Table 2 |
|||
|
Self-efficacy before and after the TAS-course |
|||
|
Question |
Likert scale: "Did not work" (1) through "Worked excellent" (7) |
||
|
(n) |
mean (95% CI) |
||
|
|
|||
|
"How did triage work?" |
Before course |
87 |
4,9 (4,6-5,1) |
|
After course |
5,9 (5,7-6,1)* |
||
|
|
|||
|
"How did interdisciplinary cooperation of triage work?" |
Before course |
88 |
4,9 (4,7-5,2) |
|
After course |
5,8 (5,6-6,0)* |
||
|
|
|||
|
"How did triage tagging work?" |
Before course |
83 |
3,8 (3,4-4,3) |
|
After course |
6,0 (5,8-6,1)* |
||
|
|
|||
|
Note: CI = Confidence Interval; *) p < 0,001 Each question was scored on a 7-point Likert scale with points labelled "Did not work" (1) through "Worked excellent" (7) |
|||
|
Rehn et al. BMC Emergency Medicine 2010 10:17 doi:10.1186/1471-227X-10-17 |
|||