Resolution:
## Figure 5.
Validating the model. (A) Comparison of experimental results with the model. The responses are defined
as in Fig. 3, where the response is the slope of the regression line between the turning
angle θ_{tip }and sin θ_{mp}, which projects the gradient onto the tip of the pollen tube (see Fig. 3A). The different
bars compare pollen tube responses observed in experiment, predicted from the model
fit, and produced by simulations of the model. (B) Mean ⟨cosθ_{tip}⟩ plotted against δs. We use a linear model to describe this relationship. Inset: Schematic depicting
analysis of persistence length, used to set the model parameter σ. The distance between the two points along the tube path is δs, and the angle between their directions of growth is θ_{tip}. The cosines of these angles are averaged for all points along the path separated
by δs, and over all tube paths, giving the mean ⟨cosθ_{tip}⟩ as a function of δs. (C) Comparison between the circular standard deviations (σ_{0}) predicted from the linear fit in panel B, σ^{2 }= 2vδt/L, and the actual values for pollen tubes growing in the absence of ovules. The comparison
is plotted for several time intervals. The growth rate, v, was set to 2.76 μm/min.
Stewman |