Table 1

Statistical analyses of the MNE data
Effect F df1 df2 p
N1m time range
Hemisphere
Anterior inferior parietal 19,81 1 7 <0.01
Anterior superior temporal 9,83 1 7 <0.02
Posterior superior parietal 7,78 1 7 <0.05
Degradation
Central inferior parietal 4,17 2 14 <0.05
Central superior temporal 5,62 2 14 <0.02
Hemisphere × Attention
Central superior parietal 7,05 1 7 <0.05
P2m time range
Hemisphere
Anterior superior temporal 7,78 1 7 <0.05
Central inferior temporal 6,44 1 7 <0.05
Posterior superior parietal 9,37 1 7 <0.02
Attention
Posterior superior parietal 5,76 1 7 <0.05
Attention × Degradation
Anterior superior temporal 6,01 2 14 <0.02
Central superior temporal 5,48 2 14 <0.02
Anterior inferior temporal 4,77 2 14 <0.05
Posterior inferior temporal 4,61 2 14 <0.05
Early SF time range
Degradation
Central superior temporal 5,28 2 14 <0.02
Central inferior temporal 3,89 2 14 <0.05
Attention × Degradation
Central inferior parietal 4,44 2 14 <0.05
Posterior superior temporal 4,20 2 14 <0.05
Late SF time range
Hemisphere
Central superior parietal 10,05 1 7 <0.02
Posterior superior parietal 11,33 1 7 <0.02
Attention
Central superior parietal 6,84 1 7 <0.05
Attention × Degradation
Central inferior parietal 4,10 2 14 <0.05

ANOVA results for the hemisphere, degradation and attention of the source current strength within specific ROIs during the N1m, P2m, early SF and late SF time windows. Only statistically significant effects are shown.

Tiitinen et al.

Tiitinen et al. BMC Neuroscience 2012 13:157   doi:10.1186/1471-2202-13-157

Open Data