Correspondence
Why do you think you should be the author on this manuscript? Analysis of open-ended responses of authors in a general medical journal
Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split, School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
BMC Medical Research Methodology 2012, 12:189 doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-189
Published: 20 December 2012Additional files
Additional file 1:
Table S1. Contribution declarations of authors (n=98) whose free text authorship statements included both ICMJE matching and non-matching contributions.
Format: DOC Size: 54KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional file 2:
Table S2. Sentence structure of authors’ answers (n=1282) to the open-ended question: Why do you think you should be the author on this manuscript?
Format: DOC Size: 37KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
Additional file 3:
Figure S1. Distribution of manuscripts with (closed bars) or without (open bars) identical contribution declarations from at least 2 authors according to the number of authors on the manuscript.
Format: DOC Size: 53KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word Viewer
