Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Nineteenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2010

Open Access Oral presentation

Causal networks in the rat barrel cortex provide a signature of stimulus encoding

Seif Eldawlatly1* and Karim Oweiss12

Author Affiliations

1 Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept., Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA

2 Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2010, 11(Suppl 1):O18  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-11-S1-O18


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/11/S1/O18


Published:20 July 2010

© 2010 Eldawlatly and Oweiss; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Oral presentation

Identifying stimulus-dependent cortical circuits is a fundamental goal in systems neuroscience. Graph-theoretic techniques provide an elegant tool to infer such circuitry. Recently, we have proposed to use Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBN) as an efficient graphical model that explains the observed spike train data in local cortical circuits. A unique advantage of DBNs over other metrics of neuronal connectivity (such as crosscorrelograms) is its ability to explain the temporally precise activity of an observed neuron taking into account the activity of the entire observed population.

We recorded simultaneously the ensemble neural activity using 32-channel microelectrode arrays from Layer V of the primary somatosensory (barrel) cortex in 3 anesthetized rats. An average population size of 20±7 single units/rat was identified. Responses were recorded during stimulation of individual whiskers (3 whiskers/rat). Each whisker was horizontally deflected with a displacement of 80 μm for 100 ms at 1 Hz frequency. Spike trains within 100 ms of stimulus onset were analyzed using DBN. To rule out the existence of spurious connections inferred by co-modulation of firing rates, a jittered version of the spike trains was formed in which each spike was randomly jittered in a uniform interval of [-5,5] ms. Common connections inferred in the original and jittered data were eliminated.

Results demonstrate that stable stimulus-driven network states were obtained, with 22% of the inferred connections appearing in more than 35% of the trials. To examine the validity of these results, we computed the correlation between the response latency of each neuron and the number of inferred pre-synaptic/post-synaptic connections for each stimulated whisker. In a causal network context, we hypothesized that pre-synaptic neurons that fire before other post-synaptic neurons in the observed population should have shorter response latency reminiscent of a “signaling mechanism” to other neurons about stimulus presence. Therefore, these neurons were expected to have more post-synaptic connections than their large response latency counterparts. Correlation between the response latency and the number of post-synaptic (pre-synaptic) connections was -0.63 (+0.61) consistent with our hypothesis. Finally, we used 90% of the trials to obtain a template network model for each whisker stimulated. We then decoded the spike trains in the remaining 10% of the trials to determine the corresponding whisker identity. A decoding accuracy of 97% was obtained indicating that the obtained causal networks are stimulus-dependent in which the population acts cooperatively rather than independently to encode the underlying stimulus.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by NIH grants #NS054148 and NS062031.