Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Impact of ε and θ subunits on pharmacological properties of α3β1 GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes

BMC Pharmacology volume 6, Article number: 1 (2006) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

γ-Aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors provide the main inhibitory control in the brain. Their heterogeneity may make it possible to precisely target drug effects to selected neuronal populations. In situ hybridization using rat brain sections has revealed a unique expression of GABAA receptor ε and θ subunit transcripts in the locus coeruleus, where they are accompanied at least by α3, α2, β1 and β3 subunits. Here, we studied the pharmacology of the human α3β1, α3β1ε, α3β1θ and α3β1εθ receptor subtypes expressed in Xenopus oocytes and compared them with the γ2 subunit-containing receptors.

Results

The GABA sensitivites and effects of several positive modulators of GABAA receptors were studied in the absence and the presence of EC25 GABA using the two-electrode voltage-clamp method. We found 100-fold differences in GABA sensitivity between the receptors, α3β1ε subtype being the most sensitive and α3β1γ2 the least sensitive. Also gaboxadol dose-response curves followed the same sensitivity rank order, with EC50 values being 72 and 411 μM for α3β1ε and α3β1γ2 subtypes, respectively. In the presence of EC25 GABA, introduction of the ε subunit to the receptor complex resulted in diminished modulatory effects by etomidate, propofol, pregnanolone and flurazepam, but not by pentobarbital. Furthermore, the α3β1ε subtype displayed picrotoxin-sensitive spontaneous activity. The θ subunit-containing receptors were efficiently potentiated by the anesthetic etomidate, suggesting that θ subunit could bring the properties of β2 or β3 subunits to the receptor complex.

Conclusion

The ε and θ subunits bring additional features to α3β1 GABAA receptors. These receptor subtypes may constitute as novel drug targets in selected brain regions, e.g., in the brainstem locus coeruleus nuclei.

Background

The A-type receptors for γ-aminobutyric acid (GABAA) mediate the majority of fast inhibitory transmission in the mammalian central nervous system. Many clinically important drugs including benzodiazepines, barbiturates and general anesthetics act as positive allosteric modulators of this receptor [1–3]. GABAA receptors are pentameric ligand-gated ion-channels, composed of subunits from many subunit classes: α1–6, β1–3, γ1–3, δ, ε, θ, π, and ρ1–3. This produces a great heterogeneity in the receptor structures and receptor properties. The main receptor population containing the α1 subunit is responsible for only some, but not all, behavioral and physiological effects of GABAA receptors and, most importantly, the animals devoid of the α1 subunits survive without dramatic abnormalities [4–6]. Therefore, it is possible that minor subtypes are also relevant in physiology and as pharmacological targets.

Here, we focused our study on minor populations of novel ε and θ subunit-containing GABAA receptors. These subunits are enriched in several discrete nuclei, most remarkably in the bilateral brainstem nucleus locus coeruleus (LC) [7]. The ε and θ subunit genes are clustered with the α3 subunit gene in the chromosome Xq28 [1], suggesting a common ancestry with the three other β-α-γ GABAA receptor subunit gene clusters in other chromosomes, although the θ and ε subunits have diverged remarkably from β- and γ-like sequences [8, 9]. The in situ hybridization signals of rat brain sections have shown that the LC neurons express among the α subunits, the α3 and α2 subunit mRNAs, but not those of α1, α4, α5 or α6 [7, 10–12], among the β subunits, the β1 and β3 subunit mRNAs [13], but none of the γ1–3 mRNAs are clearly enriched in the LC neurons. In contrast to the expression profiles of the most GABAA receptor subunits, the ε and θ subunit mRNAs are strongly enriched in the LC neurons [12]. These expression profiles suggest a likely existence at least of α3β1θ, α3β1ε and α3β1 receptor populations among the LC GABAA receptors, with additional roles of α2 and β3 subunits in either replacing the α3 and β1 and/or perhaps co-assembling with them (see [14]).

The θ subunit has the highest sequence identity (about 50%) with the β1 subunit [15]. It should hypothetically form functional receptors with α and β or α and γ subunits, but in practice it may not form functional receptors when coexpressed with an α subunit or an α and β subunit as the αβθ combination failed to respond to GABA [15]. Thus, only little is known about the pharmacological properties of the θ subunit, and its role has not been satisfactorily studied in different receptor subunit combinations.

The ε subunit is more related to the γ subunits [16, 17]. The effect of the ε subunits on the properties of GABAA receptor subtypes has been studied only in a few receptor subtypes, mostly in α1 subunit-containing receptors. The ε subunit-containing receptors display insensitivity to benzodiazepines and reduced efficacy for anesthetics, spontaneous channel openings, sensitivity to picrotoxin, rapid or more extensive desensitization, and this subunit has abolished the outward rectification in recombinant receptors [17–20].

The LC is the largest noradrenergic nucleus with many projections innervating major levels of neuraxis. It plays an important role in the regulation of anxiety states, vigilance, attention and memory functions [21]. It has been shown that 50 % of the nerve terminals in the LC can accumulate [3H]GABA and that the LC neurons contain glutamic acid decarboxylase, the GABA biosynthetic enzyme [11, 22]. The LC harbors a unique repertoire of GABAA receptors due to the expression of ε and θ subunits. This report describes a characterization of recombinant α3β1θ/ε receptors that most likely form major GABAA receptor populations in the LC neurons.

