Table 3 |
||
|
Multivariable analyses for the association between the hypothesis variables and guideline concordance*# |
||
|
Hypothesis variables |
LDL concordance (95% CI; p-value) |
BP concordance (95% CI; p-value) |
|
|
||
|
Patient factors |
||
|
Age (per 10 year increment) |
0.94 (0.91–0.97; p < 0.01) |
0.86 (0.83–0.89; p < 0.01) |
|
Distance to medical center (per 25 mile increment) |
0.99 (0.99–1.00; p = 0.19) |
0.99 (0.99–1.00; p = 0.30) |
|
Diabetes |
1.44 (1.35–1.54; p < 0.01) |
1.01 (0.94–1.08; p = 0.89) |
|
Vascular disease& |
0.99 (0.91–1.07; p = 0.76) |
0.91 (0.84–0.99; p = 0.03) |
|
Processes of care |
||
|
Total medications (per 1 medication increment) |
1.01 (1.00–1.01; p < 0.01) |
1.01 (1.00–1.01; p = 0.03) |
|
Total Visits (per 1 visit increment) |
1.02 (1.01–1.02; p < 0.01) |
1.02 (1.01–1.02; p < 0.01) |
|
Recent cardiac hospitalization |
1.28 (1.11–1.49; p < 0.01) |
1.34 (1.14–1.57; p < 0.01) |
|
Structures of care |
||
|
Clinic volume |
1.01 (1.00–1.02; p = 0.76) |
0.82 (0.68–0.99; p < 0.01) |
|
On-site cardiologist |
1.14 (1.00–1.30; p = 0.04) |
1.10 (0.99–1.22; p = 0.10) |
|
|
||
|
*The cumulative logit model estimates the probability that each subject is in a lower (i.e., better) category compared to a higher (i.e., worse) category of guideline concordance. The reported odds ratio is the probability of being in a lower category (i.e., better concordance) compared to a higher category (i.e., worse concordance). The outcome categories for LDL were the following: 0) LDL measurement and LDL <100 mg/dl, 1) LDL measurement, but LDL≥100 mg/dl, and 2) no LDL measurement. The outcome categories for BP were the following: 0) SBP<140 and DBP<90 mm Hg; 1) SBP≥140 or DBP≥90 mm Hg, and 2) no BP measurement. #Candidate covariates included all Table 1 and 2 variables. &Presence of cerebrovascular and/or peripheral vascular disease |
||
|
Ho et al. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 2006 6:6 doi:10.1186/1471-2261-6-6 |
||