Peer Review reports
From: Manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An experimental study in pigs
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 8 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Irene Lang |
| 10 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sten Rubertsson |
| 20 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Stig Steen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 20 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 10 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Irene Lang |
| 10 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sten Rubertsson |
| 10 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Stig Steen |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 10 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 20 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sten Rubertsson |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Oct 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 Oct 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2261-10-53 |
You can find further information about peer review here.