Results

GABA-site sensitivity of recombinant human GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes

GABA elicited inward currents in α3β1, α3β1γ2s, α3β1θ, α3β1ε and α3β1εθ GABAA receptors that were well distinguished from the baseline, whereas no currents were detected in the α3θε combination or the dimer α3θ combination (data not shown). The GABA concentration-response curves are depicted in Fig. 1A. Currents were normalized to the maximal peak currents induced by GABA (Imax). GABA concentrations producing 50 % of the maximum efficacy (EC50) varied significantly between the receptor subtypes. The α3β1ε receptors had the highest GABA sensitivity (EC50 2.3 μM), being 25-fold higher than in α3β1 and α3β1θ receptors and almost 100-fold higher than in α3β1γ2 receptors (200 μM). The GABA sensitivity of α3β1θ receptors was not different from that of α3β1, while the addition of ε subunit significantly increased GABA sensitivity and the addition of γ2 reduced it. When both ε and θ subunits were co-injected, the oocytes had similar EC50 values for GABA as the α3β1 receptors.

Figure 1
figure 1

Responses to GABA site ligands. GABA and gaboxadol sensitivities of recombinant α3β1, α3β1γ2, α3β1θ, α3β1ε and α3β1θε GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. A. The values for currents induced by various GABA concentrations are given as means ± standard errors (n = 8 for α3β1, n = 6 for α3β1γ2, n = 7 for α3β1θ; n = 6 for α3β1ε and n = 7 for α3β1θε receptors). GABA dose-response curves were obtained by non-linear regression fits and GABA EC50 values were calculated for individual cells, being 55 ± 6 μM for α3β1 receptors, 200 ± 38 μM for α3β1γ2 (p < 0.01, unpaired t-test from α3β1), 2.3 ± 0.5 μM for α3β1ε (p < 0.001 from α3β1) and 81 ± 18 μM for α3β1θ (p > 0.05) and 35 ± 9 μM for α3β1θε receptors. Maximal currents elicited by GABA were 1.5 ± 0.9 μA for α3β1, 2.2 ± 0.5 μA for α3β1γ2, 1.2 ± 0.3 μA for α3β1θ; 1.2 ± 1.0 μA for α3β1ε and 0.9 ± 0.4 μA for α3β1θε combinations. B. Gaboxadol-induced currents are given as means ± standard errors (n = 7 for α3β1, n = 5 for α3β1γ2, n = 4 for α3β1θ; n = 5 for α3β1ε and n = 4 for α3β1θε receptors). Gaboxadol dose-response curves were obtained by non-linear regression fits and the EC50 values were calculated for individual cells, being 139 ± 19 μM for α3β1 receptors, 411 ± 13 μM for α3β1γ2 (p < 0.05, unpaired t-test from α3β1),72 ± 5 μM for α3β1ε (p > 0.05 from α3β1), 224 ± 20 μM for α3β1θ (p > 0.05) and 165 ± 19 μM for α3β1θε receptors. Maximal currents elicited by gaboxadol were 2.5 ± 0.9 μA for α3β1, 1.2 ± 0.5 μA for α3β1γ2, 0.55 ± 0.2 μA for α3β1θ, 1.0 ± 0.4 μA for α3β1ε and 0.8 ± 0.3 μA for α3β1θε combinations.

Full size image

The potency of gaboxadol, a partial agonist of the GABA site [23], at all tested receptor subtypes was lower than that of GABA (Fig. 1B). Gaboxadol had the highest potency at the α3β1ε receptor (EC50 = 72 μM), followed by α3β1 (139 μM), α3β1εθ (165 μM), α3β1θ (224 μM) and α3β1γ2 receptors (411 μM). Since different batches of oocytes were used in Fig. 1, maximal currents induced by GABA and gaboxadol could not be compared. When 1 mM concentrations of GABA and gaboxadol were individually applied to the same oocytes, the gaboxadol-evoked currents were only about 50% of the corresponding GABA currents (data not shown), suggesting that gaboxadol is a partial agonist at these receptor subtypes. More specifically in α3β1ε receptors, in which 1 mM concentrations of both agonists saturate the receptor (Fig. 1), gaboxadol-induced currents were 34 ± 2 % of the GABA currents (n = 3) and both agonists applied simultaneously evoked a current that was 90 ± 1 % of the GABA current alone.

ε subunit-containing receptors display leakage currents that can be blocked with picrotoxin

Recombinant α3β1ε receptors exhibited spontaneous activity, which could be seen by outward currents during application of 100 μM picrotoxin, the GABAA receptor channel blocker, and often by the continuous drift of the baseline. Figure 2 illustrates the effect of picrotoxin (panel A) and compares its amplitude to the inward currents induced by 1.5 μM GABA (panel B).

Figure 2
figure 2

Constitutive activity of ε subunit-containing receptors. The ε subunit-containing receptors display spontaneous currents that can be blocked with picrotoxin. A. A representative current trace recorded from an oocyte expressing spontaneously open α3β1ε receptors is shown. GABA (30 μM) application induced typical inward currents. Picrotoxin (Picro, 100 μM) reversibly blocked spontaneously active receptors as shown by blockade (outward current) of apparent leakage current. B. Peak amplitudes (in nA given as means ± standard errors) of GABA- and picrotoxin-induced currents in six oocytes expressing α3β1ε receptors.

Full size image

θ subunit confers high efficacy for etomidate

In the presence of 100 μM etomidate, GABA-induced currents were 159 ± 6 % of the control GABA response for α3β1 (mean ± standard error, n = 5), 176 ± 9 % for α3β1γ2 (n = 5), 298 ± 18 % for α3β1θ (n = 6), 122 ± 5 % for α3β1ε (n = 10) and 186 ± 7 % for α3β1εθ (n = 4) receptors (Fig. 3), indicating that the α3β1θ receptors were potentiated by etomidate the most (p < 0.001, Dunnett's test) and the α3β1ε receptors the least (p < 0.05). Nonlinear regression fit of etomidate potentiation of GABA-induced currents revealed that etomidate had higher efficacy in α3β1θ than α3β1γ2 receptors (maximal potentiation 364 ± 43 vs. 222 ± 15 % of the control GABA response, respectively, p < 0.01, unpaired t-test), but there was no drastic difference in etomidate potency (EC50 ~ 50 μM in both combinations). In α3β1εθ receptors, the efficacy of etomidate was clearly reduced from that for α3β1θ receptors.

