Table 2

Average prediction rates at each site with different numbers of training subjects
(12,12) (24,24) (32,32) (48,48) (60,60) (80,80) (100,100) Best performance
Site 9 68% 68% 73% 73% 75% 77% 85% 85%
Site 10 64% 66% 69% 66% 67% 68% 80% 80%
Site 3 57% 62% 63% 69% 72% 75% 78% 78%
Site 8 57% 65% 61% 66% 67% 71% 63% 71%
Site 1 53% 59% 62% 61% 65% 69% 70% 70%
Site 5 51% 56% 58% 61% 60% 69% 65% 69%
Site 2 56% 63% 61% 62% 62% 64% 68% 68%
Site 7 59% 59% 58% 64% 63% 61% 63% 64%
Site 4 50% 53% 52% 59% 54% 58% 63% 63%
Site 6 51% 62% 55% 60% 59% 58% 53% 62%

Sites are sorted based on best performance in the last column.

Biurrun Manresa et al.

Biurrun Manresa et al. BMC Neuroscience 2013 14:110   doi:10.1186/1471-2202-14-110

Open Data