Skip to main content
Download PDF

Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of Superroot-derived Lotus corniculatus plants: a valuable tool for functional genomics

BMC Plant Biology volume 9, Article number: 78 (2009) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Transgenic approaches provide a powerful tool for gene function investigations in plants. However, some legumes are still recalcitrant to current transformation technologies, limiting the extent to which functional genomic studies can be performed on. Superroot of Lotus corniculatus is a continuous root cloning system allowing direct somatic embryogenesis and mass regeneration of plants. Recently, a technique to obtain transgenic L. corniculatus plants from Superroot-derived leaves through A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation was described. However, transformation efficiency was low and it took about six months from gene transfer to PCR identification.

Results

In the present study, we developed an A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation of Superroot-derived L. corniculatus for gene function investigation, combining the efficient A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation and the rapid regeneration system of Superroot. The transformation system using A. rhizogenes K599 harbouring pGFPGUSPlus was improved by validating some parameters which may influence the transformation frequency. Using stem sections with one node as explants, a 2-day pre-culture of explants, infection with K599 at OD600 = 0.6, and co-cultivation on medium (pH 5.4) at 22°C for 2 days enhanced the transformation frequency significantly. As proof of concept, Superroot-derived L. corniculatus was transformed with a gene from wheat encoding an Na+/H+ antiporter (TaNHX2) using the described system. Transgenic Superroot plants were obtained and had increased salt tolerance, as expected from the expression of TaNHX2.

Conclusion

A rapid and efficient tool for gene function investigation in L. corniculatus was developed, combining the simplicity and high efficiency of the Superroot regeneration system and the availability of A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation. This system was improved by validating some parameters influencing the transformation frequency, which could reach 92% based on GUS detection. The combination of the highly efficient transformation and the regeneration system of Superroot provides a valuable tool for functional genomics studies in L. corniculatus.

Background

Legume crops are economically important in supplying oil and protein for human consumption and animal forage, and are also major contributors to the global nitrogen cycle due to their unique ability of symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Besides their agricultural importance, legumes also produce a variety of beneficial secondary compounds, many of which have been proved to have health-promoting properties such as providing protection against human diseases [1, 2].

Plant transformation is a useful tool in molecular analysis of gene function and limited transformation capability constitutes a significant barrier in making advances in our understanding of gene functions [3]. In legumes, A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation is the method of choice to test gene functions [4]. However, many cultivated grain legumes are still recalcitrant to current transformation technologies or show low transformation frequencies which limit their potential as objects for gene functional studies [5].

A. rhizogenes, a soil-borne bacterium, causes the production of hairy roots at the wounding sites. It transfers T-DNA from the Ri plasmid into the plant genome and also T-DNA of the binary vector when co-transferred [6, 7], allowing the integration of a foreign gene. Hairy roots have the unique property of being able to grow in vitro in the absence of exogenous plant growth regulators [8]. These growth characteristics and the high transformation frequency of A. rhizogenes have made the production of 'composite plants' in vitro and ex vitro a tool to test gene functions for root biology [8–10]. However, it does not allow assessing gene function on the whole plant level because of the non-transformed shoot parts. Additionally, not all the hairy roots are co-transformed [11], which makes the analyses complicated.

L. corniculatus is a perennial, fine-stemmed, leafy legume that has become of increased importance in agriculture as pasture and hay crops in recent years. It has the potential to become a major crop replacing white clover and alfalfa in temperate forage-producing regions of the world, because of its high nutritive value and its tolerance to adverse environmental conditions. A unique in vitro culture system of long-lived Superroot was reported in the legume L. corniculatus [12]. This system allows continuous root cloning, direct somatic embryogenesis and mass regeneration of plants without addition of exogenous plant growth regulators [13, 14]. However, direct transformation of Superroot was unsuccessful, thus limiting its use. Recently, transgenic L. corniculatus was obtained from Superroot-derived leaves through A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation. However, the transformation efficiency was low, as calli were observed at the cuts of merely 56 leaf segments among 919 segments 50 days after transfer, and the process from gene transfer to PCR identification took six months [14]. Thus, the frequency and efficiency in A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Superroot-derived leaves still stand as a barrier for its extensive use.

In the present study, we developed a highly efficient A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation of Superroot-derived L. corniculatus, exploiting the combination of highly efficient A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation [5, 10] and the rapid and simple regeneration system of Superroot [12–14]. This system can be used to study gene functions on the whole plant level. The improved transformation was achieved by optimizing parameters that influence the transformation efficiency, such as explant type [15, 16] and pH of the co-cultivation medium (CCM) [17]. In order to further validate this system for gene function analysis, TaNHX2 [18], a gene from wheat encoding an Na+/H+ antiporter that plays an important role in plant salt tolerance [19, 20], was introduced into the Superroot of L. corniculatus and the salt tolerance of regenerated plants was assessed.

Results

Transgenic Superroot plants obtained from hairy roots induced by A. rhizogeneswith high efficiency

After being pre-cultured in MS medium (Figure 1A), the explants were infected with A. rhizogenes and then placed on solid CCM (Figure 1B). The explants were placed on 1/2 MS medium to induce the hairy roots after co-cultivation. Seven days later, hairy roots began to appear at the wounding sites of the explants (Figure 1C). When the hairy root grew to a length of 3 to 4 cm, each individual hairy root was labelled with numbers and an approximately 1 cm long segment was cut axenically from each hairy root to be used for GFP and GUS detection. The hairy roots thus identified as GUS and GFP positive were then excised from the original explants and transferred to the regeneration medium (RM). Nearly 100% of the hairy roots regenerated into shoot buds or plantlets about 25 days later (Figure 1D). The shoot buds were transferred to MS medium without any plant growth regulators for stem elongation and rooting (Figure 1E and 1F). Transgenic L. corniculatus plants were obtained in about two and a half months and the regenerated plants had a typical hairy root phenotype with short internode and wrinkled leaves (Figure 1G).