Figure 3
figure 3

Sensitivities to the anesthetic etomidate. Modulation of GABA-induced currents by etomidate in recombinant GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. A. Representative traces of etomidate (Etom, μM) modulation of GABA-induced currents (G, EC25 in μM) in different receptor subtypes. Also the effect of flurazepam at 100 μM is shown for the α3β1γ2 receptors. B. Etomidate dose-response curves in the presence of EC25 GABA (set to 100 %). The values are means ± standard errors (n = 6 for α3β1; n = 7 for α3β1γ2; n = 9 for α3β1θ; n = 11 for α3β1ε and n = 4 for α3β1θε receptors).

Full size image

θ and γ2 subunits enhance propofol efficacy

In the presence of 100 μM propofol, GABA-induced currents were 153 ± 4 % of the control GABA response for α3β1 (mean ± standard error, n = 5), 269 ± 18 % for α3β1γ2 (n = 7), 244 ± 16 % for α3β1θ (n = 5), 126 ± 9 % for α3β1ε (n = 6) and 161 ± 6 % for α3β1εθ (n = 3) receptors (Fig. 4), indicating that both γ2 and θ subunit-containing receptors were more potentiated by propofol than α3β1 combination (p < 0.001 for both combinations vs. α3β1, Dunnett's test). The α3β1ε receptors were hardly potentiated at all, but addition of the θ subunit to this combination increased the efficacy. Nonlinear regression fit of propofol potentiation of GABA-induced currents yielded a similar potency (EC50 = 20 μM) and maximal potentiation for α3β1γ2 and α3β1θ receptors (297 ± 15 and 257 ± 12 %, respectively).

Figure 4
figure 4

Sensitivities to the anesthetic propofol. Modulation of GABA-induced currents by propofol in recombinant GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. A. Representative traces of propofol (Prop, μM) modulation of GABA-induced currents (G, EC25 in μM) in different receptor subtypes. B. Propofol dose-response curves in the presence of EC25 GABA (set to 100 %). The values are means ± standard errors (n = 6 for α3β1; n = 9 for α3β1γ2; n = 6 for α3β1θ; n = 7 for α3β1ε and n = 3 for α3β1θε receptors).

Full size image

ε and θ subunits reduce neurosteroid potency

In the presence of 1 μM pregnanolone, GABA-induced currents were 152 ± 5 % of the control GABA response for α3β1 (mean ± standard error, n = 6), 177 ± 6 % for α3β1γ2 (n = 5), 135 ± 4 % for α3β1θ (n = 5), 119 ± 8 % for α3β1ε (n = 6) and 158 ± 4 % for α3β1εθ (n = 4) receptors, indicating that γ2 subunit-containing receptors were slightly more potentiated by pregnanolone than α3β1 receptors (p < 0.05, Dunnett's test). Nonlinear regression fit of pregnanolone potentiation of GABA-induced currents yielded remarkable differences in pregnanolone potency as α3β1γ2 receptors were highly sensitive and robustly potentiated by pregnanolone [EC50 47 nM and maximal potentiation 182 ± 10 % (Fig. 5)]. The α3β1ε, α3β1 and α3β1θ receptors were apparently much less sensitive (α3β1 receptors had EC50 of 190 nM and in θ and ε subunit-containing receptors it could not be accurately estimated due to lack of saturation). The α3β1 and α3β1θ receptors were clearly potentiated, but there was only little neurosteroid potentiation in α3β1ε receptors. Interestingly, the addition of both ε and θ subunits appears to increase the potency and reduce the efficacy as compared to α3β1θ receptors.

Figure 5
figure 5

Sensitivities to the neurosteroid pregnanolone. Modulation of GABA-induced currents by the neurosteroid pregnanolone in recombinant GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. A. Representative traces of pregnanolone (Preg, nM) modulation of GABA-induced currents (G, EC25 in μM) in different receptor subtypes. B. Pregnanolone dose-response curves in the presence of EC25 GABA (set to 100 %). The values are means ± standard errors (n = 6 for α3β1; n = 5 for α3β1γ2; n = 5 for α3β1θ; n = 6 for α3β1ε and n = 4 for α3β1θε receptors).

Full size image

ε and θ subunits do not confer benzodiazepine sensitivity nor affect barbiturate modulation

Benzodiazepines presumably bind to the interface between α and γ2 subunits [24]. In the presence of 1 mM flurazepam, GABA-induced currents were affected as follows: 100 ± 3% of the GABA control response (mean ± standard error, n = 4) in α3β1, 251 ± 31% in α3β1γ2 (n = 4), 107 ± 3% in α3β1θ (n = 3) and 108 ± 6% in α3β1ε (n = 5) receptors. As expected [25], benzodiazepine sensitivity was achieved only among the receptor subtype containing the crucial γ2 subunit. Nonlinear regression fit of flurazepam effects on GABA-induced currents revealed EC50 = 11.4 μM and maximal potentiation of 254 ± 21% of the GABA control response in α3β1γ2 receptors (Fig. 6). Possible negative modulation of ε subunit-containing receptors at low flurazepam concentrations was not statistically significant (p > 0.05, n = 6).

Figure 6
figure 6

Sensitivities to the barbiturate pentobarbital and the benzodizepine flurazepam. Modulation of GABA-induced currents by pentobarbital and flurazepam in recombinant GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. A. Pentobarbital dose-response curves in the presence of EC25 GABA (set to 100 %). The values are means ± standard errors (n = 6 for α3β1; n = 9 for α3β1γ2; n = 4 for α3β1θ and n = 8 for α3β1ε receptors). B. Flurazepam dose-response curves in the presence of EC25 GABA (set to 100 %). The values are means ± standard errors (n = 6 for α3β1; n = 9 for α3β1γ2; n = 4 for α3β1θ and n = 8 for α3β1ε receptors).

