Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Randomized comparison of the i-gel™, the LMA Supreme™, and the Laryngeal Tube Suction-D using clinical and fibreoptic assessments in elective patients

Original Submission
7 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Volker Dörges
9 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luis Gaitini
4 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Sebastian G. Russo
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Volker Dörges
19 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luis Gaitini
15 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Sebastian G. Russo
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Volker Dörges
10 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luis Gaitini
7 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Sebastian G. Russo
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Sebastian G. Russo
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
7 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2253-12-18

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page