Figure 1
figure 1

Transgenic L. corniculatus cv. Superroot plants obtained from hairy roots induced by A. rhizogenes. Obtainment of transgenic L. corniculatus cv. Superroot by A. rhizogenes mediated transformation. Pre-cultivation of explants on MS medium (A). Co-cultivation of explants after infection with A. rhizogenes (B). Hairy roots began to appear at the wounding sites of the explants about 7 days after being transferred onto 1/2 MS medium. Pictures were taken 14 days after the first appearance of hairy roots (C). Plantlets/shoots regenerated from hairy roots on the RM 4 weeks later (D). Shoots were transferred onto MS medium for elongation (E). Shoot elongation and root formation about 4 weeks after being transferred onto MS medium (F). Comparison between transgenic L. corniculatus by A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation (left) and wild type plant (right) (G).

Full size image

Molecular characterization of transgenic hairy roots and regenerated plants

The hairy roots identified as being transgenic by GUS staining (Figure 2A) and GFP detection (Figure 3A) were transferred to RM for shoot induction. PCR analysis of the regenerated plants was performed with primers designed to amplify GUS and GFP fragments, respectively. The PCR results showed the presence of GUS (Figure 2B) and GFP (Figure 3C) bands of the expected sizes (750 and 641 bp, respectively) in the corresponding transgenic samples and their absence in the negative controls, indicating that all the positively transgenic hairy root-derived plants contained both the GFP and GUS genes.

Figure 2
figure 2

GUS detection of hairy root and regenerated transgenic plants. ×10 micrograph showing GUS staining of hairy root. Left panel, transgenic hairy root; right panel, negative control (A). PCR-amplification of GUS in regenerated plants (B). M, 1 kb DNA marker; 1, plasmid DNA; 2, negative control; 3–7, transgenic regenerated plants. ×20 micrograph showing GUS staining of leaf from a regenerated plant. Left panel, transgenic leaf; right panel, negative control (C). GUS staining of a regenerated transgenic plant (left) and a negative control (right) (D). Southern blot analysis of regenerated plants using a 750-bp GUS fragment as a probe (E). P, Hind III-digested pGFPGUSPlus plasmid DNA; 1, negative control plant; 2–7, randomly selected transgenic regenerated plants. All negative controls were hairy roots or regenerated plants obtained through transformation mediated by A. rhizogenes harbouring no binary vector.

Full size image
Figure 3
figure 3

GFP detection of hairy roots and regenerated transgenic plants. GFP-derived fluorescence detected by laser scanning confocal microscopy in a transgenic hairy root, scale bar = 70 μm (A) and in a negative control hairy root, scale bar = 300 μm (B). PCR-amplification of GFP in regenerated plants (C). M, 1 kb DNA marker; 1, plasmid DNA; 2, negative control; 3–7, transgenic regenerated plants. GFP-derived fluorescence detected by laser scanning confocal microscopy in a leaf from a regenerated plant, scale bar = 150 μm (D) and in a leaf from a negative control plant, scale bar = 150 μm (E). Western blot assay for the detection of GFP protein levels in independent transgenic plants using an anti-GFP antibody (F). 1, negative control plant; 2–8, independent transgenic plants. All negative controls were hairy roots or regenerated plants obtained by A. rhizogenes harbouring no binary vector mediated transformation.

Full size image

Southern blot analysis was also carried out to identify the transgenic events. Genomic DNA of regenerated plants was digested with Hind III which cuts at a single site within the T-DNA. Restriction-digested DNA was then blotted and hybridized with a 750 bp digoxigenin (DIG)-labelled GUS fragment as a probe. As shown in Figure 2E, the six randomly selected regenerated plants showed a different single integration event of the T-DNA, thereby confirming their independent transgenic nature. No hybridization signal was observed in the control plant.

To further verify gene transfer, GFP and GUS expression were monitored on the whole plant level. In contrast to 'composite plants', in which only roots are transformed, the whole plantlets regenerated from the hairy roots showed GUS staining (Figure 2C and 2D) and GFP fluorescence (Figure 3D). The transformation events were additionally confirmed by Western blot using an anti-GFP antibody. As shown in Figure 3F, Western blot indicated the presence of GFP in randomly selected 7 independent transgenic plants with a band of about 27 kDa and no signal was detected in the control plant.

Stem section with one node is the most suitable explant for transformation

Different types of explants may have diverse competence to A. rhizogenes infection. In the current study, root, leaf, internode and stem section with one node were used as explants to determine which type of explant is most suitable for A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation in Superroot L. corniculatus. The standard procedure described in Methods was used for this purpose with the preculture duration being one day, the nature of the explant being the only variable. As shown in Figure 4, the transformation frequency changed with explant types. The highest transformation frequency (74.64%) was obtained when the stem sections with one node were used as explants. In contrast, the transformation frequency was just 14.49% when roots were used as explants. The transformation frequency obtained with stem sections with one node as explants was significantly different (Fisher's Least Significant Difference (LSD) test; P < 0.05) to all other types of explants tested. Obviously, as the stem section with one node was the most suitable explant for A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation in L. corniculatus cv. Superroot, it was used to test the effects of other parameters on the transformation frequency.

Figure 4
figure 4

Selection of the most suitable explant for A. rhizogenes mediated transformation of L. corniculatus cv. Superroot. Root (A), internode (B), leaf (C) and stem section with one node (D) were used as explants for transformation to find the most suitable explant. Means of transformation frequencies were compared using a Fisher's LSD test (P < 0.05) and column bars with the same letter are not significantly different. The experiment was performed in independent triplicate and each experiment contained about 30 samples.

Full size image

Effects of pre-culture duration on transformation frequency

Recent reports suggest that pre-culturing may influence the transformation frequency [15, 17, 21]. Prior to infection with A. rhizogenes, stem sections with one node were pre-cultured in MS medium for a varying period from 0 to 6 days, after which the standard procedure described in Methods was used for the remaining part of the assay.

Transformation frequency differed depending on pre-culture time as shown in Figure 5. The results demonstrated that the transformation frequency could be improved after 1 to 3 days pre-culture. The highest transformation frequency (91.67%) was observed after a 2 days pre-culture and it was remarkably different from the other pre-culture duration (P < 0.05). The transformation frequency declined with an extended pre-culture time, with a 6-day pre-culture resulting in a decline of the transformation frequency to 51.11%. Thus, a 2-day pre-culture was used to test the effects of the following parameters on the transformation frequency.

