Peer Review reports
From: Conducting Online Expert panels: a feasibility and experimental replicability study
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 4 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Petter Andreas Steen |
| 5 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michel Wensing |
| 16 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dmitry Khodyakov |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 16 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 25 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michel Wensing |
| 28 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Petter Andreas Steen |
| 5 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dmitry Khodyakov |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 5 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 19 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dmitry Khodyakov |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 19 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 20 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dmitry Khodyakov |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 20 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 23 Dec 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 23 Dec 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-174 |
You can find further information about peer review here.