Full size image

In the presense of 100 μM pentobarbital, GABA-induced currents were 210 ± 10 % of the control GABA response in α3β1 (mean ± standard error, n = 5), 308 ± 20 % in α3β1γ2 (n = 9), 265 ± 9 % in α3β1θ (n = 4) and 190 ± 10 % in α3β1ε (n = 8) receptors, showing that γ2 subunit-containing receptors were more efficaciously potentiated by pentobarbital than other combinations (p < 0.05, ANOVA), which did not differ from each other.

Direct activation by etomidate and propofol

Anesthetics at high concentrations are known to open the GABAA receptor ionophores also directly in the absence of GABA, i.e., without allosteric interaction with the GABA binding sites [1]. We used etomidate and propofol at high 300 μM non-saturating concentrations, and found that the α3β1ε, α3β1γ2, α3β1 and α3β1θ receptors were all slightly activated in the absence of GABA (Fig. 7). Etomidate at 300 μM provoked currents from 14.5 % (α3β1θ, n = 4) up to 46.8% (α3β1ε, n = 4) of EC25 GABA control responses. Propofol at 300 μM provoked even smaller currents ranging between 3 % (α3β1θ, n = 5) to 25 % (α3β1ε) of the EC25 GABA responses. All drugs and GABA controls were applied to each oocyte. These results indicate that the effects of etomidate and propofol in the presence of EC25 GABA are not due to direct effects on the receptor channel, but rather due to allosteric potentiation of the GABA action.

Figure 7
figure 7

Direct receptor activation by etomidate and propofol. Efficacy of a high concentration (300 μM) of etomidate and propofol in provoking receptor currents as compared to control EC25 GABA responses (set to 100 %). The values are means ± standard errors (n = 5 for α3β1; n = 6 for α3β1γ2; n = 5 for α3β1θ and n = 7 for α3β1ε receptors).

Full size image

Discussion

The present data indicate that the locus coeruleus -enriched ε and θ subunits of GABAA receptors produce significant functional and pharmacological changes on the α3β1 receptors. These features also differentiate them from γ2 subunit-containing receptors. It is thus possible that the novel subunits may form receptor populations that could be selectively targeted by future drugs.

As compared to the α1 subunit-containing receptors, the α3 subunit receptors display a reduced sensitivity to GABA, which has been traced to an extracellular N-terminal domain of four amino acids within the α subunits that mediates the distinct sensitivities to GABA [26]. We confirmed here the very low GABA sensitivity in most of the α3 subunit combinations tested (Fig. 1A), the EC50 values for GABA being 10–100 times higher than those found in previous studies in recombinant α1 and especially α6 subunit-containing receptors expressed in oocytes [27]. However, the ε subunit confers high GABA sensitivity to the receptors, the EC50 for GABA being almost 100-fold lower than that for α3β1γ2 receptors. Thus, the ε subunit makes the α3-receptors as sensitive to the natural transmitter as most other receptor subtypes are. This effect of ε subunit may be specifically dependent on the α subunit, since in α1 subunit-containing receptors the addition of ε does not alter GABA sensitivity [28]. The high GABA potency of the α3β1ε receptors was apparently reduced when θ subunit was added. However, whether all subunits were present in the same pentameric receptors in our conditions remains uncertain and awaits further experiments with linked subunits.

Previously it has been shown that gaboxadol binds to and acts on all GABAA receptors with a relatively low selectivity [29, 30]. More recently, gaboxadol has been suggested to affect more efficiently or potently extrasynaptically located GABAA receptors (perhaps α4/5/6βδ subtypes) [31–34], which are found at high concentrations in the hippocampus, thalamus and cerebellum, but are also present widely in the neocortex [35]. Gaboxadol potency and efficacy are dependent on the α subunit [36, 37]. In the present study, gaboxadol had a low potency at all α3 subunit-containing receptors, but its potency was higher in the presence of ε subunits than with γ2 subunits (Fig. 1B). However, the potency variation was smaller between the subtypes with gaboxadol than with GABA, which might have something to do with the differences in intrinsic efficacies. We found high apparent efficacies for gaboxadol in most receptor subtypes (Fig. 1), but in comparison to GABA in the same oocytes, its efficacy was lower than that of GABA at 1 mM concentrations. This is consistent with partial agonism of gaboxadol that has previously been shown for α3β1/2/3γ2 receptors [36].

A feature of the ε subunit-containing receptors was the spontaneous activity of the chloride channel, which has been observed in other recombinant receptor experiments when ε is expressed with α1 and β subunits [28, 38, 39]. The ε subunit-containing receptors have been suggested to have higher stability of the energetically more favorable ionophore open-state position than closed-state position, functionally causing "leakage" currents [38]. The spontaneously active currents can be blocked by GABAA antagonists such as picrotoxin (Fig. 2) [39, 40]. In line with our results with α3β1 receptors, agonist sensitivity has been shown to be increased with the degree of spontaneous receptor current in α1β2γ2/ε receptors ([40], but see [28]). The role of constitutive receptor channel activity is still uncertain, since e.g. Sergeeva and Haas [41] found that constitutive activity did not correlate with the expression of ε subunit mRNA in cultured hypothalamic neurons. Thompson et al. [19] have suggested that the relative level of ε subunit expression may influence the emergence of constitutive channel activity. At least in recombinant receptors in vitro, the constitutive activity is the hallmark of ε subunit-containing receptors.