Figure 5
figure 5

Effect of pre-culture duration on transformation frequency. A pre-culture duration ranging from 0 to 6 days was carried out to determine which one is most efficient. Means of transformation frequencies were compared using Fisher's LSD test and column bars with the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05. The experiment was performed in independent triplicate and each experiment contained about 30 samples.

Full size image

Effects of A. rhizogenescell density on transformation frequency

The growth status of A. rhizogenes may influence its virulence, and thereby the transformation frequency. To assess it, stem sections with one node, which were precultured for two days, were infected with different density of A. rhizogenes culture corresponding to OD600 = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0, respectively. They were subsequently treated as described for the standard procedure in Methods. The highest transformation frequency (89.64%) was obtained when A. rhizogenes cultures at the late-log stage were used, corresponding to OD600 = 0.6. At this OD600, transformation frequency increased significantly (P < 0.05) over all other tested cell concentrations (Figure 6).

Figure 6
figure 6

Effect of A. rhizogenes cell density on transformation frequency. A. rhizogenes cell density prior to inoculation was measured at OD600 nm. Column bars with the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 as determined using LSD test. The experiment was performed in independent triplicate and each experiment contained about 30 samples.

Full size image

Effects of co-cultivation conditions on transformation frequency

After infection, the explants were placed on the CCM to allow T-DNA transfer from the plasmid into plant cells. Several parameters concerning the co-cultivation were tested in order to assess their impact on transformation frequency. For co-cultivation duration, the stem sections with one node were precultured for two days, infected with A. rhizogenes corresponding to OD600 around 0.6 and then placed on CCM (pH5.4) at 24°C for 1, 2, 3 or 4 days. After this, the explants were placed on 1/2 MS medium for hairy root production. As shown in Figure 7A, the highest transformation frequency (91.54%) was achieved with a 2-day co-cultivation. The transformation frequency was lower at both shorter and prolonged co-cultivation. To test the effect of the pH of the CCM, the standard procedure as mentioned in Methods was used except that the pH of CCM was tested at 5.0, 5.2, 5.4, 5.6, 5.8 and 6.0. A CCM pH level of 5.4 was found to be optimal, which led to the transformation frequency of 86.15%. CCM pH below or above 5.4 resulted in the decrease of transformation frequency, with the lowest being 10.31% at a pH of 6.0 (Figure 7B). Growth temperature affects the virulence functions of many pathogenic bacteria [22]. To determine the influence of temperature during co-cultivation on transformation frequency, the standard procedure was used except that temperatures of 20°C, 22°C, 24°C, 26°C, 28°C and 30°C during co-cultivation were tested. It was found that 22°C was the optimum temperature for co-cultivation, with transformation frequency being 93.59% (Figure 7C). The transformation frequency markedly decreased with an increase in temperature, dropping to 52.84% and 28.93% when the temperature was 28°C and 30°C, respectively.

Figure 7
figure 7

Effects of co-cultivation conditions on transformation frequency. Effects of duration of co-cultivation (A), pH of CCM (B) and temperature during co-cultivation (C) on transformation frequency were determined. Column bars with the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 as determined using Fisher's LSD test. The experiment was performed in independent triplicate and each experiment contained about 30 samples.

Full size image

Hygromycin can be used as an efficient selection marker during plant regeneration

The effect of hygromycin on plant regeneration was also assessed. As shown in Figure 8, the regeneration frequency declined with an increase in hygromycin concentration. All roots can differentiate into shoot buds in RM without hygromycin and no difference was observed between transgenic and negative control roots (Figure 8A). When 2 mg/L hygromycin was added, 100% of the transgenic roots and still about 70% of the negative transgenic roots differentiated (Figure 8B). When 4 mg/L hygromycin was added into the RM, all negative control roots died. However, about 80% of the transgenic roots could still differentiate (Figure 8C). Few transgenic roots survived and differentiated into shoot buds when 6 mg/L hygromycin was added into the RM (Figure 8D). As all negative control roots died when 4 mg/L hygromycin was added and all regenerated plantlets were GUS positive, it can be concluded that 4 mg/L hygromycin is efficient to select transgenic plants during plant regeneration. In addition, this assay indicates that hygromycin can be directly used for selecting transgenic hairy roots without prior GFP or GUS detection.

Figure 8
figure 8

Effects of hygromycin during plant regeneration. Hygromycin was added into the RM in the final concentrations of 0 (A), 2 (B), 4 (C) and 6 mg/L (D), respectively. The plate was divided into two regions. About 20 positively transgenic root segments were put onto the right half and similar numbers of control roots were put onto the left half. The pictures were taken 4 weeks after inoculation. Hairy roots developed by A. rhizogenes harbouring no binary vector were used as negative control.

Full size image

Validation of the gene function test system

In order to validate the gene function investigation system developed in the present study, pCMTaNHX2 was constructed (Figure 9A, lower panel). Transgenic hairy roots were obtained using stems section with one node as explants, 2-day pre-culture, infection with A. rhizogenes at OD600 = 0.6, co-cultivation on CCM (pH 5.4) at 22°C for 2 days. When all these optimal parameters were used, the transformation frequency could achieve 92%. Transgenic L. corniculatus plants were obtained in two and a half months (Figure 10). Southern blot analysis was performed to identify the transgenic events. Genomic DNA of regenerated plants was digested with EcoR I which cuts only once within the T-DNA. Restriction-digested DNA was then blotted and hybridized with a 728 bp DIG-labelled TaNHX2 fragment as a probe. As shown in Figure 9B, the six randomly selected transgenic regenerated plants showed a single integration event of the TaNHX2 gene thereby confirming their transgenic nature. No hybridization signal was observed in the control plant. GUS staining of the regenerated plantlets, with an example shown in Figure 9C, confirmed that T-DNA of the binary vector was integrated into the plant genome and GUS was expressed. No GUS expression was observed in the control plant. Four independent transgenic lines were randomly selected and the expression levels of TaNHX2 were monitored by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). Beta-tubulin (AY633708) was used as the reference gene. As expected, the transgenic TaNHX2 lines 1–4 expressed TaNHX2, whereas no expression was detected in the control plants (Figure 9D). In order to rapidly obtain a large number of transgenic TaNHX2 plants for salt tolerance assays, the plantlets regenerated from individual hairy root were cut into stem segments with one or two nodes and then inserted into MS medium for rooting. After 10–13 days, 90% segments produced roots. To test the salt tolerance of transgenic Superroot plants overexpressing TaNHX2, ten plantlets of each independent transgenic L. corniculatus line and the negative control were used. An example is shown in Figure 9E, the control plants grown for 15 days on MS medium (pH 5.8) containing 150 mM NaCl bleached, roots were stunted and plants were arrested in their growth. In contrast, the transgenic Superroot plants over-expressing TaNHX2 survived and exhibited healthy growth.

