Peer Review reports
From: Reviewer agreement trends from four years of electronic submissions of conference abstract
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
5 Aug 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Wager |
1 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karen Shashok |
23 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Rowe |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
23 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
23 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Rowe |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
6 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Wager |
6 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karen Shashok |
10 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Rowe |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
10 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
10 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Rowe |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
10 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
21 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Rowe |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
21 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
6 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Rowe |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
6 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
19 Mar 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
19 Mar 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-6-14 |
You can find further information about peer review here.