In our experiments, the ε-containing receptors were mildly, if at all, modulated by different allosteric agonists (flurazepam, pregnanolone, etomidate and propofol) in the presence of GABA, supporting the previous findings about benzodiazepine-insensitivity and reduced efficacy of general anesthetics at ε subunit-containing receptors [17]. Since we applied GABA and the modulators simultaneously, part of the response at high modulator concentrations could be due to their direct effects. However, etomidate and especially propofol alone at 300 μM concentration caused only small responses in the absence of GABA, indicating that the main effect of these modulators was the potentiation of GABA action. Spontaneous openings induced by the ε subunit may decrease the anesthetic efficacy compared to that in α3β1 dimer subtype, although the baseline GABA sensitivity differences were taken into account by adjusting the GABA concentrations to EC25 of each receptor subtype. Furthermore, the addition of ε subunit even to the α1β3θ receptors that show high etomidate and propofol efficacies, reduced the efficacies of these drugs. Only the barbiturate pentobarbital retained its activity in the ε subunit-containing receptors in our study. Our results are in concert with those of Whiting et al. [42] and Neelands et al. [38], who found barbiturate potentiation in α1β1ε and α1β3ε combinations expressed in oocytes. However, Irnaten et al. [43] found the cardiac parasympathetic neurons transfected with the ε subunit to lose their pentobarbital modulation of spontaneous IPSCs and pentobarbital-evoked facilitation of GABAergic currents. It should be noted that the LC neurons from the rat are sensitive to barbiturates using intracellular recording from in vitro brain slices [44], indicating that the expression of ε subunits in these neurons does not make the neurons insensitive to barbiturates.

The θ subunit was clearly more silent in various receptor subunit combinations than the ε subunit. GABA sensitivity was not altered by inclusion of the θ subunit in α3β1 receptors. Injections of the oocytes with α3 and θ or α3, θ and ε subunit cRNA cocktails did not produce functional responses to GABA, although the amino acid sequence identity of the θ subunit resembles that of the β subunits [15]. This indicates that the θ subunit fails to fully replace the β subunits. Pharmacologically the θ subunit brought about clear properties to α3β1θ receptors, the most striking being the increased efficacy of the anesthetic etomidate (Fig. 3). This is important, since etomidate belongs to the growing number of GABAA receptor ligands the efficacy of which is largely determined by residues in the second transmembrane region of the β subunits [1]. Etomidate is more potent and efficacious on β2 and β3 receptors than on β1 receptors [45, 46], which apparently explains its low efficacy in our α3β1 and α3β1γ2 receptors. Our experiments should be extended to the amino acid residue level by testing whether the residue in the θ subunit (Gln), homologous TM II region residue Ser265 in the β1 subunit vs. Asn265 in the β2 and 3 subunits [46], is responsible for the altered pharmacology. This might reveal the molecular mechanisms of how θ subunits promote the actions of etomidate in β1 subunit-containing receptors. Our finding might suggest that even β1 subunit-containing receptors may be partially responsible for the actions of etomidate, when the receptor also harbors the θ subunit. This could complicate the conclusions recently drawn from the studies with mouse lines having etomidate-insensitive Asn-Ser point-mutated β2 or β3 subunits, with the β2 subunit-containing receptors selectively mediating etomidate sedation and hypothermia and β3 subunit-containing receptors etomidate hypnosis and anesthetic immobility [47–50]. However, since the θ subunit increased only the efficacy of etomidate and failed to provide the higher potency that β2 and β3 do, the β1θ subunit-containing receptors might not have a great influence on the in vivo sensitivity to etomidate.

Propofol efficacy was also high in the presence of the θ subunit, but now identical to that of the γ2 subunit. Similar efficacy profile was found for the neurosteroid pregnanolone, but not so clearly for pentobarbital. The θ subunits are not critical for the actions of benzodiazepines, as the GABA potentiation by flurazepam did not take place in α3β1θ receptors.

Conclusion

Locus coeruleus neurons express a rare repertoire of GABAA receptor subunits to form GABAA receptor subtypes with specific characteristics. Our present data suggest that α3β1θ and α3β1ε receptor subtypes, expressed uniquely in the locus coeruleus, are differentially affected by benzodiazepines and anesthetics in comparison to α3β1 and α3β1γ2 receptors. This pharmacological diversity might be exploited to find subtype-selective compounds for the treatment of stress and anxiety, and for the induction of analgesia and sedation. Furthermore, the ε subunit confers high transmitter sensitivity, which may make it a dominant site for physiological modulation, especially if located in receptors outside synapses.

Methods

All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional animal use and care committee of the University of Helsinki.

Recombinant receptor expression in Xenopus oocytes

Capped cRNAs encoding for human GABAA receptor subunits α3, β1, γ2S, ε and θ were transcribed in vitro from pCDM8 plasmids using mMessenger mMachineTM kit (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX) according to manufacturer's instructions. The θ and ε clones were from Ewen Kirkness (The Institute for Genomics Research, Rockville, USA) and α3, β1 and γ2S clones from Paul Whiting (MSD Research Laboratories, Neuroscience Research Center, Essex, UK). Oocytes were removed during 0.2 % tricainemethanosulphonate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) anesthesia from adult female Xenopus laevis frogs (Horst Kähler, Hamburg, Germany). Isolated oocytes were stored in Normal Frog Ringer (NFR containing in mM): 115 NaCl, 2.5 KCI, 18 CaCI2 and 10 HEPES; pH 7.5. Oocytes were then defolliculated manually with forceps and injected with 40 nl of a solution containing mixtures of subunit cRNAs (0.6 – 2.5 μg/μl) or pure water. Oocyte injections were carried out using a Drummond Nanoject injector (Drummond Scientific Co., Broomall, PA) via a glass micropipette having the tip diameter of about 17–20 μm. Subtype-specific cRNA cocktails were mixed beforehand, cRNA ratios of various subunits were 1:1 for α3β1 receptors, α3β1γ2S (1:1:10), α3β1θ (1:1:10), α3β1ε (1:1:1) and α3β1θε (1:1:10:1), one part being equivalent to the cRNA concentration of 2.5 μg/μl. A lower amount of ε cRNA than the γ2 and θ cRNA was injected, since higher amounts caused the oocytes to become leaky and unsuitable for electrophysiology. Oocytes were incubated at 18°C in incubation solution (MBS, Modified Barth Solution, supplemented with 2 mM sodium pyruvate, penicillin 100 U/ml and streptomycin 100 μg/ml). After injection (two h – one day) oocytes were digested for 30 min in Ca2+- free medium (82.5 mM NaCI, 2.5 mM KCI, 1 mM MgCI2, 1 mM Na2HPO4 and 5 mM HEPES; pH 7.5) containing 0.3 U/ml collagenase type IA (Sigma) in order to remove additional vitelline membrane surrounding the oocytes. After enzyme treatment, the oocytes were kept at 18°C in incubation solution until recordings.

