Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Twenty First Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2012

Open Access Poster presentation

Spatial processing in binocular rivalry

Phyllis M Thangaraj*, Shashaank Vattikuti and Carson C Chow

Author Affiliations

Laboratory of Biological Modeling, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2012, 13(Suppl 1):P166  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-13-S1-P166


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/13/S1/P166


Published:16 July 2012

© 2012 Thangaraj et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Poster presentation

In the presence of ambiguous visual stimuli, cortical neurons will exhibit rivalry, normalization or winner-take-all dynamics. Binocular rivalry describes the oscillation of image perception that occurs when a different image is presented to each eye simultaneously [1]. However, rivalry only occurs if the two images are spatially co-localized. If the images are spatially separated then the neural activity will exhibit normalization, where the activity of a neuron is a sub-linear sum of the activities when each image is presented separately. Population rate models can reproduce the these three phases [2] and phase transitions occur under changes in the mutual inhibition strength between neurons.

Measured neuronal activity that is most strongly correlated with the observed percept is generally located in higher visual areas such as inferotemporal cortex. Hence, the mechanism that causes neurons to exhibit rivalry when images are spatially co-localized and normalization when they are not is not understood. Until recently, the recognition of an object by the inferotemporal cortex was considered to be an independent process from determining the object’s position in space. This assumption corresponded with the observation that object recognition does not change significantly when the object moves within the visual field. Evidence had been mounting against this assumption, beginning with the finding that IT neurons have receptive fields and are sensitive to changes in position [3]. Through neuroimaging of the cortex and behavioral testing, it was determined that object representation in the inferotemporal cortex does in fact depend on position [4].

This study creates a three dimensional model of binocular rivalry in which the neurons respond to specific two dimensional positions in space and a particular stimulus type. Past models of rivalry have included two-dimensional positions of neurons [5]. This model describes how the position of rivaling images can influence the strength and timing of binocular rivalry. By encoding spatial preferences into the neurons, this model is able to simulate binocular rivalry initiation through changes in object position in addition to changes in inhibition strength. Based on an image’s position, certain neurons may not be directly stimulated, but may spike anyway due to their connections with stimulated neurons, causing a transition into binocular rivalry from normalization. By encoding spatial preferences into the neurons, this model allows phase transitions to occur through changes in object position in addition to changes in inhibition strength.

References

  1. Seely J, Chow CC: Role of Mutual Inhibition in Binocular Rivalry.

    Journal of Neurophysiology 2011, 106:2136-2150. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Moldakarimov S, Rollenhagen JE, Olsen CR, Chow CC: Competitive Dynamics in Cortical Responses to Visual Stimuli.

    Journal of Neurophysiology 2005, 94:3388-3396. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. DiCarlo JJ, Maunsell JHR: Anterior Inferotemporal Neurons of Monkeys Engaged in Object Recognition Can be Highly Sensitive to Object Retinal Position.

    Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 89:3264-3278. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Kravitz DJ, Kriegestkorte N, Baker CI: High-Level Visual Object Representations are Constrained by Position.

    Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20:2916-2925. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  5. Kilpatrick ZP, Bressloff PC: Spatially Structured Oscillations in a Two-Dimensional Excitatory Neuronal Network with Synaptic Depression.

    Journal of Computational Neuroscience 2010, 28:193-209. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL