Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Identification of wounding and topping responsive small RNAs in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum)

BMC Plant Biology volume 12, Article number: 28 (2012) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are two major classes of small RNAs. They play important regulatory roles in plants and animals by regulating transcription, stability and/or translation of target genes in a sequence-complementary dependent manner. Over 4,000 miRNAs and several classes of siRNAs have been identified in plants, but in tobacco only computational prediction has been performed and no tobacco-specific miRNA has been experimentally identified. Wounding is believed to induce defensive response in tobacco, but the mechanism responsible for this response is yet to be uncovered.

Results

To get insight into the role of small RNAs in damage-induced responses, we sequenced and analysed small RNA populations in roots and leaves from wounding or topping treated tobacco plants. In addition to confirmation of expression of 27 known miRNA families, we identified 59 novel tobacco-specific miRNA members of 38 families and a large number of loci generating phased 21- or 24-nt small RNAs (including ta-siRNAs). A number of miRNAs and phased small RNAs were found to be responsive to wounding or topping treatment. Targets of small RNAs were further surveyed by degradome sequencing.

Conclusions

The expression changes of miRNAs and phased small RNAs responsive to wounding or topping and identification of defense related targets for these small RNAs suggest that the inducible defense response in tobacco might be controlled by pathways involving small RNAs.

Background

Small RNAs are a group of regulatory molecules that fall into two major classes, microRNAs (miRNAs) and short interfering RNAs (siRNAs). They play important roles in biological systems in eukaryotes by suppressing expression of target genes at the transcriptional and/or post-transcriptional level through specific base pairing with their targets [1]. In plants, siRNAs are further classified into trans-acting siRNAs (ta-siRNAs), natural antisense transcript-derived siRNAs (nat-siRNAs), and repeat-associated siRNAs (ra-siRNAs) [2]. In addition, a novel class of bacteria-induced 30- to 40-nt endogenous small RNAs, long siRNAs (lsiRNAs), was identified in Arabidopsis [3].

As an important group of small RNAs, miRNA has attracted much attention. A number of studies have been performed to reveal the biogenesis of miRNAs and the mechanisms of miRNA-mediated gene regulation [4–6]. In plants, miRNA derives from primary miRNA transcript (pri-miRNA), which is transcribed by RNA polymerase II. After formation of a stem-loop secondary structure [7, 8], pri-miRNA is cleaved twice by DICER-LIKE1 (DCL1), a RNase III enzyme [9]. The first cleavage of DCL1 releases a miRNA precursor (pre-miRNA), and the second cleavage of DCL1 generates a pair of miRNA/miRNA* duplex. The mature miRNA targets mRNA by being incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) and plays a role in regulation of gene expression [4], while miRNA*, the complementary strand of the mature miRNA, is usually degraded and applies no function [10] although functional miRNA* has been reported [11]. In plants, miRNAs have been demonstrated to be involved in many biological and metabolic processes, including developmental regulation, growth control, cell differentiation, signal transduction, and biotic and abiotic stresses [5, 12–15]. For example, miR172 regulates floral organ identity and flowering time by cleavage and/or translational repression of AP2-domain containing genes [16–18]; miR159 has been shown to be required for normal anther development by mediating the expression of GAMYB-related genes [19].

Unlike miRNAs, endogenous siRNAs arise from loci, in which double-stranded RNAs are able to be formed by the action of RNA-dependent polymerase or by two convergent transcripts. ta-siRNAs are 21-nt phased small RNAs and function like miRNAs. TAS3 is conserved in many plant species. In Arabidopsis and rice four and three TAS loci have been identified, respectively [20–22]. Besides ta-siRNAs, other types of phased small RNAs have also been reported recently, such as miRNA-like siRNAs from long hairpin [23] and phased small RNAs from superclusters flanked by a common 22-nt motif targeted by miR2118 [24].

As the major compounds of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), nicotine alkaloids have defensive functions in response to pathogen infection and herbivore wounding. Studies on alkaloids have been focused on the harm of smoking cigarettes and addictions to nicotine [25, 26]. The potential use of nicotine alkaloids as insecticides in agriculture has also been investigated [27]. Nicotine alkaloids are synthesized in tobacco roots and delivered to leaves through the plant transport systems, consequently nicotine alkaloids are mainly accumulated in leaves in most Nicotiana species [28, 29]. Nicotine biosynthesis can be induced through topping or leaf wounding to tobacco plants [30, 31] and significant increase of nicotine content was observed in the wounded tobacco plants [32]. In the past 20 years, a series of genes involved in the nicotine biosynthetic pathways have been identified, e.g. PMT (putrescine N-methyltransferase) [33, 34]; MPO (N-methylputrescine oxidase) [35]; QPT (quinolinate phosphoribosyltransferase) [36, 37] and A622 [38]. However, it is unclear whether samll RNAs are responsive to wounding and are involved in induction of nicotines upon wounding.

Over 4,000 miRNAs (miRBase Release 16, http://www.mirbase.org) and several kinds of siRNAs have been identified in plants. Recently, identification of known conserved miRNAs has been reported in tobacco [39, 40]. However, no tobacco-specific miRNA has been experimentally isolated. In this study, we intend to experimentally indentify miRNAs and siRNAs in the tobacco genome, especially small RNAs responsive to damages through high-throughput sequencing of small RNA populations from wounding or topping treated tobacco plants. To identify potential targets of small RNAs, a degradome from wounding treated plants was sequenced. As a result, 159 known and novel tobacco-specific miRNAs together with a number of loci generating phased small RNAs were identified. Expression levels of some of these small RNAs were changed after wounding or topping treatment, suggesting that these small RNAs may play a defensive role in response to wounding or topping damage in tobacco.

Results

Deep sequencing reveals a diverse set of tobacco small RNAs

To get insight into the composition of small RNA populations and their changes after damage treatments in tobacco, we isolated small RNAs from roots and leaves of leaf-wounding-treated plant, roots of topping-treated plant and roots of untreated plant. Small RNAs were then sequenced using the Illumina high-throughput sequencing technology. A total of 18.5 million of raw reads (15-35 nt) were generated from four samples (Table 1). Similar to previous reports on small RNA cloning in other plant species, 20-24-nt reads were dominated in all four small RNA populations with the 24-nt small RNAs the most abundant species (Figure 1). Of the 20-24-nt reads, 42.2% and 20.7% were perfectly mapped to the Tobacco Genome Initiative (TGI) GSS and EST datasets (see Methods). Many small RNAs were singletons or observed only in one sample. Less than 3% of the small RNA reads were common in all four samples. These results illustrate the complexity of the tobacco small RNA populations, which might partly be due to tetraploid characteristic of tobacco.

Table 1 Summary of high-throughput sequencing of tobacco small RNAs from root and leaf
Full size table
Figure 1
figure 1

Length distribution of small RNAs from different tissues and treatments. Y-axis: number of normalized small RNA reads (×105).

Full size image

Identification of miRNAs and loci generating phased small RNAs

miRNA identification

We searched miRBase for tobacco homologs of known miRNAs. As a result, homologs of 27 known miRNA families were found in our dataset. Based on BLAST search against the tobacco GSS and EST databases, we found that the mature miRNAs of these 27 known miRNA families match to 100 distinct GSS or EST sequences. All these sequences are able to form stem-loop structures; therefore they were considered as pre-miRNAs (Additional file 1: Table S1). Although 21 of these 27 miRNA families has been shown to be conserved in tobacco previously using a computational approach [31], our experimental approach confirmed the conservation of additional five miRNAs (miR408, miR477, miR1919, miR2118 and miR2911) in tobacco, which were not found computationally. Forty-four computationally identified tobacco miRNA families were not detected in our dataset, which could be because these miRNAs are lowly expressed and remain undetectable at the sequencing depth in our experiments or alternatively they are expressed in specific tissues that are not sampled in our experiments.

To identify novel tobacco miRNAs, we developed a miRNA discovery pipeline (see Methods). Using the custom-designed pipeline, we identified 59 novel tobacco miRNAs belonging to 38 families (Table 2; Additional file 1: Table S1). Of these 38 novel miRNA families, 20 families (53%) had a 21-nt mature miRNA sequences. Of these 20 families, 14 families (70%) had a mature miRNAs started with U. These results well supported the miRNA identity of these newly identified miRNAs. Of the 38 novel miRNA families, 13 families (34%) had a 22-nt mature miRNAs, which have been shown to be the secondary siRNA triggers [23, 41]. Whether these 22-nt novel miRNAs play a role in the biogenesis of secondary siRNAs is waiting to be investigated. Twenty-seven of the 38 novel miRNA families contain only one member, suggesting their relatively recent origin.

Table 2 Novel tobacco miRNAs identified in this study
Full size table

Identification of loci generating phased small RNAs

To identify loci generating phased small RNAs, small RNA clusters were first defined based on the number of small RNAs aligned to a certain length of sequence segment and the relative distance between neighbouring small RNAs [24]. Using the criteria mentioned in Methods, we identified 1,890-15,252 21-nt clusters and 11,726-107,765 24-nt clusters in four samples (Table 3). As expected, there were more 24-nt clusters than 21-nt clusters. These small RNA clusters were then analysed using the methodology described previously to see whether the small RNAs within these clusters distributed in a phased pattern, which was determined by a phase score[42]. A higher phase score indicates a stronger phase signal. With a phase score of 1.4 as suggested previously [42], we found that 189-3,098 and 1,359-20,112 loci were able to produce 21-nt and 24-nt phased small RNAs in four samples, respectively. The number of loci generating phased small RNAs was significantly reduced when the phase score was increased to 10 (Table 3). These loci are shown in Additional file 2: Table S2, and five representative loci generating 21-nt- or 24-nt-phased small RNAs are shown in Figure 2.

Table 3 Number of small RNA clusters and loci generating 21-nt- or 24-nt-phased siRNAs
Full size table
Figure 2
figure 2

Examples of loci generating phased 21-nt small RNAs (FH494072 and FH698163) and phased 24-nt small RNAs (ET713388, ET712651 and ET977252). The middle and the top graph in each locus represent the distribution of small RNA reads across the whole locus and the phase signals generated from the small RNA reads, respectively. Each arrow underneath the plot graph represents a 21-nt or 24-nt phase with the arrow direction indicating the forward or the reverse strand. The red arrows represent the phase with the highest number of small RNA reads. Target(s) of the phased small RNA corresponding to the red arrow, identified by degradome sequencing, are shown at the bottom of each graph.

Full size image

In plants, the typical loci generating phased siRNAs are TASs [20–22]. TAS3 with the miR390 cleavage sites has been found to be conserved in plants, including tobacco. In this study, we experimentally confirmed the conservation of TAS3 in tobacco. At least one TAS3 gene (GSS acc. no. FH434354) with two miR390 binding sites and generating the conserved ta-siARFs was confidently identified with a phase score of 31.3. We searched targeting sites of the newly identified miRNAs in this study in loci with a phase score over 10, and found several such loci were potentially targeted by Nta-miR15, Nta-miR22, Nta-miR31, Nta-miR33, Nta-miR36 or Nta-miR37(Additional file 2: Table S2). Whether these novel miRNAs are involved in biogenesis of the phased small RNAs observed is waiting to be investigated experimentally.

Identification of small RNA targets by degradome sequencing

Targets of miRNAs

Recently, degradome sequencing has been successfully applied to identify targets of miRNAs in Arabidopsis and rice [43, 44]. Taking the advantage of this new approach, we sequenced a degradome library constructed using total RNA isolated from roots of leaf-wounding treated tobacco plants. Over 14 million of raw reads were generated. Out of 685,411 unique clean reads (excluding reads with low quality and mapped to known house-keeping noncoding RNAs), representing ~11.8 million of raw reads, 55.2% (378,597) and 56.5% (387,518) were mapped to tobacco ESTs and GSSs, respectively. These mappable reads were then used for target gene identification using the CleaveLand pipeline as described [43, 45].

One or more targets were uncovered for 12 conserved and five tobacco-specific miRNA families (Additional file 3: Table S3). These targets were classified into five categories following the description indicated in the software CleaveLand 2. Six representative miRNA targets identified by degradome sequencing were shown in Figure 3. Fourteen targets of seven miRNA families were fallen into Category 0 and 1, for which the most abundant cleavage signal was detected at the expected miRNA-mediated cleavage sites. Functions of the conserved miRNA target genes are evolutionary conserved between different plants, including tobacco. For example, miR160 has been shown to regulate expression of ARF (auxin-response factor) genes in Arabidopsis and tomato [46, 47]. Our results showed that ARF is one of the potential targets of miR160 in tobacco, suggesting a conserved role of miR160 in tobacco. Similarly, conserved targets were also identified for miR171 (hairy meristem gene, a SCARECROW-like transcription factor) and miR172 (AP2-domain containing genes) (Additional file 3: Table S3). However, conserved miRNAs might have non-conserved function in tobacco, for instance, salicylic acid-induced protein 19, which has been reported to have multiple functions in defense response in tobacco [48], was the only target found for miR164, suggesting that miR164 could be part of the defensive pathway involving the salicylic acid signal.

Figure 3
figure 3

Plot signals of the candidate targets of miRNAs predicted by degradome sequencing. Targets of conserved miRNAs (miR160, miR171, miR172 and miR398) and tobacco-specific miRNAs (Nta-miR22 and Nta-miR32) are shown. The X-axis displays the nucleotide position of the target genes. The Y-axis indicates the abundance of reads converted into transcripts per 10 million (TP10M). Each circle represents a degradome fragment mapped to the target gene and the circle indicated by the red arrow represents the expected miRNA cleavage product.

Full size image

The newly identified miRNAs were found to have diverse targets, but most of them seem to have a role in stress responses, suggesting that most of the newly identified miRNAs could function as regulators of defensive pathways in tobacco. For example, our degradome sequencing result showed that Nta-miR10 targets a gene encoding Avr9/Cf-9 rapidly elicited protein 4 (ACRE4), which plays a role in resistance to wounding and mechanical stress in tobacco [49]. Nta-miR38 targets genes encoding nematode resistance-like protein and ankyrin repeat containing protein, both are induced upon infection of disease [50, 51].

Targets of phased small RNAs

One of the phased small RNAs generated from the TAS3 locus is ta-siARF, which targets ARF genes that influence leaf morphology and lateral root growth [52, 53]. To know whether the phased small RNAs identified in this study, like ta-siARF, are able to regulate expression of other genes, we checked the presence of potential targets of the most abundant 30 phased small RNAs observed in the damage-treated samples in our degradome sequencing dataset. We found targets for five (two 21-nt and three 24-nt) of the 30 selected phased small RNAs (Figure 2; Additional file 4: Table S4). For example, the D2(-) phased small RNA from locus FH494072, which was specifically detected in wounding or topping treated samples, was found to target an hypothetical protein; the D4(+) phased small RNA from locus ET712651 was found to target several genes with diverse functions, including putative disease resistance protein, dicer-like protein and type-A phytochrome.

We did gene ontology (GO) analysis for the target genes of miRNAs and phased small RNAs. Although miRNAs and phased small RNAs had most of their targets grouped into the same GO terms, including response to stimulus and immune system process, it seems that miRNAs and the phased small RNAs are targeting specific genes involved in reproduction (for miRNAs) and cellular component biogenesis and organization (for the phased small RNAs), respectively (Figure 4), suggesting a unique role of miRNAs and the pahsed small RNAs in these processes.

Figure 4
figure 4

Gene ontology analysis of the targets of miRNAs and the phased small RNAs.

Full size image

Small RNAs responsive to topping and wounding treatments

Topping and wounding responsive miRNAs

In order to compare expression levels of small RNAs in different samples, the abundance of each unique small RNA was normalized by converting the absolute read numbers to relative read numbers (reads per million) based on the total number of reads in each library. To get insight into the potential role of miRNAs in response to damage treatments, we compared the expression changes of all miRNAs detected in our datasets. Most of the miRNAs identified in this study changed their expression upon topping or wounding treatment. Eight conserved and seven newly identified miRNAs showed significant up-regulation or down-regulation upon damage treatment (Figure 5). Out of the eight conserved miRNAs, miR159, miR164, miR167 and miR172 have been previously shown to be stress-responsive [15]. miR164 and miR168 were significantly induced in roots by both topping and wounding treatments. miR172 and miR390 were significantly induced only in roots treated by wounding. Furthermore, miR159, miR319 and miR2911 were up-regulated only in topping treated sample while were down-regulated or remaining unchanged in wounding treated sample. These results indicate different miRNA families behave differently upon damage treatment, suggesting a different role of these miRNAs in response to damage treatment in tobacco. In addition, seven conserved miRNA families (miR169, miR395, miR397, miR398, miR399, miR408 and miR827) were not detected in the untreated tobacco root sample but were detected in at least one damage treated sample (Additional file 1: Table S1). Among these miRNAs, miR395 and miR398 have been shown to response to a variety of stresses [15].

Figure 5
figure 5

Heat map showing miRNAs with a significant expression change upon wounding or topping treatment in roots.

Full size image

To confirm the deep sequencing results, the expression levels of miR156a, miR157 and miR164a were analysed using northern blot. According to northern results, the expression levels of miR164a and miR156a were higher in roots than in leaves, while the expression levels of miR157 were higher in leaves than in roots (Figure 6), consistent with the deep sequencing results (Additional file 1: Table S1); however, for miR164a, the induction detected by northern analysis was not as significant as that detected by deep sequencing; for miR156a and miR157, a discrepant result was observed in the wounding treated root samples between deep sequencing and northern analysis (Figure 6; Additional file 1: Table S1). The induction observed in deep sequencing results could be an artifact caused by biased adaptor ligation and PCR amplification during the procedure of small RNA library construction.

Figure 6
figure 6

Northern blot analysis of miRNA expression. LC: control leaves; RC: control roots; RW: roots from leaf wounded plants; RT: roots from topping treated plants; LW: leaves from leaf wounded plants. Tobacco U6 was served as a loading control.

Full size image

Out of the 38 newly identified miRNA families, 27 were relatively highly expressed, particularly Nta-miR9, Nta-miR17 and Nta-miR26 (Table 2). Northern analysis of Nta-miR9 showed that this novel miRNA is highly expressed in roots but lowly expressed in leaf, consistent with the deep sequencing results. Nta-miR9 was highly induced by wounding in leaves and slightly induced in roots from the topping treated plants (Figure 6), but a reduction of this miRNA in roots from the wounding treated plants detected by deep sequencing was not detected by northern analysis, which could be because of cross hybridization of other members of this miRNA family that failed to be detected by deep sequencing. The discrepancy observed between deep sequencing and northern blot analysis suggests that caution must be taken when directly compare small RNA expression levels observed by either approach.

Nta-miR1, Nta-miR4c and Nta-miR25 were highly induced in roots by both wounding and topping treatments; Nta-miR26 was highly induced only in topping treated sample (Figure 5). Nine newly identified miRNA families (Nta-miR15, Nta-miR21-22, Nta-miR29, Nta-miR31-32 and Nta-miR35-37) were not expressed in the untreated roots but were detected in damage treated samples. Different members of the same miRNA family could behave differently upon damage treatment, for example, Nta-miR4a.2 was highly induced by damage treatment, whereas Nta-miR4a.1 and miR4b were not induced.

Topping and wounding responsive phased small RNAs

Generally, the number of small RNA clusters was much higher in the damage treated samples (Table 3), indicating a number of small RNAs could be induced by these treatments. The number of loci generating both 21-nt- and 24-nt-phased small RNAs increased dramatically after topping or leaf-wounding treatment. Some of these loci were found in two, three or all four samples, but some of them were unique to each treatment (Figure 7). Similar to what has been found for miRNAs, wounding treated root sample had the most abundant uniquely up-regulated loci that generate phased small RNAs (Figure 7). Two phased small RNAs were analysed using northern blot, but no signal was detected (data not shown), mainly due to their low expression levels.

Figure 7
figure 7

Venn diagram showing the number of loci (with a phase score over 1.4) generating phased small RNAs in four libraries. Blue and red numbers represent the number of loci generating 21-nt- and 24-nt-phased small RNAs, respectively.

Full size image

Discussion

Recent computational prediction identified 259 potential conserved tobacco miRNAs of 65 families [39], but computational prediction based on known miRNAs is unable to identify novel miRNAs and miRNAs expressed under specific conditions, such as biotic and abiotic stresses. In this study, we used high-throughput sequencing approach to experimentally confirm expression of the known miRNAs and their changes upon wounding or topping treatment, and to identify novel tobacco-specific miRNAs. Our study detected the expression of 100 known miRNAs (belonging to 27 families) in tobacco roots and leaves, including miR408, miR477, miR1919, miR2118 and miR2911 that was not previously computationally identified. More importantly, our work identified 59 novel tobacco-specific miRNAs (belonging to 38 families).

Upon damage treatments, eight conserved and seven newly identified miRNAs showed significant up-regulation or down-regulation (Figure 5). In addition, seven conserved and nine newly identified miRNA families were only detected in the damage treated sample(s). The majority of these damage-responsive conserved miRNA families have been previously shown to be stress responsive in other plant species, suggesting that these miRNAs might also play a positive regulatory role in stress-tolerance in tobacco. In Arabidopsis, miR164 is essential for floral, leaf and root development [54, 55]. We found that this miRNA was induced in roots upon wounding or topping treatment (Table 2; Figure 6) and that one of the targets encodes a salicylic acid-induced protein; therefore, it is possible that miR164 is required for homeostasis of defensive proteins in tobacco. In addition, most targets of the newly identified miRNAs responsive to topping or wounding, found in the degradome sequencing results, seem to be regulators of various defensive pathways, implicating the importance of these miRNAs in stress responses in tobacco.

Different damages seem to have different effects on the expression of miRNAs and siRNAs. The abundance of small RNAs in the wounding treated leaf sample was generally much higher than that in the topping and wounding treated root samples, suggesting that the induction of small RNAs is more significant in the tissue where the damage was directly applied. Induction of small RNAs in roots collected from the leaf-wounding plants suggests that a mobile signal responsible for this induction is generated in leaves and transported to roots. This signal is most likely a type of phytohormone, such as salicylic acid, jasmonic acid or ethylene. However the exact nature of this signal is waiting to be resolved.

Silencing of RNA-directed RNA polymerase 1 (RdR1) makes Nicotiana attenuata highly susceptible to insect herbivores, suggesting the defense elicitation in Nicotiana attenuata is under the direct control of small RNAs [56]. Further investigation has found large-scale changes of small RNAs associated with insect elicitation [57]. Wounding is similar to insect herbivores and induction of small RNAs in the wounding treated tobacco plants is consistent with this recent finding. This result suggests that small RNAs could play a central role in reprogramming the tobacco transcriptome in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. It is unclear how the stress-transcriptome of tobacco has changed upon wounding or topping, but our work has provided bases for further investigation on roles of small RNAs in stress responses in tobacco.

In plants, TASs are the noncoding transcripts targeted by miRNAs to generate phased small RNAs. Recent investigation has demonstrated that the 22-nt miRNAs, rather than the 21-nt miRNAs, are the triggers for production of secondary phased small RNAs [41]. Out of the 38 newly identified miRNA families, 13 families have a 22-nt miRNA. In addition, we found that a large number of genomic regions in tobacco are able to produce phased 21-nt or 24-nt small RNAs and that a number of these regions containing potential binding sites of the newly identified miRNAs. Although we did not find these binding sites are enriched for 22-nt miRNAs, it is worth to perform further detailed analysis to see if the 22-nt miRNAs found in this study play a role in biogenesis of the secondary phased small RNAs.

Conclusions

Our study experimentally confirmed the conservation of a number of known miRNAs in tobacco, including conserved miRNAs that were not previously identified by computational prediction. Identification of damage-responsive miRNAs and phased small RNAs and defense related targets of these small RNAs suggest that the inducible defense responses in tobacco might be controlled by pathways involving small RNAs.

Methods

Plant materials and sample preparation

All tissue samples were collected from tobacco cultivar, Hicks Broad Leaf. Plants were grown in the growth room with a temperature of 22-25°C in order to minimize external affects on the biosynthesis of nicotine alkaloids. Three 40-day-old plants with roughly identical size were selected for the experiment. One was used for mechanical leaf wounding by making punctures on at least five fully expanded leaves, one was used for the topping treatment, and the third one as control (CK). After damage treatments, plants were kept for another 48 hours in the growth room before sample collection to allow occurring of damage induced responses. Roots were collected from the wounding and topping treated plants as well as the control plant. Leaf samples were collected from the wounding treated and control plants.

RNA isolation, small RNA and degradome sequencing

Tissues were ground into a fine powder in liquid nitrogen and total RNAs were extracted using the TRIzol® Reagent kit (Invitrogen). Four small RNA libraries (leaves and roots from the wounding treated plant, roots from the topping treated and the control plants) were constructed using the Small RNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina) [58, 59]. Briefly, small RNAs were fractionated on the 15% polyacrylamide, 8 M urea gel. The 18-25 nt portion of the gel was excised and small RNAs were eluted and purified using the nucleic acid purification kit (Axygen). Small RNAs were then sequentially ligated with a 5' RNA adapter (5'-GUUCAGAGUUCUACAGUCCGACGAUC-3') and a 3' RNA adapter (5'-pUCGUAUGCCGUCUUCUGCUUGUidT-3'). cDNA libraries were constructed through reverse transcription using SuperScript™ III (Invitrogen) and enriched by 15 cycles of PCR. The final PCR products were then purified using the PureLink™ PCR Purification Kit (Invitrogen) and sequenced using the SOLEXA genome analysis system. Primers used were: 5'-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGA-3' (RT primer), 5'- CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGA-3' (small RNA PCR primer 1), 5'-AATGATACGGCGACCACCGACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAGTCCGA-3' (small RNA PCR primer 2) and 5'-CGACAGGTTCAGAGTTCTACAGTCCGACGATC-3' (small RNA sequencing primer).

The degradome library was constructed according to a published protocol [60]. Briefly, RNA fragments with a poly(A) tail were isolated from total RNA of wounding treated leaves using the Oligotex mRNA mini kit (Qiagen), and then a 5' RNA adapter with a MmeI restriction site at its 3' end was added to the 5' ends of the isolated poly(A) RNAs. After reverse transcription using oligo d(T) and PCR enrichment, the PCR products were purified and digested with MmeI. After ligating a double-stranded DNA adapter to the 3' end of the digested products, the ligated products were further purified and amplified, and then sequenced using the Illumina GA II platform.

Tobacco sequences and other databases

The tobacco reference genomic (1,420,578 GSSs) and EST (80,783 generated from tobacco cultivar Hicks Broad Leaf by TGI) sequences were retrieved from GenBank. The nt database were downloaded from GenBank for annotation of the candidate miRNA genes and phased siRNA loci. Rfam 9.1 (http://rfam.janelia.org/) and RepBase 14.03 (http://www.girinst.org) were used for filtering known RNAs and repeat sequences. Transcription factor sequences of tobacco were retrieved from http://compsysbio.achs.virginia.edu/tobfac/ [61]. Genes involved in nicotine pathways were collected from previous studies [26–32]. miRNAs in miRBase 16.0 were used for identification of tobacco homologs of the known miRNAs (http://www.mirbase.org/).

miRNA identification

All small RNA data were processed by a suite of perl scripts. To identify candidate miRNAs, a pair of small RNAs located at the same GSS or EST and no more than 400-nt apart were selected and the sequence between these two small RNAs was subjected to prediction of stem-loop structure using the Vienna RNA package [62]. Candidates (pre-miRNAs) with an ideal hairpin structure containing the pair of small RNAs that is able to form a miRNA::miRNA* duplex with less than 4 mismatches and 2-nt of 3' overhangs were selected. Small RNAs aligned to these selected candidates were checked to eliminate the candidates with a smear distribution pattern of the small RNAs. For a certain miRNA family, candidates with any mismatch in mature miRNAs or more than 3 mismatches in pre-miRNAs were treated as different members. Redundant pre-miRNA sequences were eliminated.

Identification of loci generating phased small RNAs

The locations of small RNA clusters were pinpointed with the definition of a small RNAs cluster as a segment of sequence mapped by at least 9 distinct small RNAs and without other small RNAs in its flanking 100-bp regions [42]. A pipeline containing several perl scripts were then employed to identify loci generating phased siRNAs from the identified small RNA clusters [24].