Electrophysiological recordings

Electrophysiological recordings were started 18 h after cRNA injection. Oocytes were perfused with NFR ± drugs at the flow rate of 1 ml/min in OPC-3 stand chamber (BioScience Tools, San Diego, US) at room temperature (22°C) using two-electrode voltage clamp, Ismatec pump (Ismatec, Glattbrugg-Zürich, Switzerland) and a 17-channel perfusion system with electronically controlled pinch valves as described [51]. Drug combinations were mixed prior to experiments. Oocytes were impaled with two microelectrodes that had resistance of 1.0–2.5 MΩ when filled with 3 M KCI plus 10 mM EGTA, and voltage clamped at -50 mV using Turbo TEC-05 two-electrode voltage-clamp amplifier (npi Electronics, Tamm, Germany). GABA, flurazepam hydrochloride and sodium pentobarbital (Sigma) were dissolved in NFR as 10 mM stock solutions. Etomidate (Sigma) and propofol (Tocris Cookson, Avonmouth, UK) were dissolved into ethanol (final concentration < 0.1 %) or dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO, maximal concentration = 0.3 % by vol.), respectively. 5α-Pregnan-3-α-ol-20-one (Sigma) was prepared as 10 mM stock in DMSO and maximal final vehicle concentration of DMSO was 0.3 % (v/v) which had no effect alone or on GABA-elicited currents (not shown). The pH of stock solutions was adjusted to 7.5. Gaboxadol (4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo [5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol; THIP) was kindly provided by Bjarke Ebert (H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark). Experiments were controlled by EggWorks experimental control and data acquisition software program (version 3.0.2, npi). Drugs were applied for 10 s, and 180–300 s washout periods were used depending on drug concentrations and receptor sensitivity profiles. At least two different batches of oocytes were used to collect data for each analysis.

Data analysis

Data analysis was performed using EggWorks Reader (version 3.0.2, npi) and Prism (version 3.0, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) programs. The amplitudes of peak currents were measured from recorded traces, normalized and presented as a percentage of the control current. The GABA dose-response curves (using the top and bottom fixed to 100 and 0, respectively) and some of the drug-effect curves (no fixed parameters) were analyzed using a sigmoidal nonlinear regression fit to estimate the EC50 values and maximal efficacies. To compare GABA sensitivity or drug effects on different GABAA receptor subtypes, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett's post test were used. The data are given as means ± standard errors.

