Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Twenty First Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2012

Open Access Poster presentation

Modeling cuttlefish behavioural chromatophore response

Zach Zboch* and James Peterson

  • * Corresponding author: Zach Zboch

Author Affiliations

Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2012, 13(Suppl 1):P4  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-13-S1-P4

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/13/S1/P4


Published:16 July 2012

© 2012 Zboch and Peterson; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Poster presentation

We build a model of cuttlefish chromatophore excitation patterns due to environmental input. Specific inputs generate scripted chromtophore pattern responses on the surface of the skin. More complicated responses are then assembled from these templates as sequences of inputs arrive. We build a simplistic cuttlefish brain using neural architecture modeling tools written in MatLab which allow us to construct the brain model from individual modules using a vector addressing scheme [1] (Figure 1).

thumbnailFigure 1. Cuttlefish chromatophore processing

Inputs come into the sensory input module and are processed by the cuttlefish brain architecture into signals sent to the output module. The signals activate the individual chromatophores in the usual way giving an essentially binary on/ off pixel response. Different cues in the environment are mapped to known cuttlefish pigmentation overlays on the surface of the skin. Individual simple cues result in coarse patterns of chromotophore activation and upon receiving a sequence of simple cues, more complicated responses are constructed in a hierarchical fashion [1].

The chromatophore visibility is known to be due to a brain signal which when received energizes a ring of muscle which contracts and pushes a dot of ink up to the surface of the skin. Hence, activation signals lead to visible dots and lack of activation signal can be inferred from the loss of the pigment dot. Our model therefore treats each chromatophore as a binary switch which moves from 1 to 0 or vice versa depending on the signal sent to the output module from our cuttlefish brain processing [3,4].

References

  1. Peterson JK: Bioinformation Processing: A primer on cognitive modeling volume one. [http://www.lulu.com] webcite

  2. Messenger JB: Cephalopod chromatophores: neurobiology and natural history.

    Biol. Rev 2001, 76:473-528. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Parker GH: Animal Colour Changes and their Neurohumours: A survey of investigations 1910 – 1943. Hafner Publishing Company, NY; 1971.

  4. Bagnara JT, Hadley ME: Chromatophores and Color Changes: the comparative physiology of animal pigmentation. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey; 1973.