Table 3 |
|||||
|
Homologies of linkage groups among different Eucalyptus sp. mapping studies that employed microsatellite markers. Localization of microsatellites derived and mapped from other Eucalyptus species [17, 44] and candidate genes [17], on the linkage groups of the consensus map of E. grandis and E. urophylla. The EMBRA microsatellites that allowed this analysis are listed in italics between parenthesis. |
|||||
|
Linkage groups (this study) |
Linkage groups Thamarus et al. [17] |
CSIRO Microsatellites Thamarus et al. [17] |
Candidate genes Thamarus et al. [17] |
Linkage groups Bundock et al. [44] |
CRC Microsatellites Bundock et al. [44] |
|
|
|||||
|
1 |
7 |
En006, Eg084, Eg065, Eg134, (EMBRA6) |
COMT, SAMS (est), Laccase (est) |
- |
- |
|
2 |
4a |
Eg008, Eg076, Eg111, Eg086, Eg096 |
EAP1, PAL |
- |
- |
|
3 |
8b |
Eg094, Eg098, Eg131 |
ECS1 |
- |
- |
|
4 |
11g |
Eg128, En011, Eg030 |
MsaS2 |
- |
- |
|
5 |
9 |
(EMBRA5) |
AGE2 |
3 |
EMCRC4, (EMBRA5), (EMBRA9) |
|
6 |
6c |
Eg015b, Eg062, En016, |
EXS2 |
- |
- |
|
7 |
2d |
Eg061, En012, En014 |
CCOAOMT, ECA1, XET(est) |
2 |
EMCRC9, (EMBRA7) |
|
8 |
1e |
Es076, En013, En015, Eg117, Eg126, En010 |
6 |
EMCRC8, (EMBRA3) |
|
|
9 |
5 |
Eg067, Eg089, Eg015a, Es140, Eg115 |
EXS2, |
1 |
EMCRC1, (EMBRA17, EMBRA18) |
|
10 |
10f |
Eg023, Eg091, Es115 |
CCR |
- |
- |
|
11 |
3 |
Eg099, Eg024, (EMBRA2) |
4CL, AGE1, ELF, SAMS (est) |
- |
- |
|
|
|||||
|
a Homology was established based on markers Eg086 and Eg096 mapped by Missiaggia [72] b Homology was established based on markers Eg094 and Eg098 mapped by Missiaggia [72] c Homology was established based on marker Eg062 mapped by Missiaggia [72] d Homology was established based on markers En014 mapped by Missiaggia [72] e Homology was established based on markers En010 and Eg126 mapped by Missiaggia [72] f Homology was established based on markers Eg091 mapped by Missiaggia [72] g Homology was established based on the fact that only linkage group 4 of this work and group 11 of Thamarus et al. [17] were left. |
|||||
|
Brondani et al. BMC Plant Biology 2006 6:20 doi:10.1186/1471-2229-6-20 |
|||||