Figure 9
figure 9

Analysis of transgenic TaNHX2 events. Schematic representation of the T-DNA regions of pGFPGUSPlus (upper panel) and pCMTaNHX2 (lower panel) (A). The relative location of GUS Plus, HPT II and TaNHX2 are shown. LB, left border; T, polyA site; 2×35S, double CaMV35S promoter; N, nopaline synthase (NOS) terminator region; RB, right border. Southern blot analysis of regenerated transgenic lines using a 728-bp TaNHX2 fragment as a probe (B). P, EcoR I-digested pCMTaNHX2 plasmid DNA; 1, negative control plant; 2–7, randomly selected transgenic regenerated plants. Transgenic TaNHX2 lines were identified by GUS staining in regenerated transgenic TaNHX2 plant (left) and a negative control (right) (C). TaNHX2 expression was analyzed by RT-PCR in L. corniculatus cv. Superroot transgenic lines (D). A specific PCR product of 728 bp (upper panel) was detected in four randomly selected TaNHX2 (1–4) transgenic lines. 5, negative control; 6, PCR on a mixture of 1–5 RNA samples without reverse transcription. A 252 bp beta-tubulin fragment was amplified as an internal control (lower panel). Phenotypes of representative TaNHX2 transgenic (35S::TaNHX2) and control (CK) L. corniculatus plants after treatment with 150 mM NaCl for 15 days (E). All negative control plants were regenerated from hairy roots developed by A. rhizogenes harbouring no binary vector.

Full size image
Figure 10
figure 10

A flowchart for A. rhizogenes -mediated transformation of L. corniculatus cv. Superroot.

Full size image

Discussion

The production of transgenic plants is useful for investigating gene functions [23]. The rapid ongoing progress in functional genomic studies has increased the demand of highly efficient transformation systems for legumes [24]. The development of an efficient genetic transformation technology will facilitate physiological and molecular biology studies in L. corniculatus and the transgenic Superroot system will also be useful as a plant expression factory [14].

High-frequency production of transgenic plants relies on the highly efficient T-DNA delivery from Agrobacterium into plant cells [24], selection of transgenic cells and plant regeneration [25]. In the present study, A. rhizogenes K599 [5, 8, 9] harbouring pGFPGUSPlus [26] was used to optimize the transformation of Superroot-derived L. corniculatus plants. pGFPGUSPlus is an efficient transformation vector with two reporter genes, GFP and GUS, simplifying the identification of the transfer events. Hygromycin, an efficient selection agent for plant transformation [25], has been proved to be efficient in selecting the positive transgenic plants during plant regeneration in the present study too. As a matter of fact, only transgenic roots were able to differentiate into shoots and most of the transgenic roots produced plantlets when 4 mg/L hygromycin was added into the RM as shown in Figure 8. As all the plantlets able to regenerate on this selection medium expressed GUS and GFP, we propose that hygromycin can be used to select positively transgenic plants directly without GFP or GUS detection. This direct hygromycin selection saves time and reduces contamination.

The simplicity and high efficiency of the Superroot regeneration system [14] and the highly efficient selection system using pGFPGUSPlus make T-DNA delivery from Agrobacterium into plant cells a pivotal step in transgenic Superroot plant production. T-DNA delivery from Agrobacterium into plant cells is a complicated process which is influenced by many parameters such as Agrobacterium strain [11, 27], pre-culture duration [15, 21], explant type [15, 16], temperature [10, 22] and co-cultivation duration [15, 17]. Evidently, not all bacteria are virulent to given host plant cells and not all plant cells are competent for infection and regeneration [28]. Thus, the improvement of bacterium virulence and plant cell competence would enhance T-DNA delivery into plant cells. In the present study, the stem section with one node was identified as the most suitable type of explant as it allowed the highest transformation frequency compared with root, internode and leaf. This suggests that the susceptibility of explants to Agrobacterium is dependent on the physiological state of different tissues in the same plant. The highest transformation frequency was observed when stem section with one node was pre-cultured for 2 days prior to infection with A. rhizogenes and it declined with an extended pre-culture duration. A possible reason for this may be that long-time pre-culture decreased the viability of explants. Two days was also confirmed as the optimum co-cultivation duration whereas a 3 or 4-day co-cultivation may cause the overgrowth of A. rhizogenes leading to damage of the plant cells and consequently resulting in a low transformation frequency. On the other hand, a shorter co-cultivation time may disrupt A. rhizogenes cell proliferation, thereby reducing its virulence and leading to a low transformation frequency. These results are consistent with the reports in some other legumes, such as Lathyrus sativus [17], Cicer arietinum [29, 30] and Vigna mungo [31]. Gene transfer to plant cell is a temperature-sensitive process [22]. The highest transformation frequency was found when the co-cultivation was carried out at 22°C in this study. High temperature (over 26°C) led to less efficient transformation. The defect in transfer at high temperatures may be due to a reduced functionality of the T-DNA transfer machinery [32] or due to the fact that high temperature leads to a reduced level of virulence protein and hence bacterial virulence [22].

