Table 3 |
||||||
|
The type and number of guidelines accompanying critical appraisal tools per study design |
||||||
|
Type of critical appraisal tool |
Type of guideline |
Total number of critical appraisal tools |
||||
|
|
||||||
|
Handbook/published paper |
Accompanying explanation |
Total |
||||
|
|
||||||
|
Number of tools |
References |
Number of tools |
References |
|||
|
|
||||||
|
Systematic reviews |
9 |
[2,4,15,20,25,28,29,331,36,116] |
3 |
[16,26,27] |
12 |
26 |
|
Experimental studies |
10 |
[2,4,25,37,41,50,64-66,69] |
6 |
[26,40,49,51,57,59] |
16 |
45 |
|
Diagnostic studies |
3 |
[74,75,76] |
1 |
[79] |
4 |
7 |
|
Observational studies |
9 |
[2,25,66,80,84-87] |
1 |
[83] |
10 |
19 |
|
Qualitative studies |
4 |
[9,87,89,90] |
1 |
[26] |
5 |
7 |
|
Experimental & Observational studies |
2 |
[9,95] |
1 |
[91] |
3 |
6 |
|
All study designs |
1 |
[100] |
1 |
[102] |
2 |
10 |
|
Total |
38 |
14 |
52 |
120 |
||
|
|
||||||
|
Katrak et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2004 4:22 doi:10.1186/1471-2288-4-22 |
||||||