|
| This article is part of the supplement: Seventeenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2008Cost of linearization for different time constants1Department of Physics and Astronomy, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA 2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
from Seventeenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2008 BMC Neuroscience 2008, 9(Suppl 1):P52doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-S1-P52 The electronic version of this abstract is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/9/S1/P52
© 2008 Morel and Levy; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Poster presentationPersistent sodium and A-type potassium conductances serve as linearizing mechanisms over limited and different voltage ranges. This research investigates the relationship between time constants and the metabolic cost (here total potassium current IK) of such linearization. This metabolic cost is a window into explaining the 40% energy use by postsynaptic elements of the brain [1]. We consider neurons under constant synaptic bombardment spending much of their time in a range of -62 to -58 mV with threshold around -55 to -52 mV. For this subthreshold voltage range, the A-type potassium (gA) [2] and the persistent sodium (gNaP) [3,4] are the most relevant linearizing conductances. Here 'linear' means that, within a certain voltage range, each additional active synapse makes the same depolarizing contribution, in contrast to the sublinear contributions occurring in purely passive dendrites. Steady-state voltages and currents are evaluated for a single-compartment dendritic model under synaptic bombardment. There are three conductances in each analysis: the resting dendritic conductance gd with a reversal potential of -72 mV; the synaptic conductance gs with a reversal potential of 0 mV; and a voltage-dependent conductance, either gNaP or gA, with reversal potentials of +55 mV and -95 mV respectively. The assumed capacitance of this collapsed dendritic field is 1 nF. Table 1 shows that, in the presence of an appropriate amount of active conductance (gA or gNaP), there is 1) a constant voltage range of linearization across time constants and 2) there exists a direct relationship between time constant and total cost. Indeed as the time constant speeds up, the metabolic cost in terms of coulombs/sec increases as dictated by higher total conductance. To conclude: 1) faster computing is linearly increasing in metabolic cost; 2) changing inhibitory tone appears to require dynamic control of the available linearizing conductance if threshold is unchanged. Table 1. Sample results References
Have something to say? Post a comment on this article! |



on Google Scholar






author email
corresponding author email