BMC Medical Research Methodology
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
Research articleIntracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reportedMarion K Campbell1 , Jeremy M Grimshaw2 and Diana R Elbourne3  1
Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK 2
Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada 3
Medical Statistics Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK author email corresponding author email
BMC Medical Research Methodology 2004,
4:9doi:10.1186/1471-2288-4-9 Abstract
Background
Increasingly, researchers are recognizing that there are many situations where the use of a cluster randomized trial may be more appropriate than an individually randomized trial. Similarly, the need for appropriate standards of reporting of cluster trials is more widely acknowledged.
Methods
In this paper, we describe the results of a survey to inform the appropriate reporting of the intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC) – the statistical measure of the clustering effect associated with a cluster randomized trial.
Results
We identified three dimensions that should be considered when reporting an ICC – a description of the dataset (including characteristics of the outcome and the intervention), information on how the ICC was calculated, and information on the precision of the ICC.
Conclusions
This paper demonstrates the development of a framework for the reporting of ICCs. If adopted into routine practice, it has the potential to facilitate the interpretation of the cluster trial being reported and should help the development of new trials in the area. |