The high-throughput production of transgenic plants in a short time is important for gene function investigation, especially for plants where plant regeneration is a 'bottleneck'. Superroot, which was selected from 11 960 seeds at a 65% germination rate of L. corniculatus, showed faster growth and more vigorous embryogenic plant production on hormone-free medium [12]. The easy and efficient regeneration system of Superroot makes it a useful tool in gene function studies. However, direct stable transformation of Superroot was unsuccessful, hence limiting its use. Recently, transgenic Superroot of L. corniculatus were regenerated from Superroot-derived leaves using A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation [14]. However, the system in question takes six months from gene transfer to PCR analysis and the transformation efficiency was low. To date, the time-frame for the production of transgenic plants remains to be shortened in most species of the legume family capable of being transformed. For example, in L. japonicus, production of transgenic plants from hairy root cultures requires about 5–6 months. Even for the improved A. tumefaciens-mediated hypocotyl transformation, 4 months are needed for plant regeneration [33]. For Medicago truncatula, it generally takes 4 months to get transgenic plants [11]. In contrast, the obtainment of transgenic Superroot plants through the A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation described here requires only about two and a half months. Furthermore, as every transgenic root originates from a single cell [34, 35] and represents an independent transformation event, a great numbers of transformants can be obtained and analyzed in a relatively short period of time [9]. For Superroot in L. corniculatus, many plantlets can be obtained from one transgenic hairy root on the selective RM. Moreover, it is easy for L. corniculatus to propagate in culture, starting from shoot tips and node sections [36]. Roots from regenerated transgenic plants can also easily differentiate into shoots. Thus, this system is convenient for getting large numbers of transgenic L. corniculatus plants in a short time. All the following characteristics allow A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation of Superroot-derived L. corniculatus plants to be considered as a useful platform for gene function investigation in L. corniculatus: 1) highly efficient and abundant production of transgenic hairy roots when Superroot-derived L. corniculatus plants are infected with A. rhizogenes K599; 2) regeneration of transgenic hairy roots into plantlets in one month; 3) fast and simple propagation process for L. corniculatus.

To validate this platform for gene function investigation, transgenic Superroot-derived L. corniculatus plants overexpressing TaNHX2 were obtained via the optimized A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation system developed in the present study and their salt tolerance was assessed. Transgenic L. corniculatus survived and grew in MS medium supplemented with 150 mM NaCl whereas the control plantlets bleached and exhibited an inhibited growth. With the method described here, it took about three months to assess the function of TaNHX2 on the whole plant level and thus may save a lot of time in comparison to similar studies in other plant species [11, 33].

A. rhizogenes-mediated hairy root production has been widely used for root biology. Coupled with the fast, simple and highly efficient regeneration system of Superroot-derived L. corniculatus plants, we developed a rapid and highly efficient platform for gene function investigation in L. corniculatus and validated its utility by assessing the function of TaNHX2. However, some shortcomings of this system still remain. L. corniculatus is allopolyploid, self-sterile and a poor seed producer [13] and may therefore be of limited use for studies of genes involved in processes such as flower development. Nevertheless, this system should still be recommended for many other research fields, such as stress physiology, secondary metabolic biology and root biology.

Conclusion

A rapid and highly efficient production of transgenic Superroot-derived L. corniculatus plants through A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation was developed, combining the simplicity and efficiency of the Superroot regeneration system and the highly efficient A. rhizogenes mediated transformation. The transformation frequency can reach 92% based on the detection of GUS activity. This system was improved by validating some parameters which may influence transformation frequency. The fast and highly efficient transformation and regeneration system of Superroot-derived L. corniculatus provides a powerful tool for gene function testing in L. corniculatus in a short time.

Methods

Plant material

Superroot culture of L. corniculatus was provided by Dr. Ryo Akashi and was propagated in liquid MS medium. Roots were then placed onto MS medium with 0.5 mg/L 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA) for shoot induction. The shoots were excised and transferred to solid hormone free MS medium for seedling growth and rooting [12, 13].

Bacterial strain and binary vector

Cucumopine-type A. rhizogenes strain K599 with pGFPGUSPlus was used to transform Superroot-derived L. corniculatus plants. This binary vector has two reporter genes: β-glucuronidase (uidA) and GFP, both of which are controlled by the constitutive cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter. The GUS reporter gene contains a catalase intron inside the coding sequence to ensure that expression of glucuronidase activity is derived from eukaryotic cells. The hygromycin phosphotransferase (HPTII) gene was also located between T-DNA borders, allowing the hygromycin selection of positive transformants. A. rhizogenes K599 which lacks the binary vector was used as negative control for the transformation.

Hairy root induction

A. rhizogenes K599 with pGFPGUSPlus was grown in dark at 28°C on agar-solidified LB medium supplemented with 50 mg/L kanamycin. To get fresh cells, a single bacterial cell colony was inoculated in liquid LB medium (20 ml) containing 50 mg/L kanamycin, cultured overnight and diluted with 1:1000 liquid LB medium. Segments of L. corniculatus cv. Superroot plants were immerged into the A. rhizogenes culture and shook (50 rpm) at 25°C for 30 min. The explants were dried on sterile filter paper and then transferred to CCM which was covered with a sterile filter paper. The CCM consisted of 1/10 MS, 3.9 g/L morpholino ethanesulfonic acid, 150 mg/L cysteine and 150 mg/L dithiothreitol. After co-cultivation, the explants were washed three times with sterile water and immerged in liquid 1/2 MS medium containing 250 mg/L cephalexin and 250 mg/L carbenicillin. The blot-dried explants were transferred to solid 1/2 MS medium with 250 mg/L cephalexin and 250 mg/L carbenicillin for hairy root induction.

Plant regeneration

Two-week old hairy roots, which were produced at the wounding sites of explants after they were transferred to solid 1/2 MS medium, were cut off and placed onto RM for shoot induction. The shoots were transferred to hormone free solid MS medium for shoot elongation and rooting.

Detection of GUS and GFPin transgenic plants by PCR

Genomic DNA was extracted from regenerated plants and GUS and GFP fragments were amplified by PCR to detect the transgenic events. The following sets of primer pairs were used for amplification. GUS: 5'-GATGATAGTTACAGAACCGACG-3' (forward), 5'-CATTCGGAATCTCCACGTTAC-3' (reverse).GFP: 5'-GTAAACGGCCACAAGTTCAGCG-3' (forward), 5'-TCGTCCATGCCGAGAGTGATCC-3' (reverse). 5 ng plasmid DNA was used as template for the amplification of positive control. Genomic DNA of regenerated plants derived from hairy roots induced by A. rhizogenes K599 harbouring no binary vector was used as negative control. The PCR conditions were as follows: 10 min at 94°C and 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 1 min at 60°C for GUS or 62°C for GFP and 45 s at 72°C, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The products of expected size for the two genes were verified by 2% agarose electrophoresis and SYBR Green staining.

Southern blot analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from regenerated plants. Approximately 40 μg of DNA from each sample was digested overnight with Hind III. 200 ng Hind III digested p35SGFPGUSPlus plasmid DNA was used as positive control. DNA fragments were separated by electrophoresis in 0.8% agarose gel, transferred to a Hybond-N+ (Amersham Biosciences) nylon membrane, and cross-linked by baking at 80°C for 2 h. The DIG-dUTP (Roche) labelled GUS gene (750 bp) was used as a probe and hybridization was carried out according to the manufacture's instruction of DIG high prime DNA labeling and detection starter kit II (Roche). A regenerated plant from hairy root developed by A. rhizogenes harboring no binary vector was used as negative control.

Histochemical localization of GUS and GFP expression

GUS staining was performed as previously described [37]. Briefly, the hairy roots and young seedlings were cut off and transferred to GUS staining solution (50 mM sodium phosphate at pH 7.0, 10 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mg/ml X-Gluc, 0.1 mM potassium ferricyanide, 0.1 mM potassium ferrocyanide and 20% methanol) and incubated at 37°C for 0.5–12 h. The staining solution was then removed and the tissues were destained by washing several times in 70% ethanol. GUS detection was observed on an Olympus BX51 microscope. GFP expression of the hairy roots and regenerated plants was detected by confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica, TCS SP2). A regenerated plant from hairy root developed by A. rhizogenes harboring no binary vector was used as negative control.

Protein extraction and Western blot for GFP detection

Plant tissue was homogenized in liquid N2 and the powder was transferred into a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube containing 100 μl extraction buffer of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH8.0), 120 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.2% Triton X-100, 5 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, 10 mM dithiothreitol and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and the tube was shaken vigorously at 4°C. After vortexing, the sample was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 30 min and the supernatant was used for the Western blot assay. The samples were boiled for 5 min in sample buffer and then centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min. The supernatant was separated by 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were transferred to a pyroxylin membrane (Amersham Biosciences) and GFP was detected using polyclonal anti-GFP antiserum (Sigma). A regenerated plant from hairy root developed by A. rhizogenes harboring no binary vector was used as negative control.

Determination of hygromycin selection level in plant regeneration

Roots of transgenic plants identified by GFP and GUS detection were cut into 2 cm fragments and placed onto RM containing different concentrations of hygromycin (0, 2, 4 and 6 mg/L) to find the optimum hygromycin for selection. Roots of transgenic plants derived from hairy roots that were induced by A. rhizogenes K599 harbouring no binary vector were used as negative control.

Evaluation of parameters influencing transformation efficiency

A range of parameters were evaluated including explant type (root, internode, leaf, stem section with one node), pre-culture duration in MS medium (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 days), OD600 value of the A. rhizogenes cell culture (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0), duration of co-cultivation (1, 2, 3 and 4 days), pH of CCM (5.0, 5.2, 5.4, 5.6, 5.8 and 6.0), temperature during co-cultivation (20, 22, 24, 26, 28 and 30°C). Referring to previous reports on A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation [10, 11, 38] and also A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation [11, 15, 39], the standard procedure, which was used to optimize parameters influencing the transformation frequency in the present study, was as follows. Stem sections with one node were precultured for two days (except for explant type parameter assay, in which four types of explant as mentioned above were used as explants and precultured for one day). They were then infected with an A. rhizogenes cell culture grown to an OD600 of 0.6 and co-cultivated on CCM (pH5.4) at 24°C for two days. After co-cultivation, the explants were washed with sterile water to remove excess Agrobacterium, and placed on 1/2 MS medium for hairy roots production. This standard procedure was used in all optimization assays, the only variable being the parameter to be optimized. The related description of each parameter assay is presented in the corresponding part of the Results section. All the parameters were tested in three independent transformation experiments and each experiment included three replicates, which consisted of about 30 explants each.

Validation of the gene function testing system by assessing the function of TaNHX2 in transgenic Superroot-derived L. corniculatusplants

The TaNHX2 cassette was double-digested by EcoR I and Hind III from pBIN438-TaNHX2, and then subcloned into the EcoR I/Hind III site of pGFPGUSPlus. The resulting binary construct was named pCMTaNHX2 and introduced into A. rhizogenes strain K599 via electroporation. Transgenic TaNHX2 L. corniculatus plants were obtained using the method developed in the present study. Genomic DNA of randomly selected transgenic plants and a control plant was digested by EcoR I and used in Southern blot analysis in order to confirm the transgenic event using a DIG-labelled TaNHX2 fragment (728 bp) as a probe. 200 ng EcoR I digested pCMTaNHX2 plasmid DNA was used as positive control. GUS staining was also carried out to identify the transgenic events and the transformation frequency was calculated by the percentage of GUS positive hairy roots. The transgenic hairy roots were placed on the RM for shoot buds induction. The expression levels of TaNHX2 were detected by RT-PCR using L. corniculatus beta-tubulin as an internal control. Briefly, total RNA was extracted using Trizol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instruction from four randlomly selected TaNHX2 transgenic lines and four control plants. cDNA synthesis was carried out using the RNA-free DNase-treated RNA following the instruction of the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). 2 μl first strand cDNA was used as template for PCR amplification. For negative control, a mixture of equal amount of cDNA from four control plants was used. The following sets of primer pairs were used for amplification: 5'-ACACTATTTGGTGCCGTTGG-3' (forward) and 5'-CTTCCAACCAGAACCAACCC-3' (reverse) for TaNHX2; 5'-TCTGATACTGTTGTGGAGCCT-3' (forward) and 5' TGGGATCAGATTCACTGCTAG-3' (reverse) for beta-tubulin. For TaNHX2, 35 cycles were used and for beta-tubulin, 28 cycles were used. In order to assess the salt tolerance of transgenic Superroot L. corniculatus overexpressing TaNHX2, individual positive transgenic TaNHX2 plants identified by GUS staining and also RT-PCR detection were cut into stem segments with one or two nodes and then inserted into MS medium for rooting. After 10–13 days, 90% segments produced roots. A regenerated plant from hairy root developed by A. rhizogenes harboring no binary vector was used as negative control. Ten plantlets of each independent transgenic L. corniculatus line and the negative control were transferred to MS medium (pH5.8) containing 150 mM NaCl. About 15 days later, the distinguishing phenotypes between the transgenic TaNHX2 plants and negative control plants were assessed.

