Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Seventeenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2008

Open Access Open Badges Oral presentation

One cell, two bursting mechanisms. In vivo conditions change the in vitro burst in pyramidal cells of the ElectroLateral Lobe (ELL) of electric fish

Natalia Toporikova* and Maurice J Chacron

Author Affiliations

Department of Physiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y6, Canada

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2008, 9(Suppl 1):O8  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-S1-O8

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:

Published:11 July 2008

© 2008 Toporikova and Chacron; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Oral presentation

The intrinsic mechanisms underlying burst generation in vitro where neurons are in relative isolation are generally well understood [1]. However, how these mechanisms are implemented under in vivo conditions where cells receive massive synaptic bombardment is still not clear. Pyramidal cells within the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL) of weakly electric fish have a well-defined burst mechanism in vitro (Fig. 1A), which is based on a somato-dendritic interaction [2]. Surprisingly, in vivo recordings from ELL pyramidal cells (Fig. 1B) do not show any of the characteristics associated with bursting found in vitro [3]. The goal of this project is to understand how in vivo conditions can give rise to these differences.

thumbnailFigure 1. Bursting in the ELL pyramidal cells. (A) Representative trace of the in vitro recorded burst. Somatic spikes backpropagate into the dendrites, generating a dendritic spike which will move back into the soma, generating a depolarizing afterpotential (DAP), which will trigger a new somatic action potential The burst terminates with a characteristic doublet, followed by the burst after hyperpolarization (bAHP) (B) Representative trace of the in vivo recorded burst. Here there is no significant decrease in the interspike interval during a burst, bursts do not terminate with a doublet and the bAHP is absent. Also, the somatic spike shape recorded in vivo differs from the one recorded in vitro, with a pronounced hyperpolarization (AHP) following every spike within a burst.

One of the striking differences between in vivo and in vitro conditions is the absence of glutamatergic input to the cells in vitro which might provide the major source of Ca2+ to the cell via NMDA receptors. To test this hypothesis, we injected the calcium chelator, BAPTA, in pyramidal cell in vivo. The resulting removal of intracellular Ca2+ changed the cell bursting pattern to one characteristic of in vitro recordings.

To understand these observations, we have used a computational approach to propose a cellular mechanism for burst generation in vivo. In our computational model, which is based on the in vitro ghost-burst model, Ca2+ enters the cell through NMDA channels in the dendrites. When Ca2+ diffuses into the soma, it affects the Ca-activated potassium current. Gradual increases in Ca2+ concentration increases this current and eventually terminates the burst. This current also creates a spike shape characteristic to an in vivo burst, with a strong hyperpolarization after every spike within a burst.


  1. Izhikevich EM: Neural excitability, spiking and bursting.

    International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 2000, 8(6):1171-1266. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Lemon N, Turner RW: Conditional spike backpropagation generates burst discharge in a sensory neuron.

    J Neurophysiol 2000, 84(3):1519-30. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Bastian J, Nguyenkim J: Dendritic modulation of burst-like firing in sensory neurons.

    J Neurophysiol 2001, 85(1):10-22. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL