Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
31 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Höhle |
6 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Martin Wolkewitz |
12 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicolas VOIRIN |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
12 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
20 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Martin Wolkewitz |
10 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Höhle |
4 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicolas VOIRIN |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
4 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
18 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Höhle |
8 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicolas VOIRIN |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
8 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
4 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicolas VOIRIN |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
4 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
15 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicolas VOIRIN |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
15 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
20 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-53 |
You can find further information about peer review here.