Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 26 Apr 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Myles |
| 12 May 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Scott Beattie |
| 12 Jul 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Moore |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 12 Jul 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 11 Aug 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Vickers |
| 18 Aug 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Moore |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 18 Aug 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 24 Aug 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Vickers |
| 11 Sep 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Moore |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 11 Sep 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 12 Sep 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Moore |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 12 Sep 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 Sep 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 12 Sep 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2253-6-10 |
You can find further information about peer review here.