Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Twentieth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2011

Open Access Poster presentation

Synaptic tagging and capture: a bridge from molecular to behaviour

Lorric Ziegler* and Wulfram Gerstner

Author Affiliations

School of Computer and Communication Sciences and Brain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne EPFL, Switzerland

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2011, 12(Suppl 1):P122  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-12-S1-P122

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/12/S1/P122


Published:18 July 2011

© 2011 Ziegler and Gerstner; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Poster presentation

Hippocampal plasticity is now widely accepted as being the substrate for episodic memory formation. More specifically, several studies in area CA1 of the hippocampus support the Synaptic Tagging and Capture hypothesis (STC) which describes the induction as well as the consolidation phases of synaptic Long-Term Potentiation/Depression (LTP/D) (for a review see [1]). In this framework, initial changes in the synaptic weights require an external signal, sometimes called 3rd factor, in order to persist over time. This maintenance signal, comparable to the reward of reinforcement learning theory, is non local and leads to associative effects, i.e. synaptic modifications induced by a weak LTP/D event can be rescued by a strong event happening closely in time. Recently, new experimental paradigms corresponding to a behavioural analog of STC have been developed [2,3]. In these setups, Long-Term Memory (LTM) of rodents is probed in different contexts in order to determine how weak versus strong stimuli, as well as open field exploration, influence the lifetime of the memory trace. In the case of novel environment exploration, similar associative effects can be observed as in CA1 slices measurements, where an independent but behaviourally relevant stimulus can help maintain an otherwise decaying memory trace.

We propose a simple model network of the medial temporal lobe to bridge the two concepts (LTP/D and LTM) within the framework of STC. The model consists of rate nodes and connectivity patterns inspired from the hippocampus and the lateral amygdala. In order to simulate initial storage and longer temporal evolution of spatial or emotional memory, we implement hippocampal plasticity with a rate version of the Tag-Trigger-Consolidation (TagTriC) model [4], developed to reproduce induction and maintenance of LTP/D in CA1. Finally animal behaviour is derived from elementary statistics of decision units within the network. Simulation results show that the functional properties of TagTriC transpose to this behavioural paradigm. Moreover, the model was able to explain an interference observed when the rescuing event, e.g. open field exploration, occurs too close to the memory encoding event. Responsible for this interference is a resetting of the plastic modifications induced within the same network parts when active consecutively in different contexts. This interaction unfolds naturally from our modified TagTriC consistent with tag resetting in vitro[5].

This work intends to make a first step towards integration of different levels, functional plasticity and behaviour, of a more general theory of memory. It supports the tagging and capture hypothesis as a basic building block for episodic memory.

References

  1. Morris RGM: Elements of a neurobiological theory of hippocampal function: the role of synaptic plasticity, synaptic tagging and schemas.

    European Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 23:2829-2846. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Ballarini F, Moncada D, Martinez MC, Alen N, Viola H: Behavioral tagging is a general mechanism of long-term memory formation.

    PNAS 2009, 106(34):14599-14604. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  3. Wang SH, Redondo RL, Morris RGM: Relevance of synaptic tagging and capture to the persistance of long-term potentiation and everyday spatial memory.

    PNAS 2010, 107(45):19537-19542. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  4. Ziegler L, Clopath C, Vasilaki E, Buesing L, Gerstner W: Tag-Trigger-Consolidation: a model of early and late long-term potentiation and depression.

    PloS Comput Biol 2008., 4(12) PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  5. Sajikumar S, Frey U: Resetting or 'synaptic tags' is time- and activity-dependent in rat hippocampal CA1 in vitro.

    J Neurosci 2004, 129:503-507. Publisher Full Text OpenURL