Table 2

The results of four repeated measures ANOVAs comparing either the accuracy or the duration of performance on either the last vs. the first mCST trial or after vs. before the session break on all experimental days.

Effects

df; df_error

F

p_two-tailed

η²_part

power

last vs. first mCST TRIAL

ACCURACY

TRIAL

1; 49

1.97

.167

.04

.28

STUDY

4; 49

.71

.587

.06

.21

TRIAL×STUDY

4; 49

.42

.791

.03

.14

DURATION

TRIAL

1; 49

12.45

.001*

.20

.93

STUDY

4; 49

1.91

.124

.14

.54

TRIAL×STUDY

4; 49

.65

.628

.05

.20

after vs. before BREAK (all days)

ACCURACY

BREAK

1; 49

.31

.581

.01

.09

STUDY

4; 49

1.14

.350

.09

.33

BREAK×STUDY

4; 49

.38

.826

.03

.13

DURATION

BREAK

1; 49

6.82

.012*

.12

.73

STUDY

4; 49

1.35

.266

.10

.39

BREAK×STUDY

4; 49

.63

.646

.05

.19

Note. df- degrees of freedom, η²_part- partial eta squared (measure of effect size).

*p < .05

Kedzior et al. BMC Neuroscience 2011 12:101   doi:10.1186/1471-2202-12-101