Data processing

The transformation efficiency was calculated by the percentage of GUS positive explants over total explants having hairy roots. All data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The effects of parameters on the transformation efficiency were validated by Fisher's LSD test at P < 0.05 level. All the experiments were conducted in independent triplicate and each experiment contained about 30 samples.

Abbreviations

RM:

regeneration medium

CCM:

co-cultivation medium

DIG:

digoxigenin

LSD:

least significant difference

RT-PCR:

reverse transcription-PCR

6-BA:

6-benzylaminopurine

CaMV:

cauliflower mosaic virus

HPTII:

hygromycin phosphotransferase

SDS:

sodium dodecyl sulphate

SD:

standard deviation.

References

  1. Stark A, Madar Z: Phytoestrogens: a review of recent findings. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2002, 15 (5): 561-572.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Graham PH, Vance CP: Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiology. 2003, 131 (3): 872-877. 10.1104/pp.017004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor CG, Fuchs B, Collier R, Lutke WK: Generation ofcomposite plants using Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2006, 343: 155-167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Somers DA, Samac DA, Olhoft PM: Recent advances in legume transformation. Plant Physiology. 2003, 131 (3): 892-899. 10.1104/pp.102.017681.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Estrada-Navarrete G, Alvarado-Affantranger X, Olivares JE, Diaz-Camino C, Santana O, Murillo E, Guillen G, Sanchez-Guevara N, Acosta J, Quinto C, et al: Agrobacterium rhizogenes transformation of the Phaseolus spp.: a tool for functional genomics. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006, 19 (12): 1385-1393. 10.1094/MPMI-19-1385.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee MH, Yoon ES, Jeong JH, Choi YE: Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of Taraxacum platycarpum and changes of morphological characters. Plant Cell Reports. 2004, 22 (11): 822-827. 10.1007/s00299-004-0763-5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tomilov A, Tomilova N, Yoder JI: Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Agrobacterium rhizogenes transformed roots of the parasiticplant Triphysaria versicolor retain parasitic competence. Planta. 2007, 225 (5): 1059-1071. 10.1007/s00425-006-0415-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Collier R, Fuchs B, Walter N, Kevin Lutke W, Taylor CG: Ex vitro composite plants: an inexpensive, rapid method for root biology. Plant J. 2005, 43 (3): 449-457. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02454.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kereszt A, Li D, Indrasumunar A, Nguyen CD, Nontachaiyapoom S, Kinkema M, Gresshoff PM: Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of soybean to study root biology. Nature Protocols. 2007, 2 (4): 948-952. 10.1038/nprot.2007.141.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cao D, Hou W, Song S, Sun H, Wu C, Gao Y, Han T: Assessment of conditions affecting Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of soybean. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2009, 96: 45-52. 10.1007/s11240-008-9458-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Crane C, Wright E, Dixon RA, Wang ZY: Transgenic Medicago truncatula plants obtained from Agrobacterium tumefaciens-transformed roots and Agrobacterium rhizogenes-transformed hairy roots. Planta. 2006, 223 (6): 1344-1354. 10.1007/s00425-006-0268-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Akashi R, Hoffmann-Tsay S-S, Hoffmann F: Selection of a super-growing legume root culture that permits controlled switching between root cloning and direct embryogenesis. Theor Appl Genet. 1998, 96: 758-764. 10.1007/s001220050799.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Akashi R, Kawano T, Hashiguchi M, Kutsuna Y, Hoffmann-Tsay S-S, Hoffmann F: Super roots in Lotus corniculatus : A unique tissue culture and regeneration system in a legume species. Plant and Soil. 2003, 255: 27-33. 10.1023/A:1026143606752.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanaka H, Toyama J, Hashiguchi M, Kutsuna Y, Tsuruta S, Akashi R, Hoffmann F: Transgenic superroots of Lotus corniculatus can be regenerated from superroot-derived leaves following Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2008, 165 (12): 1313-1316. 10.1016/j.jplph.2008.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen L, Zhang B, Xu Z: Salt tolerance conferred byoverexpression of Arabidopsis vacuolar Na(+)/H(+) antiporter gene AtNHX1 in common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum). Transgenic Research. 2008, 17 (1): 121-132. 10.1007/s11248-007-9085-z.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Geier T, Sangwan RS: Histology and chimeral segregation reveal cell-specific differences in the competence for shoot regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in Kohleria internode explants. Plant Cell Reports. 1996, 15: 386-390. 10.1007/BF00232060.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Barik DP, Mohapatra U, Chand PK: Transgenic grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.): factors influencing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and regeneration. Plant Cell Reports. 2005, 24 (9): 523-531. 10.1007/s00299-005-0957-5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu JN, Huang J, Wang ZN, Zhang JS, Chen SY: An Na+/H+ antiporter gene from wheat plays an important role in stress tolerance. Journal of Biosciences. 2007, 32 (6): 1153-1161. 10.1007/s12038-007-0117-x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Apse MP, Aharon GS, Snedden WA, Blumwald E: Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis. Science. 1999, 285 (5431): 1256-1258. 10.1126/science.285.5431.1256.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Takahashi R, Liu S, Takano T: Isolation and characterization of plasma membrane Na(+)/H(+) antiporter genes from salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant reed plants. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2009, 166 (3): 301-309. 10.1016/j.jplph.2008.04.002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim KH, Lee YH, Kim D, Park YH, Lee JY, Hwang YS, Kim YH: Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Perilla frutescens. Plant Cell Reports. 2004, 23 (6): 386-390. 10.1007/s00299-004-0825-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Baron C, Domke N, Beinhofer M, Hapfelmeier S: Elevated temperature differentially affects virulence, VirB protein accumulation, and T-pilus formation in different Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Agrobacterium vitis strains. Journal of Bacteriology. 2001, 183 (23): 6852-6861. 10.1128/JB.183.23.6852-6861.2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Pereira A: A transgenic perspective on plant functional genomics. Transgenic Research. 2000, 9: 245-260. 10.1023/A:1008967916498.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ko TS, Lee S, Krasnyanski S, Korban SS: Two critical factors are required for efficient transformation of multiple soybean cultivars: Agrobacterium strain and orientation of immature cotyledonary explant. Theor Appl Genet. 2003, 107 (3): 439-447. 10.1007/s00122-003-1264-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Olhoft PM, Flagel LE, Donovan CM, Somers DA: Efficient soybean transformation using hygromycin B selection in the cotyledonary-node method. Planta. 2003, 216 (5): 723-735.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vickers CE, Schenk PM, Li D, Mullineaux PM, Gresshoff PM: pGFPGUSPlus, a new binary vector for gene expression studies and optimising transformation systems in plants. Biotechnology Letters. 2007, 29 (11): 1793-1796. 10.1007/s10529-007-9467-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chabaud M, de Carvalho-Niebel F, Barker DG: Efficient transformation of Medicago truncatula cv. Jemalong using the hypervirulent Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain AGL1. Plant Cell Reports. 2003, 22 (1): 46-51. 10.1007/s00299-003-0649-y.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. De Buck S, Jacobs A, Van Montagu M, Depicker A: Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformation and cotransformation frequencies of Arabidopsis thaliana root explants and tobacco protoplasts. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1998, 11 (6): 449-457. 10.1094/MPMI.1998.11.6.449.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kar S, Johnson TM, Nayak P, Sen SK: Efficient transgenic plant regeneration through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of chickpea (Cicerarietinun L.). Plant Cell Reports. 1996, 16: 32-37. 10.1007/BF01275444.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Husnain T, Malik T, Riazuddian S, Gordon MP: Studies on expression of marker genes in chickpea. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture. 1997, 49: 7-16. 10.1023/A:1005888814640.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Karthikeyan AS, Sarma KS, Veluthambi K: Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation of Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper. Plant Cell Reports. 1996, 15: 328-331. 10.1007/BF00232365.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fullner KJ, Nester EW: Temperature affects the T-DNA transfer machinery of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Journal of Bacteriology. 1996, 178 (6): 1498-1504.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Stiller J, Martirani L, Tuppale S, Chian R-J, Chiurazzi M, Gresshoff PM: High frequency transformation and regeneration of transgenic plants in the model legume Lotus japonicus. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1997, 48 (312): 1357-1365. 10.1093/jxb/48.7.1357.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bercetche J, Chriqui D, Adam S, David C: Morphogenetic and cellular reorientations induced by Agrobacterium rhizogenes (strains 1855, 2659 and 8198) on carrot, pea and tobacco. Plant Sci. 1987, 52: 195-210. 10.1016/0168-9452(87)90053-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Choi PS, Kim YD, Choi KM, Chung HJ, Choi DW, Liu JR: Plant regeneration from hairy-root cultures transformed by infection with Agrobacterium rhizogenes in Catharanthus roseus. Plant Cell Reports. 2004, 22 (11): 828-831. 10.1007/s00299-004-0765-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tomes DT: A tissue culture procedure for propagation and maintenance of Lotus corniculatus genotypes. Canadian Journal of Botany. 1979, 57: 137-140. 10.1139/b79-022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW: GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. The EMBO Journal. 1987, 6 (13): 3901-3907.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Henzi MX, Christey MC, McNeil DL: Factors that influence Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica). Plant Cell Reports. 2000, 19: 994-999. 10.1007/s002990000221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu SJ, Wei ZM, Huang JQ: The effect of co-cultivation and selection parameters on Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Chinese soybean varieties. Plant Cell Reports. 2008, 27 (3): 489-498. 10.1007/s00299-007-0475-8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Ryo Akashi at the Biological Resource Center in Lotus and Glycine, University of Miyazaki, Japan, for providing the Superroot culture of L. corniculatus; Professor Peter Gresshoff and Ms. Dongxue Li at University of Queensland, Australia, for A. rhizogenes strain K599 and the binary vector pGFPGUSPlus; Professor Shouyi Chen at Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, China, for providing the plasmid pBin438-TaNHX2; Miss Weiwei Yao for plant material preparation and technical assistance; Jiantian Leng for advice in data analysis; Jun Zhang for partial GUS detection. We especially thank Dr. Ralph Kissen and Dr. Tore Brembu at Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway, and Dr. Zhanyuan J. Zhang at University of Missouri-Columbia, USA, for critical review of this manuscript. This work was supported by National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2007AA10Z133), the Special Fund for Routine Research of Central Public Welfare-oriented Institutions (08206302-10), and Natural Science Foundation of China (30771358).

