Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Medical Research Methodology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a pre-recruitment primer letter to increase participation in a study of colorectal screening and surveillance

Christine Paul12*, Ryan Courtney12, Rob Sanson-Fisher12, Mariko Carey12, David Hill34, Jody Simmons5 and Shiho Rose12

Author Affiliations

1 Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour (PRCHB), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia

2 Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI), New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia

3 Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, The Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, VIC, Australia

4 Professorial Fellow, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

5 Cancer Prevention Centre, The Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, VIC, Australia

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Medical Research Methodology 2014, 14:44  doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-44

Published: 1 April 2014

Abstract

Background

Recruiting cancer patients is a barrier often encountered in research trials. However, very few randomized trials explore strategies to improve participation rates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a pre-recruitment primer letter to recruit persons diagnosed with colorectal cancer for a research trial.

Methods

Potentially eligible participants were identified by the Victorian Cancer Registry. A total of 1,062 participants were randomized to receive either a mailed explanatory primer letter designed to encourage research participation, or no primer letter. Two weeks after the intervention, the Victorian Cancer Registry sought permission from patients to release their contact details to researchers. Those who agreed were contacted and invited to the study.

Results

Pre-recruitment encouragement was not effective at increasing recruitment, with no significant differences demonstrated between experimental groups. Overall, 40% (n = 425) consented to participate, 25% (n = 243) refused and 35% (n = 394) did not respond.

Conclusions

While this study demonstrated disappointing outcomes, pre-recruitment letters should not be ruled out as an approach altogether. Rather, future research should explore whether other factors to increase motivation, such as intensity and timing, are feasible and acceptable for contacting cancer patients.

Trial registration

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12609000628246

Keywords:
Colorectal cancer; Patient recruitment; Population registers; Randomized controlled trials