Table 3

First mapping
Subject No response Performance Hesitation Neologism Phonological Circumlocution Semantic Totals
Errors Rate Errors Rate Errors Rate Errors Rate Errors Rate Errors Rate Errors Rate Errors Trials Error rate
M1 28 0.05 124 0.21 40 0.07 48 0.08 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 241 591 0.41
M2 17 0.06 28 0.10 32 0.11 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 77 294 0.26
M3 22 0.06 42 0.12 32 0.09 5 0.01 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.01 103 363 0.28
M4 5 0.02 32 0.11 20 0.07 3 0.01 1 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.01 63 300 0.21
M5 2 0.01 51 0.17 14 0.05 3 0.01 2 0.01 0 0.00 0 0.00 72 300 0.24
F1 17 0.06 37 0.13 22 0.08 2 0.01 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.01 80 291 0.27
F2 20 0.05 31 0.08 34 0.09 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 85 366 0.23
F3 10 0.03 19 0.05 32 0.09 1 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 63 354 0.18
F4 16 0.04 35 0.08 21 0.05 0 0.00 1 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.00 75 450 0.17
F5 42 0.14 11 0.04 47 0.16 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.01 102 297 0.34
MIN 2 0.01 11 0.04 14 0.05 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 63 291 0.17
MAX 42 0.14 124 0.21 47 0.16 48 0.08 2 0.01 0 0.00 2 0.01 241 591 0.41
MEDIAN 17 0.05 33.5 0.11 32 0.09 1.5 0.01 0 0.00 0 0.00 1.5 0.00 78.5 327 0.25

Distribution of naming errors in the first mapping: Summary of naming errors induced by rTMS per subject (M1-M5: male volunteers; F1-F5: female volunteers). Below is reported number of trials (rTMS trains), total number errors, and error type and rate of each given error type of all induced errors.

Sollmann et al.

Sollmann et al. BMC Neuroscience 2013 14:150   doi:10.1186/1471-2202-14-150

Open Data