References

  1. Korpi ER, Gründer G, Lüddens H: Drug interactions at GABAA receptors. Prog Neurobiol. 2002, 67: 113-159. 10.1016/S0301-0082(02)00013-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sieghart W: Structure and pharmacology of gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptor subtypes. Pharmacol Rev. 1995, 47: 181-234.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hevers W, Lüddens H: The diversity of GABAA receptors. Pharmacological and electrophysiological properties of GABAA channel subtypes. Mol Neurobiol. 1998, 18: 35-86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sur C, Wafford KA, Reynolds DS, Hadingham KL, Bromidge F, Macaulay A, Collinson N, O'Meara G, Howell O, Newman R, Myers J, Atack JR, Dawson GR, McKernan RM, Whiting PJ, Rosahl TW: Loss of the major GABA(A) receptor subtype in the brain is not lethal in mice. J Neurosci. 2001, 21: 3409-3418.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kralic JE, Korpi ER, O'Buckley TK, Homanics GE, Morrow AL: Molecular and pharmacological characterization of GABA(A) receptor alpha1 subunit knockout mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002, 302: 1037-1045. 10.1124/jpet.102.036665.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rudolph U, Crestani F, Mohler H: GABA(A) receptor subtypes: dissecting their pharmacological functions. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001, 22: 188-194. 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01646-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sinkkonen ST, Hanna MC, Kirkness EF, Korpi ER: GABAA receptor epsilon and theta subunits display unusual structural variation between species and are enriched in the rat locus ceruleus [In Process Citation]. J Neurosci. 2000, 20: 3588-3595.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Simon J, Wakimoto H, Fujita N, Lalande M, Barnard EA: Analysis of the set of GABA(A) receptor genes in the human genome. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 41422-41435. 10.1074/jbc.M401354200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Russek SJ: Evolution of GABA(A) receptor diversity in the human genome. Gene. 1999, 227: 213-222. 10.1016/S0378-1119(98)00594-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moragues N, Ciofi P, Tramu G, Garret M: Localisation of GABA(A) receptor epsilon-subunit in cholinergic and aminergic neurones and evidence for co-distribution with the theta-subunit in rat brain. Neuroscience. 2002, 111: 657-669. 10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00033-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Luque JM, Malherbe P, Richards JG: Localization of GABAA receptor subunit mRNAs in the rat locus coeruleus. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1994, 24: 219-226. 10.1016/0169-328X(94)90135-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Heikkila AT, Echenko O, Uusi-Oukari M, Sinkkonen ST, Korpi ER: Morphine withdrawal increases expression of GABA(A) receptor epsilon subunit mRNA in locus coeruleus neurons. Neuroreport. 2001, 12: 2981-2985. 10.1097/00001756-200109170-00045.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moragues N, Ciofi P, Lafon P, Odessa MF, Tramu G, Garret M: cDNA cloning and expression of a gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor epsilon-subunit in rat brain. Eur J Neurosci. 2000, 12: 4318-4330. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.01343.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Benke D, Fakitsas P, Roggenmoser C, Michel C, Rudolph U, Mohler H: Analysis of the presence and abundance of GABAA receptors containing two different types of alpha subunits in murine brain using point-mutated alpha subunits. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 43654-43660. 10.1074/jbc.M407154200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bonnert TP, McKernan RM, Farrar S, le Bourdelles B, Heavens RP, Smith DW, Hewson L, Rigby MR, Sirinathsinghji DJ, Brown N, Wafford KA, Whiting PJ: theta, a novel gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999, 96: 9891-9896. 10.1073/pnas.96.17.9891.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barnard EA, Skolnick P, Olsen RW, Mohler H, Sieghart W, Biggio G, Braestrup C, Bateson AN, Langer SZ: International Union of Pharmacology. XV. Subtypes of g-aminobutyric acidA receptors: classification on the basis of subunit structure and receptor function. Pharmacol Rev. 1998, 50: 291-313.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Davies PA, Hanna MC, Hales TG, Kirkness EF: Insensitivity to anaesthetic agents conferred by a class of GABA(A) receptor subunit. Nature. 1997, 385: 820-823. 10.1038/385820a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Davies PA, McCartney MR, Wang W, Hales TG, Kirkness EF: Alternative transcripts of the GABA(A) receptor epsilon subunit in human and rat. Neuropharmacology. 2002, 43: 467-475. 10.1016/S0028-3908(02)00153-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson SA, Bonnert TP, Cagetti E, Whiting PJ, Wafford KA: Overexpression of the GABA(A) receptor epsilon subunit results in insensitivity to anaesthetics. Neuropharmacology. 2002, 43: 662-668. 10.1016/S0028-3908(02)00162-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wagner DA, Goldschen-Ohm MP, Hales TG, Jones MV: Kinetics and spontaneous open probability conferred by the epsilon subunit of the GABAA receptor. J Neurosci. 2005, 25: 10462-10468. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1658-05.2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aston-Jones G, Shipley MT, Chouvet G, Ennis M, van Bockstaele E, Pieribone V, Shiekhattar R, Akaoka H, Drolet G, Astier B: Afferent regulation of locus coeruleus neurons: anatomy, physiology and pharmacology. Prog Brain Res. 1991, 88: 47-75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Iijima K, Sato M, Kojima N, Ohtomo K: Immunocytochemical and in situ hybridization evidence for the coexistence of GABA and tyrosine hydroxylase in the rat locus ceruleus. Anat Rec. 1992, 234: 593-604. 10.1002/ar.1092340415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Frolund B, Liljefors T, Ebert B: GABA(A) agonists and partial agonists: THIP (Gaboxadol) as a non-opioid analgesic and a novel type of hypnotic. Biochem Pharmacol. 2004, 68: 1573-1580. 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.06.040.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sigel E, Buhr A: The benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1997, 18: 425-429.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pritchett DB, Sontheimer H, Shivers BD, Ymer S, Kettenmann H, Schofield PR, Seeburg PH: Importance of a novel GABAA receptor subunit for benzodiazepine pharmacology. Nature. 1989, 338: 582-585. 10.1038/338582a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bohme I, Rabe H, Luddens H: Four amino acids in the alpha subunits determine the gamma-aminobutyric acid sensitivities of GABAA receptor subtypes. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 35193-35200. 10.1074/jbc.M405653200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Saxena NC, Macdonald RL: Properties of putative cerebellar g-aminobutyric acidA receptor isoforms. Mol Pharmacol. 1996, 49: 567-579.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Davies PA, Kirkness EF, Hales TG: Evidence for the formation of functionally distinct alphabetagammaepsilon GABA(A) receptors. J Physiol. 2001, 537: 101-113. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0101k.x.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ebert B, Thompson SA, Saounatsou K, McKernan R, Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Wafford KA: Differences in agonist/antagonist binding affinity and receptor transduction using recombinant human gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors. Mol Pharmacol. 1997, 52: 1150-1156.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rabe H, Picard R, Uusi-Oukari M, Hevers W, Luddens H, Korpi ER: Coupling between agonist and chloride ionophore sites of the GABA(A) receptor: agonist/antagonist efficacy of 4-PIOL. Eur J Pharmacol. 2000, 409: 233-242. 10.1016/S0014-2999(00)00838-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ebert B, i Storustovu S, Mortensen M, Frolund B: Characterization of GABA(A) receptor ligands in the rat cortical wedge preparation: evidence for action at extrasynaptic receptors?. Br J Pharmacol. 