Target identification by degradome sequencing

After adaptor trimming and filtering out the reads mapped to house-keeping noncoding RNAs, such as tRNAs, rRNAs, snRNAs and snoRNAs, 20-21-nt high quality reads were kept for further analysis. Targets of miRNAs and phased small RNAs were identified using the CleaveLand pipeline [45]. Briefly, 20-21-nt small RNA reads were first mapped to tobacco ESTs and GSSs separately with the SHRiMP program. The reference sequence fragments of 30 nt were then spliced to make sure the position with degradome reads mapped was included. Fragments were further analyzed to see if they are targeted by miRNAs. The fragments with an alignment cutoff value less than 7 were considered as candidate targets. The target genes identified by degradome sequencing can be classified into five categories based on the relative abundance of degradome transcripts mapped to the expected cleavage sites and other sites.

Northern blot analysis of miRNA expression

Total RNA was isolated from tobacco leaves and roots collected from plants treated with wounding or topping or untreated (control) using the TRIzol® Reagent kit (Invitrogen). Approximate 20 μg of total RNA was fractionated on a 15% denaturing gel for 2 hours and then transferred electrophoretically to the nylon membrane (Nytran SuperCharge membranes). Membranes were then UV cross-linked in a Straralinker 1800 Stratagene and baked for at least 2 hours at 80°C. DNA oligos complementary to miRNA sequences and labeled with digoxin were synthesized by Invitrogen. Membranes were prehybridized for 2 hours at 50°C using PerfectHyb™ Plus buffer (SIGMA) and then hybridized with digoxin-labeled probes for 16-20 hours at 42°C. Membranes were then washed three times (two times with 2 × SSC + 0.1%SDS and one time with 0.5 × SSC + 0.1%SDS) and sealed with the Blocking Solution (SIGMA) containing Anti-Digoxigenin-AP (Roche) for 1 hour. Membranes were finally incubated with Detection Buffer (0.1 M Tris-Cl, 0.1 M NaCl, pH9.5) and CSPD (Roche) for 5 min and exposed to X-ray films for 4 hours or overnight.

