Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Medical Research Methodology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

The Paired Availability Design for Historical Controls

Stuart G Baker1*, Karen S Lindeman2 and Barnett S Kramer3

Author Affiliations

1 Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA

2 Department of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA

3 Office of Disease Prevention and Medical Applications of Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Medical Research Methodology 2001, 1:9  doi:10.1186/1471-2288-1-9

Published: 26 September 2001

Abstract

Background

Although a randomized trial represents the most rigorous method of evaluating a medical intervention, some interventions would be extremely difficult to evaluate using this study design. One alternative, an observational cohort study, can give biased results if it is not possible to adjust for all relevant risk factors.

Methods

A recently developed and less well-known alternative is the paired availability design for historical controls. The paired availability design requires at least 10 hospitals or medical centers in which there is a change in the availability of the medical intervention. The statistical analysis involves a weighted average of a simple "before" versus "after" comparison from each hospital or medical center that adjusts for the change in availability.

Results

We expanded requirements for the paired availability design to yield valid inference. (1) The hospitals or medical centers serve a stable population. (2) Other aspects of patient management remain constant over time. (3) Criteria for outcome evaluation are constant over time. (4) Patient preferences for the medical intervention are constant over time. (5) For hospitals where the intervention was available in the "before" group, a change in availability in the "after group" does not change the effect of the intervention on outcome.

Conclusion

The paired availability design has promise for evaluating medical versus surgical interventions, in which it is difficult to recruit patients to a randomized trial.