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI), Institute of Crop Sciences, The Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, PR China

      Bo Jian, Wensheng Hou, Cunxiang Wu, Bin Liu, Wei Liu, Shikui Song & Tianfu Han

    2. School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, PR China

      Bo Jian & Yurong Bi

    3. Current address: Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Realfagbygget, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway

      Bo Jian & Bin Liu

    Authors
    1. Bo Jian
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Wensheng Hou
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Cunxiang Wu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Bin Liu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Wei Liu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Shikui Song
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Yurong Bi
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Tianfu Han
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Tianfu Han.

    Additional information

    Authors' contributions

    BJ performed all the experimental procedures, data analysis, drafted and revised the manuscript. WH provided technical and partial financial support and revised the manuscript. CW took part in tissue culture. BL participated in GFP assay, GUS analysis, Western blot, figures preparation and manuscript revising. WL constructed pCMTaNHX2 and performed partial salt tolerance assay. SS assisted in plant material providing. YB revised the manuscript. TH supervised the study, revised the manuscript critically and gave financial support to the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Bo Jian, Wensheng Hou contributed equally to this work.

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Jian, B., Hou, W., Wu, C. et al. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of Superroot-derived Lotus corniculatus plants: a valuable tool for functional genomics. BMC Plant Biol 9, 78 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-9-78

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-9-78

    Keywords

    BMC Plant Biology

    ISSN: 1471-2229

    Contact us