS |
|
a) Review details |
|
b) Content of the tool: |
|
• Did QUADAS cover all important items? |
|
• Were any QUADAS items omitted, added or modified? |
|
c) Background document: |
|
• Was the background document easy to understand? |
|
• Were scoring instructions understandable? |
|
• Should any items have been scored differently? |
|
d) Technical points |
|
• How long did it take to complete QUADAS? |
|
• Was inter-rater reliability assessed? |
|
e) Overall conclusions |
|
• Reviewers were asked to rate coverage, ease of use, clarity of instructions, and validity (whether QUADAS helped to distinguish between studies of different qualities) on a five point scale |
|
• Would you us QUADAS again? |
|
f) Additional questions |
|
• How were the results of quality incorporated into the review? |
|
• Was a training session organised to ensure reviewers applied the tool consistently? |
|
• Reviewer details, including age, experience, professional background |
|
• Have you previously been involved in the quality assessment of studies included in a systematic review? |
|
g) Final comments |
|
|
|
Whiting et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2006 6:9 doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-9 |