2002, 137: 1-8. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704846.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lindquist CE, Ebert B, Birnir B: Extrasynaptic GABA(A) channels activated by THIP are modulated by diazepam in CA1 pyramidal neurons in the rat brain hippocampal slice. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2003, 24: 250-257. 10.1016/S1044-7431(03)00128-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brown N, Kerby J, Bonnert TP, Whiting PJ, Wafford KA: Pharmacological characterization of a novel cell line expressing human alpha(4)beta(3)delta GABA(A) receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 2002, 136: 965-974. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704795.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Adkins CE, Pillai GV, Kerby J, Bonnert TP, Haldon C, McKernan RM, Gonzalez JE, Oades K, Whiting PJ, Simpson PB: alpha 4beta 3delta Gabaa receptors characterized by fluorescence resonance energy transfer-derived measurements of membrane potential. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 38934-38939. 10.1074/jbc.M104318200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wisden W, Laurie DJ, Monyer H, Seeburg PH: The distribution of 13 GABAA receptor subunit mRNAs in the rat brain. I. Telencephalon, diencephalon, mesencephalon. J Neurosci. 1992, 12: 1040-1062.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ebert B, Wafford KA, Whiting PJ, Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Kemp JA: Molecular pharmacology of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor agonists and partial agonists in oocytes injected with different alpha, beta, and gamma receptor subunit combinations. Mol Pharmacol. 1994, 46: 957-963.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wafford KA, Thompson SA, Thomas D, Sikela J, Wilcox AS, Whiting PJ: Functional characterization of human gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptors containing the alpha 4 subunit. Mol Pharmacol. 1996, 50: 670-678.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Neelands TR, Fisher JL, Bianchi M, Macdonald RL: Spontaneous and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-activated GABA(A) receptor channels formed by epsilon subunit-containing isoforms. Mol Pharmacol. 1999, 55: 168-178.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Maksay G, Thompson SA, Wafford KA: The pharmacology of spontaneously open alpha 1 beta 3 epsilon GABA A receptor-ionophores. Neuropharmacology. 2003, 44: 994-1002. 10.1016/S0028-3908(03)00116-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mortensen M, Wafford KA, Wingrove P, Ebert B: Pharmacology of GABA(A) receptors exhibiting different levels of spontaneous activity. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003, 476: 17-24. 10.1016/S0014-2999(03)02125-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sergeeva OA, Andreeva N, Garret M, Scherer A, Haas HL: Pharmacological properties of GABAA receptors in rat hypothalamic neurons expressing the epsilon-subunit. J Neurosci. 2005, 25: 88-95. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3209-04.2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Whiting PJ, McAllister G, Vassilatis D, Bonnert TP, Heavens RP, Smith DW, Hewson L, R OD, Rigby MR, Sirinathsinghji DJ, Marshall G, Thompson SA, Wafford KA, Vasilatis D: Neuronally restricted RNA splicing regulates the expression of a novel GABAA receptor subunit conferring atypical functional properties. J Neurosci. 1997, 17: 5027-5037.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Irnaten M, Walwyn WM, Wang J, Venkatesan P, Evans C, Chang KS, Andresen MC, Hales TG, Mendelowitz D: Pentobarbital enhances GABAergic neurotransmission to cardiac parasympathetic neurons, which is prevented by expression of GABA(A) epsilon subunit. Anesthesiology. 2002, 97: 717-724. 10.1097/00000542-200209000-00027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen CL, Yang YR, Chiu TH: Activation of rat locus coeruleus neuron GABA(A) receptors by propofol and its potentiation by pentobarbital or alphaxalone. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999, 386: 201-210. 10.1016/S0014-2999(99)00750-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hill-Venning C, Belelli D, Peters JA, Lambert JJ: Subunit-dependent interaction of the general anaesthetic etomidate with the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor. Br J Pharmacol. 1997, 120: 749-756.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Belelli D, Lambert JJ, Peters JA, Wafford K, Whiting PJ: The interaction of the general anesthetic etomidate with the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor is influenced by a single amino acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997, 94: 11031-11036. 10.1073/pnas.94.20.11031.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Jurd R, Arras M, Lambert S, Drexler B, Siegwart R, Crestani F, Zaugg M, Vogt KE, Ledermann B, Antkowiak B, Rudolph U: General anesthetic actions in vivo strongly attenuated by a point mutation in the GABA(A) receptor beta3 subunit. Faseb J. 2003, 17: 250-252.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Reynolds DS, Rosahl TW, Cirone J, O'Meara GF, Haythornthwaite A, Newman RJ, Myers J, Sur C, Howell O, Rutter AR, Atack J, Macaulay AJ, Hadingham KL, Hutson PH, Belelli D, Lambert JJ, Dawson GR, McKernan R, Whiting PJ, Wafford KA: Sedation and anesthesia mediated by distinct GABA(A) receptor isoforms. J Neurosci. 2003, 23: 8608-8617.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cirone J, Rosahl TW, Reynolds DS, Newman RJ, O'Meara GF, Hutson PH, Wafford KA: Gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor beta 2 subunit mediates the hypothermic effect of etomidate in mice. Anesthesiology. 2004, 100: 1438-1445. 10.1097/00000542-200406000-00016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. O'Meara GF, Newman RJ, Fradley RL, Dawson GR, Reynolds DS: The GABA-A beta3 subunit mediates anaesthesia induced by etomidate. Neuroreport. 2004, 15: 1653-1656. 10.1097/01.wnr.0000134842.56131.fe.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sinkkonen ST, Mansikkamaki S, Moykkynen T, Luddens H, Uusi-Oukari M, Korpi ER: Receptor subtype-dependent positive and negative modulation of GABA(A) receptor function by niflumic acid, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Mol Pharmacol. 2003, 64: 753-763. 10.1124/mol.64.3.753.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Center for International Mobilisation (CIMO), the Yrjö Jahnsson foundation and the Academy of Finland. The generous donation of human GABAA receptor plasmids by Ewen Kirkness and Paul Whiting and that of gaboxadol by Bjarke Ebert are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Biomedicine, Pharmacology, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, POB 63, (Haartmaninkatu 8), FI-00014, Finland

    Martin Ranna, Saku T Sinkkonen, Tommi Möykkynen & Esa R Korpi

  2. Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Turku, Itäinen Pitkäkatu 4, FI-20520, Turku, Finland

    Mikko Uusi-Oukari

Authors
  1. Martin Ranna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saku T Sinkkonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tommi Möykkynen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mikko Uusi-Oukari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Esa R Korpi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esa R Korpi.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

MR carried out the experiments and drafted the manuscript. STS helped with the planning of the experiments and the analyses of the experimental results. TM set up the electrophysiological method. MUO set up the methods for cRNA production. ERK planned the experiments and helped to interpret the results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ranna, M., Sinkkonen, S.T., Möykkynen, T. et al. Impact of ε and θ subunits on pharmacological properties of α3β1 GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. BMC Pharmacol 6, 1 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2210-6-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2210-6-1

Keywords

BMC Pharmacology

ISSN: 1471-2210