References

  1. Zamore PD, Haley B: Ribo-gnome: the big world of small RNAs. Science. 2005, 309 (5740): 1519-1524. 10.1126/science.1111444.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vazquez F: Arabidopsis endogenous small RNAs: highways and byways. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11 (9): 460-468. 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.07.006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Katiyar-Agarwal S, Gao S, Vivian-Smith A, Jin H: A novel class of bacteria-induced small RNAs in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2007, 21 (23): 3123-3134. 10.1101/gad.1595107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartel DP: MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004, 116 (2): 281-297. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mallory AC, Vaucheret H: Functions of microRNAs and related small RNAs in plants. Nat Genet. 2006, 38 (Suppl): S31-S36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Willmann MR, Poethig RS: Conservation and evolution of miRNA regulatory programs in plant development. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007, 10 (5): 503-511. 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.07.004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee Y, Kim M, Han J, Yeom KH, Lee S, Baek SH, Kim VN: MicroRNA genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase II. EMBO J. 2004, 23 (20): 4051-4060. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600385.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Parizotto EA, Dunoyer P, Rahm N, Himber C, Voinnet O: In vivo investigation of the transcription, processing, endonucleolytic activity, and functional relevance of the spatial distribution of a plant miRNA. Genes Dev. 2004, 18 (18): 2237-2242. 10.1101/gad.307804.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Reinhart BJ, Weinstein EG, Rhoades MW, Bartel B, Bartel DP: MicroRNAs in plants. Genes Dev. 2002, 16 (13): 1616-1626. 10.1101/gad.1004402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurihara Y, Watanabe Y: Arabidopsis micro-RNA biogenesis through Dicer-like 1 protein functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (34): 12753-12758. 10.1073/pnas.0403115101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang X, Zhao H, Gao S, Wang WC, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Huang HD, Raikhel N, Jin H: Arabidopsis Argonaute 2 regulates innate immunity via miRNA393(*)-mediated silencing of a Golgi-localized SNARE gene, MEMB12. Mol Cell. 2011, 42 (3): 356-366. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.04.010.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP, Bartel B: MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006, 57: 19-53. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105218.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Navarro L, Dunoyer P, Jay F, Arnold B, Dharmasiri N, Estelle M, Voinnet O, Jones JD: A plant miRNA contributes to antibacterial resistance by repressing auxin signaling. Science. 2006, 312 (5772): 436-439. 10.1126/science.1126088.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen X: Small RNAs - secrets and surprises of the genome. Plant J. 2010, 61 (6): 941-958. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04089.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Khraiwesh B, Zhu JK, Zhu J: Role of miRNAs and siRNAs in biotic and abiotic stress responses of plants. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aukerman MJ, Sakai H: Regulation of flowering time and floral organ identity by a microRNA and its APETALA2-like target genes. Plant Cell. 2003, 15 (11): 2730-2741. 10.1105/tpc.016238.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen XM: A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis flower development. Science. 2004, 303 (5666): 2022-2025. 10.1126/science.1088060.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhu QH, Helliwell CA: Regulation of flowering time and floral patterning by miR172. J Exp Bot. 2011, 62 (2): 487-495. 10.1093/jxb/erq295.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Achard P, Herr A, Baulcombe DC, Harberd NP: Modulation of floral development by a gibberellin-regulated microRNA. Development. 2004, 131 (14): 3357-3365. 10.1242/dev.01206.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Allen E, Xie Z, Gustafson AM, Carrington JC: microRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell. 2005, 121 (2): 207-221. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Peragine A, Yoshikawa M, Wu G, Albrecht HL, Poethig RS: SGS3 and SGS2/SDE1/RDR6 are required for juvenile development and the production of trans-acting siRNAs in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2004, 18 (19): 2368-2379. 10.1101/gad.1231804.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Vazquez F, Vaucheret H, Rajagopalan R, Lepers C, Gasciolli V, Mallory AC, Hilbert JL, Bartel DP, Crete P: Endogenous trans-acting siRNAs regulate the accumulation of Arabidopsis mRNAs. Mol Cell. 2004, 16 (1): 69-79. 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.028.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhu QH, Spriggs A, Matthew L, Fan L, Kennedy G, Gubler F, Helliwell C: A diverse set of microRNAs and microRNA-like small RNAs in developing rice grains. Genome Res. 2008, 18 (9): 1456-1465. 10.1101/gr.075572.107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson C, Kasprzewska A, Tennessen K, Fernandes J, Nan GL, Walbot V, Sundaresan V, Vance V, Bowman LH: Clusters and superclusters of phased small RNAs in the developing inflorescence of rice. Genome Res. 2009, 19 (8): 1429-1440. 10.1101/gr.089854.108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Benowitz NL: Pharmacology of nicotine: addiction, smoking-induced disease, and therapeutics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2009, 49: 57-71. 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094742.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Fagerstrom K: The epidemiology of smoking: health consequences and benefits of cessation. Drugs. 2002, 62 (Suppl 2): 1-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Steppuhn A, Gase K, Krock B, Halitschke R, Baldwin IT: Nicotine's defensive function in nature. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2 (8): E217-10.1371/journal.pbio.0020217.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Chintapakorn Y, Hamill JD: Antisense-mediated down-regulation of putrescine N-methyltransferase activity in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum L. can lead to elevated levels of anatabine at the expense of nicotine. Plant Mol Biol. 2003, 53 (1-2): 87-105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Saitoh F, Mona M, Kawashima N: The alkaloid contents of sixty Nicotiana species. Phytochemistry. 1985, 24 (3): 477-480. 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)80751-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Baldwin IT, Karb MJ, Ohnmeiss TE: Allocation of 15 N from nitrate to nicotine: production and turnover of a damage-induced mobile defense. Ecology. 1994, 75 (6): 1703-1713. 10.2307/1939630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kutchan T: Alkaloid biosynthesis-the basis for metabolic engineering of medicinal plants. Plant Cell. 1995, 7 (7): 1059-1070.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Baldwin IT: An ecologically motivated analysis of plant-herbivore interactions in native tobacco. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127 (4): 1449-1458. 10.1104/pp.010762.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hibi N, Higashiguchi S, Hashimoto T, Yamada Y: Gene expression in tobacco low-nicotine mutants. Plant Cell. 1994, 6 (5): 723-735.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hibi N, Fujita T, Hatano M, Hashimoto T, Yamada Y: Putrescine N-methyltransferase in cultured roots of hyoscyamus albus: n-butylamine as a potent inhibitor of the transferase both in Vitro and in Vivo. Plant Physiol. 1992, 100 (2): 826-835. 10.1104/pp.100.2.826.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Katoh A, Shoji T, Hashimoto T: Molecular cloning of N-methylputrescine oxidase from tobacco. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007, 48 (3): 550-554. 10.1093/pcp/pcm018.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sinclair SJ, Johnson R, Hamill JD: Analysis of wound-induced gene expression in Nicotiana species with contrasting alkaloid profiles. Funct Plant Biol. 2004, 31: 721-729. 10.1071/FP03242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sinclair SJ, Murphy KJ, Birch CD, Hamill JD: Molecular characterization of quinolinate phosphoribosyltransferase (QPRtase) in Nicotiana. Plant Mol Biol. 2000, 44 (5): 603-617. 10.1023/A:1026590521318.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Deboer KD, Lye JC, Aitken CD, Su AK, Hamill JD: The A622 gene in Nicotiana glauca (tree tobacco): evidence for a functional role in pyridine alkaloid synthesis. Plant Mol Biol. 2009, 69 (3): 299-312. 10.1007/s11103-008-9425-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Frazier TP, Xie F, Freistaedter A, Burklew CE, Zhang B: Identification and characterization of microRNAs and their target genes in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Planta. 2010, 232 (6): 1289-1308. 10.1007/s00425-010-1255-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim HJ, Baek KH, Lee BW, Choi D, Hur CG: In silico identification and characterization of microRNAs and their putative target genes in Solanaceae plants. Genome. 2011, 54 (2): 91-98. 10.1139/G10-104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen HM, Chen LT, Patel K, Li YH, Baulcombe DC, Wu SH: 22-Nucleotide RNAs trigger secondary siRNA biogenesis in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107 (34): 15269-15274. 10.1073/pnas.1001738107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Howell MD, Fahlgren N, Chapman EJ, Cumbie JS, Sullivan CM, Givan SA, Kasschau KD, Carrington JC: Genome-wide analysis of the RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE6/DICER-LIKE4 pathway in Arabidopsis reveals dependency on miRNA- and tasiRNA-directed targeting. Plant Cell. 2007, 19 (3): 926-942. 10.1105/tpc.107.050062.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Addo-Quaye C, Eshoo TW, Bartel DP, Axtell MJ: Endogenous siRNA and miRNA targets identified by sequencing of the Arabidopsis degradome. Curr Biol. 2008, 18 (10): 758-762. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.042.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhou M, Gu L, Li P, Song X, Wei L, Chen Z, Cao X: Degradome sequencing reveals endogenous small RNA targets in rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L. <i>ssp. indica</i>). Frontiers Biol. 2010, 5 (1): 67-90. 10.1007/s11515-010-0007-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Addo-Quaye C, Miller W, Axtell MJ: CleaveLand: a pipeline for using degradome data to find cleaved small RNA targets. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25 (1): 130-131. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn604.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Itaya A, Bundschuh R, Archual AJ, Joung JG, Fei Z, Dai X, Zhao PX, Tang Y, Nelson RS, Ding B: Small RNAs in tomato fruit and leaf development. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008, 1779 (2): 99-107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Rhoades MW, Reinhart BJ, Lim LP, Burge CB, Bartel B, Bartel DP: Prediction of plant microRNA targets. Cell. 2002, 110 (4): 513-520. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00863-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang S, Liu Y: Activation of salicylic acid-induced protein kinase, a mitogen-activated protein kinase, induces multiple defense responses in tobacco. Plant Cell. 2001, 13 (8): 1877-1889.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Romeis T, Piedras P, Zhang S, Klessig DF, Hirt H, Jones JD: Rapid Avr9- and Cf-9 -dependent activation of MAP kinases in tobacco cell cultures and leaves: convergence of resistance gene, elicitor, wound, and salicylate responses. Plant Cell. 1999, 11 (2): 273-287.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Lagudah ES, Moullet O, Appels R: Map-based cloning of a gene sequence encoding a nucleotide-binding domain and a leucine-rich region at the Cre3 nematode resistance locus of wheat. Genome. 1997, 40 (5): 659-665. 10.1139/g97-087.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Richter TE, Ronald PC: The evolution of disease resistance genes. Plant Mol Biol. 2000, 42 (1): 195-204. 10.1023/A:1006388223475.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Adenot X, Elmayan T, Lauressergues D, Boutet S, Bouche N, Gasciolli V, Vaucheret H: DRB4-dependent TAS3 trans-acting siRNAs control leaf morphology through AGO7. Curr Biol. 2006, 16 (9): 927-932. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.035.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Marin E, Jouannet V, Herz A, Lokerse AS, Weijers D, Vaucheret H, Nussaume L, Crespi MD, Maizel A: miR390, Arabidopsis TAS3 tasiRNAs, and their AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR targets define an autoregulatory network quantitatively regulating lateral root growth. Plant Cell. 2010, 22 (4): 1104-1117. 10.1105/tpc.109.072553.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Mallory AC, Dugas DV, Bartel DP, Bartel B: MicroRNA regulation of NAC-domain targets is required for proper formation and separation of adjacent embryonic, vegetative, and floral organs. Curr Biol. 2004, 14 (12): 1035-1046. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.022.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Guo HS, Xie Q, Fei JF, Chua NH: MicroRNA directs mRNA cleavage of the transcription factor NAC1 to downregulate auxin signals for Arabidopsis lateral root development. Plant Cell. 2005, 17 (5): 1376-1386. 10.1105/tpc.105.030841.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Pandey SP, Baldwin IT: RNA-directed RNA polymerase 1 (RdR1) mediates the resistance of Nicotiana attenuata to herbivore attack in nature. Plant J. 2007, 50 (1): 40-53. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03030.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Pandey SP, Shahi P, Gase K, Baldwin IT: Herbivory-induced changes in the small-RNA transcriptome and phytohormone signaling in Nicotiana attenuata. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105 (12): 4559-4564. 10.1073/pnas.0711363105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Lu C, Meyers BC, Green PJ: Construction of small RNA cDNA libraries for deep sequencing. Methods. 2007, 43 (2): 110-117. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2007.05.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhang JY, Xu YY, Huan Q, Chong K: Deep sequencing of Brachypodium small RNAs at the global genome level identifies microRNAs involved in cold stress response. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 449-10.1186/1471-2164-10-449.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. German MA, Luo S, Schroth G, Meyers BC, Green PJ: Construction of Parallel Analysis of RNA Ends (PARE) libraries for the study of cleaved miRNA targets and the RNA degradome. Nat Protoc. 2009, 4 (3): 356-362. 10.1038/nprot.2009.8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Rushton PJ, Bokowiec MT, Laudeman TW, Brannock JF, Chen X, Timko MP: TOBFAC: the database of tobacco transcription factors. BMC Bioinforma. 2008, 9: 53-10.1186/1471-2105-9-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Hofacker IL, Fontana W, Stadler PF, Bonhoeffer LS, Tacker M, Schuster P: Fast folding and comparison of RNA secondary structures. Monatsh Chem. 1994, 125: 167-188. 10.1007/BF00818163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Michael P. Timko for helpful discussions. This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31060046), National Tobacco Monopoly Bureau of China, YNTC (08A05) and CNTC (110200701023).

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Agronomy and James D. Watson Institute of Genome Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310058, China

      She Tang, Yu Wang, Zefeng Li, Yijie Gui & Longjiang Fan

    2. Yunnan Academy of Tobacco Agricultural Sciences and China Tobacco Breeding Research Center at Yunnan, Yuxi, Yunnan, 653100, China

      Bingguang Xiao

    3. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, 27707, USA

      Jiahua Xie

    4. CSIRO Plant Industry, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia

      Qian-Hao Zhu

    Authors
    1. She Tang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Yu Wang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Zefeng Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Yijie Gui
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Bingguang Xiao
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Jiahua Xie
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Qian-Hao Zhu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Longjiang Fan
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Longjiang Fan.

    Additional information

    Authors' contributions

    LF, QHZ and JX conceived the experiments. LF and ST designed the experiments. ST performed the experimental work. YW did the small RNA analysis. ZL carried out the degradome data analysis. YG helped in RNA isolation. BX provided plant materials. ST, QHZ and LF wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    She Tang, Yu Wang contributed equally to this work.

    Electronic supplementary material

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Tang, S., Wang, Y., Li, Z. et al. Identification of wounding and topping responsive small RNAs in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). BMC Plant Biol 12, 28 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-28

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-28

    Keywords

    BMC Plant Biology

    ISSN: 1471-2229

    Contact us