Table 3

Comparison of marker positions among bin and integrated melon map

Marker

Linkage group

Bin position (cM)

Integrated map position (cM)


ECM58

I

38-56

58

GCM168

I

75-99

82

CMBR105

III

42-65

42

CMBR100

III

42-65

45

GCM336

IV

52-77

59

GCM255

VI

45-68

55

GCM303

VI

45-68

55

ECM132

VI

80-92

91

ECM182

VII

32-60

49

ECM204

VII

73-86

81

ECM217

VIII

30-41

19

ECM128

VIII

30-41

35

GCM241

VIII

67-90

83

ECM78

X

0-14

11

ECM228

X

26-30

29

ECM164

XI

38-59

59

ECM105

XII

20-41

22


Several markers previously mapped using the bin mapping strategy [15] were included in the integrated map. The expected interval for position of the markers in centiMorgans (cM) in the integrated map based on the markers defining the bins according to Fernandez-Silva et al. (2008) [15] is shown in the "Bin position" column, while the actual position in the integrated map is given in the "Integrated map position" column.

Diaz et al. BMC Plant Biology 2011 11:111   doi:10.1186/1471-2229-11-111

Open Data