Table 1 |
||||
|
Characteristics of L-Arg stimulated ion channel activity of the three enrichment steps compared with the same parameters from the native L-Arg stimulated channels as reported by Kumazawa et al.* |
||||
|
Sample |
+Unitary Conductance pS |
Concentration of L-Arg, μM |
Concentration of D-Arg, μM |
Cation-anion selectivity |
|
|
||||
|
RCA-I lectin column material |
58 ± 5 |
---- |
||
|
Sephacryl S300 column material |
66 ± 3 |
1 – 50 |
10 – 200 |
Weak cation (PNa/PCl = 2.2) |
|
Ion-exchange column material |
73 ± 7 |
-- |
||
|
Ion Channels from Taste Tissue |
40 – 60 75–100 |
1 – 200 |
10 – 200 |
Cation |
|
|
||||
|
* From Kumazawa [31] + Data on unitary conductance reported as Mean ± SD obtained from at least three experiments. |
||||
|
Grosvenor et al. BMC Neuroscience 2004 5:25 doi:10.1186/1471-2202-5-25 |
||||
